BPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limits

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marcello Peixoto Bax
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Marco Aurélio Mendes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892018000100008
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/51583
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-3031
Resumo: Enterprise information architectures still do not deliver all the value that comes from integrating structured and unstructured information. Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management were developed as autonomous disciplines. Thus, Enterprise Content Management still occurs without formally considering the business processes that generate and manipulate content, while Business Process Management initiatives arise without a documented treatment of materials produced by the processes. The non-integrated approach to these disciplines collaborates to reduce the potential benefits expected in Organizational Change Management programs. In such context, the article discusses the interrelation between Business Process Management and Enterprise Content Management, approaching from a historical view of these disciplines, their conceptual limits, technological support, and dialogues that would benefit both initiatives. The paper contributes to clarify a question still vague in the field of Information Management, which is how to integrate Business Process Management and Enterprise Content Management treating structured and unstructured information in a unified manner. It discusses how to approach this issue in a broad scope of IM by combining the concepts of Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management. Based on a literature review, the paper analyzes and synthesizes experiences in Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management acquired in the context of a project carried out in a Power Sector Company. The article reveals problems in separating approaches to Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management. It shows the importance of an effort for integration and presents three instruments that promote the linkage of the two initiatives, approximating process offices and analysts’ information.
id UFMG_0c7aa1a3bf46a1b0692fa761ce7aa63f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/51583
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2023-04-04T21:05:59Z2023-04-04T21:05:59Z2022-06-2130195105https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-088920180001000082318-0889http://hdl.handle.net/1843/51583https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-3031Enterprise information architectures still do not deliver all the value that comes from integrating structured and unstructured information. Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management were developed as autonomous disciplines. Thus, Enterprise Content Management still occurs without formally considering the business processes that generate and manipulate content, while Business Process Management initiatives arise without a documented treatment of materials produced by the processes. The non-integrated approach to these disciplines collaborates to reduce the potential benefits expected in Organizational Change Management programs. In such context, the article discusses the interrelation between Business Process Management and Enterprise Content Management, approaching from a historical view of these disciplines, their conceptual limits, technological support, and dialogues that would benefit both initiatives. The paper contributes to clarify a question still vague in the field of Information Management, which is how to integrate Business Process Management and Enterprise Content Management treating structured and unstructured information in a unified manner. It discusses how to approach this issue in a broad scope of IM by combining the concepts of Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management. Based on a literature review, the paper analyzes and synthesizes experiences in Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management acquired in the context of a project carried out in a Power Sector Company. The article reveals problems in separating approaches to Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management. It shows the importance of an effort for integration and presents three instruments that promote the linkage of the two initiatives, approximating process offices and analysts’ information.Arquiteturas de informação corporativas ainda não entregam todo o valor que advém da integração de informações estruturadas e não estruturadas. O artigo discute formas complementares de abordar essa questão por meio da integração dos conceitos de Gestão de Conteúdo Corporativo e Gestão por Processos de Negócios, que se desenvolveram até hoje como disciplinas autônomas. Iniciativas de gestão de conteúdo corporativo ainda ocorrem sem considerar formalmente os processos de negócio que geram e manipulam conteúdos. Ao mesmo tempo, iniciativas de gestão por processos de negócio ocorrem sem um tratamento formalizado dos conteúdos produzidos por esses processos. A abordagem não integrada das duas disciplinas colabora para reduzir os benefícios potenciais esperados da arquitetura de informação corporativa e dos programas de gestão de informação. O artigo discute a inter-relação entre ambas, abordando desde a visão histórica dessas disciplinas, seus limites conceituais e suporte tecnológico, até a necessidade de diálogo para benefício mútuo. O artigo esclarece, assim, uma questão teórica ainda vaga: como se podem tratar de forma integrada as duas disciplinas e unificar, em âmbito corporativo, informação estruturada e não estruturada. À luz de uma revisão da literatura, buscou-se analisar e sintetizar experiências em Gestão de Conteúdo Corporativo e Gestão por Processos de Negócios adquiridas no contexto de um projeto de gestão de conteúdo corporativo em empresa do setor elétrico. O artigo revela problemas de abordagens desintegradas das disciplinas e mostra a importância do esforço de integração das duas iniciativas, apresentando três instrumentos complementares que promovem o seu enlace, ao mesmo tempo que aproxima escritórios de processo e analistas de informação.engUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGBrasilECI - DEPARTAMENTO DE TEORIA E GESTÃO INFORMAÇÃOTransinformaçãoDocumentos - AdministraçãoGestão da InformaçãoBusiness Process Management (BPM)Archival sciencesBusiness Process Management (BPM)Document managementEnterprise content managementBPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limitsBPM e ECM: similaridades, diferenças e limites conceituais e tecnológicosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5942Marcello Peixoto BaxMarco Aurélio Mendesapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGLICENSELicense.txtLicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82042https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/51583/1/License.txtfa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22MD51ORIGINALBPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limitsBPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limitsapplication/pdf226722https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/51583/2/BPM%20e%20ECM%3a%20similarities%2c%20differences%2c%20conceptual%2c%20and%20technological%20limits5bed95671de6bde43c0909e5e0e98481MD521843/515832023-04-04 20:48:29.629oai:repositorio.ufmg.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2023-04-04T23:48:29Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv BPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limits
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv BPM e ECM: similaridades, diferenças e limites conceituais e tecnológicos
title BPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limits
spellingShingle BPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limits
Marcello Peixoto Bax
Archival sciences
Business Process Management (BPM)
Document management
Enterprise content management
Documentos - Administração
Gestão da Informação
Business Process Management (BPM)
title_short BPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limits
title_full BPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limits
title_fullStr BPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limits
title_full_unstemmed BPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limits
title_sort BPM e ECM: similarities, differences, conceptual, and technological limits
author Marcello Peixoto Bax
author_facet Marcello Peixoto Bax
Marco Aurélio Mendes
author_role author
author2 Marco Aurélio Mendes
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marcello Peixoto Bax
Marco Aurélio Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Archival sciences
Business Process Management (BPM)
Document management
Enterprise content management
topic Archival sciences
Business Process Management (BPM)
Document management
Enterprise content management
Documentos - Administração
Gestão da Informação
Business Process Management (BPM)
dc.subject.other.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Documentos - Administração
Gestão da Informação
Business Process Management (BPM)
description Enterprise information architectures still do not deliver all the value that comes from integrating structured and unstructured information. Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management were developed as autonomous disciplines. Thus, Enterprise Content Management still occurs without formally considering the business processes that generate and manipulate content, while Business Process Management initiatives arise without a documented treatment of materials produced by the processes. The non-integrated approach to these disciplines collaborates to reduce the potential benefits expected in Organizational Change Management programs. In such context, the article discusses the interrelation between Business Process Management and Enterprise Content Management, approaching from a historical view of these disciplines, their conceptual limits, technological support, and dialogues that would benefit both initiatives. The paper contributes to clarify a question still vague in the field of Information Management, which is how to integrate Business Process Management and Enterprise Content Management treating structured and unstructured information in a unified manner. It discusses how to approach this issue in a broad scope of IM by combining the concepts of Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management. Based on a literature review, the paper analyzes and synthesizes experiences in Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management acquired in the context of a project carried out in a Power Sector Company. The article reveals problems in separating approaches to Enterprise Content Management and Business Process Management. It shows the importance of an effort for integration and presents three instruments that promote the linkage of the two initiatives, approximating process offices and analysts’ information.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022-06-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-04-04T21:05:59Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-04-04T21:05:59Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1843/51583
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892018000100008
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2318-0889
dc.identifier.orcid.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-3031
url https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892018000100008
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/51583
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-3031
identifier_str_mv 2318-0889
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Transinformação
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv ECI - DEPARTAMENTO DE TEORIA E GESTÃO INFORMAÇÃO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/51583/1/License.txt
https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/51583/2/BPM%20e%20ECM%3a%20similarities%2c%20differences%2c%20conceptual%2c%20and%20technological%20limits
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv fa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22
5bed95671de6bde43c0909e5e0e98481
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803589403636924416