| spelling |
José Raimundo Maia Netohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4781811E3&tokenCaptchar=03AGdBq27w_XoEpZEb29FgBM2hcFHD8FSR5cBGkaf-FuaugoVHkX9TKanzMT7eknkfYONoWdBY7n2TsAwuEe7j9SFoX6Njbc85lBsc72_UjIzzo4_VPO9VFC7WwcrhRWzY5axkdvpC1qRAiogOvnj6FOGjYrAsdp0igvEQuNrM25sgMUSq2v_OmVG98LH2VncIBYFO42uaHDkdJlruoCk_wE4sXnnK2gcLxWJVd-BrO_L138tMfCPOV69qoLjE2AdOI3O30kPH6JqeRKe1rbkAldppCdwmzbNK7ho-5kpWpOAOafk7GMSEOsyE9pcbZ7Zy6Mp8D6lKhsh7KbQnVWH4eEdvNvqmfWEcBI9vj3Z0fMw1fjEbl0VR497oZtJ4U_Ef1lI4Npqx9aj2e3k9ona9NMIWUP37GRCTYaY_y-GScg3wtnSG3xhmX_1IgLJwirroSvleziDaHm9ywrKBZD_38EsAACAM4-wOBAMaíra de Souza BorbaWendel de Holanda Pereira Campelohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K8570256E2&tokenCaptchar=03AGdBq267htRQ9CoWc3P21cp5R3DQTnAmb_aEytjsfKzhyenotP9AUQs7d4rBECAGgp-TH-LIRWe8LZMSvJOUm52V2pdCYGlHT5BYnSfuwHHzI5j75VjIC9JUZQiEGngw-KapXmZGRxM0o9iP9g5P3FOUDoMiSGrvLvy39IvkY-Q8Z_g9Je525H2BOqEy33OYdXk6Wr6CtzLanjxym6nX3p6E0phZP7a0X7qODzy2XGgrsU0h33abmXhRctwDWAYu0Zlt-o3nkd8Qgfupx7UmFWi5xJwUJs32Vfk5YA7zMHC9Y6aC2kO7LigcvRd3K_1SeySL2xdSWorDsnkP8EFfYybzGWdlsdHEGQ2qArMf6ZdMxRjuLCKJ5-riOu7jkg6y3Xq-GGMJwbzJco-eMTruNsmC0geelaaSjiEuzxuoBpDPexMvX5gPpF7o1Hod2mWoIjPCiYM68LwuXT4uEce5fmy0-jtULlS1lB-ZWYks0aaCTvnMrPOui48Bruna Ribeiro Martins2020-08-31T16:50:34Z2020-08-31T16:50:34Z2020-07-13http://hdl.handle.net/1843/34076O presente trabalho tem por objetivo avaliar a recepção da dúvida cartesiana da Primeira Meditação por dois autores no final do século XVII, Pierre-Daniel Huet (1630-1721) e Pierre-Sylvain Régis (1632-1707). Para isso serão consideradas primordialmente as Meditações sobre a Filosofia Primeira (1641) de Descartes (1596-1650), a Censura Philosphiae Cartesianae (1689) de Huet e a Réponse au livre qui a pour titre “P. Danielis Huetii,...Censura philosophiae cartesianae”(1691) de Régis. O que se pretende avaliar é a particularidade de cada recepção, considerando o modo como Descartes propôs a dúvida em vista dos seus propósitos. A hipótese a ser desenvolvida é a de que a crítica de Huet, autor que não aceita as consequências dogmáticas da filosofia cartesiana e considera a dúvida insuperável, é mais consistente que a defesa de Régis da filosofia cartesiana, uma vez que o autor mitiga o valor da dúvida hiperbólica em função de compromissos que tem com uma interpretação empirista do cartesianismo, que contradizem teses centrais que Descartes propõe, como a separação das vias de conhecimento e a anterioridade da via intelectiva em relação à via dos sentidos.The aim of this work is to investigate the reception of cartesian doubt by two authors of the late seventeenth century: Pierre-Daniel Huet (1630-1721) and Pierre-Sylvain Régis (1632-1707). The works to be considered are Descartes’s Meditations of First Philosophy, Huet’s Censura Philosophiae Cartesianae and Régis’s Réponse au livre qui a pour titre “P. Danielis Huetii,...Censura philosophiae cartesianae”. We will analyse the particularities of each reception, considering the doubt presented by Descartes in the First Meditation and its function in his philosophy. The hypothesis to be developed is that the reception of Huet, who denies the positive philosophy of Descartes due to the view that there is no possible certainty after Descarte’s doubt, is more consistent than the interpretation offered by Régis, who mitigate the radical value of cartesian doubt due to his compromises with an empricist view of cartesianism.FAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisporUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFMGBrasilFAF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIADescartesHuetRégisDúvidaHuet e Régis : interpretações da dúvida cartesiana em disputainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGORIGINALHuet e Régis interpretações da dúvida cartesiana em disputa.pdfHuet e Régis interpretações da dúvida cartesiana em disputa.pdfapplication/pdf2151445https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/34076/1/Huet%20e%20R%c3%a9gis%20interpreta%c3%a7%c3%b5es%20da%20d%c3%bavida%20cartesiana%20em%20disputa.pdf8a4642790fff35a64df698958c095c67MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82119https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/34076/2/license.txt34badce4be7e31e3adb4575ae96af679MD521843/340762020-08-31 13:50:34.288oai:repositorio.ufmg.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2020-08-31T16:50:34Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
|