Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/63179 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT. Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. Objectives: We aimed to verify the occurrence of the retest effect and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the follow-up scores in a sample of 5,592 participants with a diverse sociodemographic profile, who were assessed twice during 4 years of follow-up. Methods: We tested two possible approaches to correct the retest effect and calculated the Reliable Change Index. Results: We observed increased scores at the follow-up assessment after 4 years, but the results indicate a modest occurrence of retest effects. The regression difference correction successfully generated follow-up corrected scores, while the mean difference did not provide effective corrections. Sociodemographic characteristics had a minor impact on the retest. Conclusions: We recommend the regression difference correction for retest effects. The absence of this methodological approach might lead to biased results using longitudinal cognitive scores |
id |
UFMG_66f891ad6d6d78e936420e11547dc65b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/63179 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2024-01-19T22:15:01Z2024-01-19T22:15:01Z202216217118010.1590/1980-5764-dn-2021-002719805764http://hdl.handle.net/1843/63179ABSTRACT. Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. Objectives: We aimed to verify the occurrence of the retest effect and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the follow-up scores in a sample of 5,592 participants with a diverse sociodemographic profile, who were assessed twice during 4 years of follow-up. Methods: We tested two possible approaches to correct the retest effect and calculated the Reliable Change Index. Results: We observed increased scores at the follow-up assessment after 4 years, but the results indicate a modest occurrence of retest effects. The regression difference correction successfully generated follow-up corrected scores, while the mean difference did not provide effective corrections. Sociodemographic characteristics had a minor impact on the retest. Conclusions: We recommend the regression difference correction for retest effects. The absence of this methodological approach might lead to biased results using longitudinal cognitive scoresAvaliações cognitivas repetidas em estudos longitudinais favorecem a ocorrência de efeitos de retestagem ou de prática, geralmente aumentando os escores obtidos nas avaliações de acompanhamento quando comparados aos da primeira avaliação. Sendo assim, os efeitos do retestagem podem comprometer a verificação do declínio cognitivo em idosos.Objetivos: Objetivamos verificar a ocorrência do efeito de prática e o impacto das características sociodemográficas nos escores de seguimento em uma amostra de 5.592 participantes com perfil sociodemográfico diverso, avaliada duas vezes durante quatro anos de seguimento. Métodos: Testamos duas abordagens possíveis para corrigir o efeito de prática e calculamos o índice de mudança confiável. Resultados: Observamos escores sutilmente maiores na avaliação de seguimento após quatro anos, o que sugere a ocorrência de efeitos de retestagem. A correção pela diferença da regressão gerou escores corrigidos de acompanhamento satisfatórios, enquanto a correção pela diferença média não forneceu correções eficazes. As características sociodemográficas tiveram impacto mínimo no efeito de prática. Conclusões: Recomendamos a forma de correção pela diferença da regressão para efeitos de retestagem. A ausência dessa abordagem metodológica, quando utilizamos escores cognitivos longitudinais, pode levar a resultados enviesadoporUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGBrasilMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA MÉDICAMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA SOCIALDementia & NeuropsychologiaReproducibility of ResultsLongitudinal StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsLongitudinal StudiesPsychometricsRetest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approachesEFEITO DE RETESTE EM UMA AMOSTRA DIVERSA: PREDITORES SOCIODEMOGRÁFICOS E POSSÍVEIS ABORDAGENS PARA A CORREÇÃOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0027Laiss BertolaCláudia Kimie SuemotoIsabela Judith Martins BenseñorAndre Russowsky BrunoniPaulo CaramelliSandhi Maria BarretoArlinda Barbosa MorenoRosane Harter GriepMaria Carmen VianaPaulo Andrade Lotufoapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGORIGINALRetest effects in a diverse sample pdfa.pdfRetest effects in a diverse sample pdfa.pdfapplication/pdf384506https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/63179/2/Retest%20effects%20in%20a%20diverse%20sample%20pdfa.pdfd0992f5c3929a3e3b51ff724932a8f57MD52LICENSELicense.txtLicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82042https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/63179/1/License.txtfa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22MD511843/631792024-01-22 13:06:54.584oai:repositorio.ufmg.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2024-01-22T16:06:54Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
EFEITO DE RETESTE EM UMA AMOSTRA DIVERSA: PREDITORES SOCIODEMOGRÁFICOS E POSSÍVEIS ABORDAGENS PARA A CORREÇÃO |
title |
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
spellingShingle |
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches Laiss Bertola Reproducibility of Results Longitudinal Studies Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Longitudinal Studies Psychometrics |
title_short |
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title_full |
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title_fullStr |
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title_full_unstemmed |
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title_sort |
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
author |
Laiss Bertola |
author_facet |
Laiss Bertola Cláudia Kimie Suemoto Isabela Judith Martins Benseñor Andre Russowsky Brunoni Paulo Caramelli Sandhi Maria Barreto Arlinda Barbosa Moreno Rosane Harter Griep Maria Carmen Viana Paulo Andrade Lotufo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cláudia Kimie Suemoto Isabela Judith Martins Benseñor Andre Russowsky Brunoni Paulo Caramelli Sandhi Maria Barreto Arlinda Barbosa Moreno Rosane Harter Griep Maria Carmen Viana Paulo Andrade Lotufo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Laiss Bertola Cláudia Kimie Suemoto Isabela Judith Martins Benseñor Andre Russowsky Brunoni Paulo Caramelli Sandhi Maria Barreto Arlinda Barbosa Moreno Rosane Harter Griep Maria Carmen Viana Paulo Andrade Lotufo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Reproducibility of Results Longitudinal Studies Psychometrics |
topic |
Reproducibility of Results Longitudinal Studies Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Longitudinal Studies Psychometrics |
dc.subject.other.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Reproducibility of Results Longitudinal Studies Psychometrics |
description |
ABSTRACT. Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. Objectives: We aimed to verify the occurrence of the retest effect and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the follow-up scores in a sample of 5,592 participants with a diverse sociodemographic profile, who were assessed twice during 4 years of follow-up. Methods: We tested two possible approaches to correct the retest effect and calculated the Reliable Change Index. Results: We observed increased scores at the follow-up assessment after 4 years, but the results indicate a modest occurrence of retest effects. The regression difference correction successfully generated follow-up corrected scores, while the mean difference did not provide effective corrections. Sociodemographic characteristics had a minor impact on the retest. Conclusions: We recommend the regression difference correction for retest effects. The absence of this methodological approach might lead to biased results using longitudinal cognitive scores |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-19T22:15:01Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-19T22:15:01Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/63179 |
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2021-0027 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
19805764 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2021-0027 19805764 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/63179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Dementia & Neuropsychologia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFMG |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
MED - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA MÉDICA MED - DEPARTAMENTO DE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA SOCIAL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/63179/2/Retest%20effects%20in%20a%20diverse%20sample%20pdfa.pdf https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/63179/1/License.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d0992f5c3929a3e3b51ff724932a8f57 fa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1803589317290885120 |