Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald Dworkin

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rangel Mendes Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/55322
Resumo: This master's dissertation studies the conception of ethics adopted by Ronald Dworkin aiming at connecting it to the equality of resources. It is argued that, in the book Sovereign Virtue (SV) - Dworkin’s most debated and criticized work regarding justice - it is possible to identify only the definition and the endorsement of the resources as metrics of equality. A defense of the distributive equality conception, preferred by the author, in turn, can be found in the article Foundations of Liberal Equality (FLE). Therefore, in the cited book, Dworkin only presents and manifests support for the equality of resources. However, in the article FLE, Dworkin provides reasons for it to be accepted in case the reader is convinced about the superiority of the critical value model preferred by him. In order to demonstrate it, it is firstly identified the problem that motived Dworkin to write the FLE. Thereafter, the model of challenge is presented. Forward, the distributive equality problem is defined and “endorsement” is differentiated from “defense”. Furthermore, the problem of motivation for a political theory in Dworkin’s terms is presented, with the identification of the reasons why he defends that the equality of resources flows naturally from the critical value model adopted by him. Lastly, it is exposed how the repackaged utilized for the model of challenge appears in Justice for Hedgehogs (JH) - a more mature work from the author - does not impact the argument developed in FLE. In JH, the model of challenge is treated in terms of two principles of dignity, but the implications regarding the equality or resources are practically the same.
id UFMG_6f40c06e510296608750de3faf10e3d6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/55322
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald DworkinRonald DworkinIgualdade de recursosModelo de desafioTeoria da justiçaÉticaDignidadeDworkin, Ronald, 1931-2013Direito - FilosofiaLiberalismoÉticaIgualdadeThis master's dissertation studies the conception of ethics adopted by Ronald Dworkin aiming at connecting it to the equality of resources. It is argued that, in the book Sovereign Virtue (SV) - Dworkin’s most debated and criticized work regarding justice - it is possible to identify only the definition and the endorsement of the resources as metrics of equality. A defense of the distributive equality conception, preferred by the author, in turn, can be found in the article Foundations of Liberal Equality (FLE). Therefore, in the cited book, Dworkin only presents and manifests support for the equality of resources. However, in the article FLE, Dworkin provides reasons for it to be accepted in case the reader is convinced about the superiority of the critical value model preferred by him. In order to demonstrate it, it is firstly identified the problem that motived Dworkin to write the FLE. Thereafter, the model of challenge is presented. Forward, the distributive equality problem is defined and “endorsement” is differentiated from “defense”. Furthermore, the problem of motivation for a political theory in Dworkin’s terms is presented, with the identification of the reasons why he defends that the equality of resources flows naturally from the critical value model adopted by him. Lastly, it is exposed how the repackaged utilized for the model of challenge appears in Justice for Hedgehogs (JH) - a more mature work from the author - does not impact the argument developed in FLE. In JH, the model of challenge is treated in terms of two principles of dignity, but the implications regarding the equality or resources are practically the same.Esta dissertação estuda a concepção de ética adotada por Ronald Dworkin com o fim de conectá-la à igualdade de recursos. Argumenta-se que, no livro Sovereign Virtue (SV) – obra mais debatida e criticada quanto ao tema da justiça em Dworkin – identifica-se tão somente a definição e o endosso dos recursos enquanto métrica da igualdade. Uma defesa da concepção de igualdade distributiva preferida pelo autor, por sua vez, pode ser encontrada no artigo Foundations of Liberal Equality (FLE). Isto é, no livro citado, Dworkin apenas apresenta e manifesta apoio à igualdade de recursos, mas em FLE ele fornece razões para que ela seja aceita, caso o leitor esteja convencido da superioridade do modelo de valor crítico preferido pelo autor. Para que isso seja demonstrado, identifica-se, primeiramente, o problema que motivou Dworkin a escrever FLE, tratando-se a questão da força categórica, e, em seguida, expõe-se o modelo de desafio. Adiante, define-se o problema da igualdade distributiva e se distingue endosso de defesa. Além disso, apresenta-se o problema da motivação de uma teoria política nos termos de Dworkin e se identifica os motivos pelos quais ele defende que a igualdade de recursos flui naturalmente do modelo de valor crítico adotado por ele. Por fim, expõe-se como a nova roupagem com que o modelo de desafio chega a Justice for Hedgehogs (JH) – uma obra mais madura do autor – não impacta o argumento desenvolvido em FLE. Em JH, trata-se o modelo de desafio em termos de dois princípios de dignidade, mas as implicações quanto à igualdade de recursos são praticamente as mesmas.CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBrasilDIREITO - FACULDADE DE DIREITOPrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoUFMGLeandro Martins Zanitellihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4254363662704257Thomas da Rosa BustamanteLeonardo Gomes Penteado RosaLilian Furquim de Campos AndradeRangel Mendes Francisco2023-06-25T19:21:59Z2023-06-25T19:21:59Z2023-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/55322porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2023-06-25T19:21:59Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/55322Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2023-06-25T19:21:59Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald Dworkin
title Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald Dworkin
spellingShingle Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald Dworkin
Rangel Mendes Francisco
Ronald Dworkin
Igualdade de recursos
Modelo de desafio
Teoria da justiça
Ética
Dignidade
Dworkin, Ronald, 1931-2013
Direito - Filosofia
Liberalismo
Ética
Igualdade
title_short Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald Dworkin
title_full Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald Dworkin
title_fullStr Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald Dworkin
title_full_unstemmed Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald Dworkin
title_sort Ética e igualdade distributiva em Ronald Dworkin
author Rangel Mendes Francisco
author_facet Rangel Mendes Francisco
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Leandro Martins Zanitelli
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4254363662704257
Thomas da Rosa Bustamante
Leonardo Gomes Penteado Rosa
Lilian Furquim de Campos Andrade
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rangel Mendes Francisco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ronald Dworkin
Igualdade de recursos
Modelo de desafio
Teoria da justiça
Ética
Dignidade
Dworkin, Ronald, 1931-2013
Direito - Filosofia
Liberalismo
Ética
Igualdade
topic Ronald Dworkin
Igualdade de recursos
Modelo de desafio
Teoria da justiça
Ética
Dignidade
Dworkin, Ronald, 1931-2013
Direito - Filosofia
Liberalismo
Ética
Igualdade
description This master's dissertation studies the conception of ethics adopted by Ronald Dworkin aiming at connecting it to the equality of resources. It is argued that, in the book Sovereign Virtue (SV) - Dworkin’s most debated and criticized work regarding justice - it is possible to identify only the definition and the endorsement of the resources as metrics of equality. A defense of the distributive equality conception, preferred by the author, in turn, can be found in the article Foundations of Liberal Equality (FLE). Therefore, in the cited book, Dworkin only presents and manifests support for the equality of resources. However, in the article FLE, Dworkin provides reasons for it to be accepted in case the reader is convinced about the superiority of the critical value model preferred by him. In order to demonstrate it, it is firstly identified the problem that motived Dworkin to write the FLE. Thereafter, the model of challenge is presented. Forward, the distributive equality problem is defined and “endorsement” is differentiated from “defense”. Furthermore, the problem of motivation for a political theory in Dworkin’s terms is presented, with the identification of the reasons why he defends that the equality of resources flows naturally from the critical value model adopted by him. Lastly, it is exposed how the repackaged utilized for the model of challenge appears in Justice for Hedgehogs (JH) - a more mature work from the author - does not impact the argument developed in FLE. In JH, the model of challenge is treated in terms of two principles of dignity, but the implications regarding the equality or resources are practically the same.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-25T19:21:59Z
2023-06-25T19:21:59Z
2023-05-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1843/55322
url http://hdl.handle.net/1843/55322
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Brasil
DIREITO - FACULDADE DE DIREITO
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
UFMG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Brasil
DIREITO - FACULDADE DE DIREITO
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
UFMG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1816829907005603840