Evaluation of remote teaching in master programs in the oral pathology and oral medicine during the covid-19 pandemic. brazilian multicentric study

• Autor(a) principal: Fabrício Emanuel Soares de Oliveira
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Nelson Pereira Marques, Daniella Reis Barbosa Martelli, Lucas Alves Trindade França, Ludmila Ketlen Soares de Oliveira, Maria Isabela Soares de Alencar Monteiro, Pablo Agustin Vargas, Maria Cássia Ferreira de Aguiar, Jean Nunes dos Santos, Janete Dias Almeida, Hercilio Martelli Júnior
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
• Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.4317%2Fmedoral.26004; http://hdl.handle.net/1843/74888; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-2685
• topic: COVID-19; Pandemics; Pandemics; Covid-19; Education, distance; Evaluation study

Background: With the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a need to adopt online teaching methods in a generalized and sudden way, a situation that led to unprecedented changes in the routine of post-graduate students and research development. This study aimed to analyze the evaluation of remote teaching by graduates of master's degrees and advisors in master's programs in the Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine who needed to adapt to a remote teaching methodology in the pandemic. Material and methods: This quantitative study evaluated the remote teaching in the perception of master's graduates and advisors from postgraduate programs in Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine. Data were collected through an online Google forms® questionnaire. Results: Participated in the study 14 master graduates and 14 master's advisors. Master graduates evaluated that the professors had a good performance (p=0.001), that the duration of the classes was adequate (p=0.015), that the interaction with professors was satisfactory (p=0.007), that they had good interaction with the advisor (p=0.001), that they were satisfied with the remote guidance process (p=0.038) and that face-to-face practical activities were missed (p=0.002). Master's advisors reported satisfaction with remote teaching, good adaptation (p=0.018) and motivation for remote teaching (p=0.016), they evaluated that students were cooperative in activities (p=0.019) and that face-to-face practical activities were missed (p=0.002). Conclusions: Despite the difficulties, remote teaching proved to be an effective alternative to face-to-face teaching.