Evaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: JOAO FREDERICO BERNER
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMS
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/5058
Resumo: In this work Ecological Niche Models were built using the occurrence records of nine species of the endemic South American whip-spider genus Heterophrynus. With this dataset, we tested the use and compared performance and output similarity of three climatic datasets (BioClim, MERRAclim and ENVIREM) and eight algorithms (RF, BRT, SVM, MaxEnt, MaxLike, GLM, GLMNet and MARS) under three M sizes for each of the nine species. Furthermore, we used one of the climatic datasets, BioClim, to build and project models for two end-of-century SSP scenarios and quantify suitable area lying inside Protected Areas (National Parks and Indigenous Land) in each scenario. Our results suggest MERRAclim is the most dissimilar from other climatic datasets, and that the interpolation artifacts in both BioClim and ENVIREM dictate model output in the Amazon Basin. In our analyses, the algorithms RF and MARS overfitted models, while GLM, GLMNet and MaxLike underfitted models given tested settings. We further illustrate how AUC and TSS statistics are uninformative as evaluation methods for presence-background or presence-pseudoabsence models. We found that Indigenous Land or Territories cover as much suitable area as Integral Protection Areas on average. Some species are estimated to lose over two thirds of their current suitable area by the end of the century, while others to have their suitable area more than doubled. From our conclusions, we emphasize that the use of a single climatic dataset, GCM and/or algorithm should be avoided. Furthermore, we suggest that defining M should be based on building a few models a priori with different M sizes and selecting the one with the best performance and best fit for intended model use.
id UFMS_13eb48fec0de884c9b7700719f0b489b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufms.br:123456789/5058
network_acronym_str UFMS
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMS
repository_id_str 2124
spelling 2022-08-31T01:28:20Z2022-08-31T01:28:20Z2022https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/5058In this work Ecological Niche Models were built using the occurrence records of nine species of the endemic South American whip-spider genus Heterophrynus. With this dataset, we tested the use and compared performance and output similarity of three climatic datasets (BioClim, MERRAclim and ENVIREM) and eight algorithms (RF, BRT, SVM, MaxEnt, MaxLike, GLM, GLMNet and MARS) under three M sizes for each of the nine species. Furthermore, we used one of the climatic datasets, BioClim, to build and project models for two end-of-century SSP scenarios and quantify suitable area lying inside Protected Areas (National Parks and Indigenous Land) in each scenario. Our results suggest MERRAclim is the most dissimilar from other climatic datasets, and that the interpolation artifacts in both BioClim and ENVIREM dictate model output in the Amazon Basin. In our analyses, the algorithms RF and MARS overfitted models, while GLM, GLMNet and MaxLike underfitted models given tested settings. We further illustrate how AUC and TSS statistics are uninformative as evaluation methods for presence-background or presence-pseudoabsence models. We found that Indigenous Land or Territories cover as much suitable area as Integral Protection Areas on average. Some species are estimated to lose over two thirds of their current suitable area by the end of the century, while others to have their suitable area more than doubled. From our conclusions, we emphasize that the use of a single climatic dataset, GCM and/or algorithm should be avoided. Furthermore, we suggest that defining M should be based on building a few models a priori with different M sizes and selecting the one with the best performance and best fit for intended model use.Construímos Modelos de Nicho Ecológico utilizando os dados de ocorrência de nove espécies do amblipígeo Heterophrynus, endêmico da América do Sul. Testamos e comparamos a performance a a similaridade do output de três conjuntos de dados climáticos e nove algoritmos sob três tamanhos de M para cada espécie. Além disso, utilizamos um dos conjuntos de dados climáticos, BioClim, para construir e projetar modelos para dois cenários SSP ao final do século, e quantificamos a área com adequabilidade climática dentro de Áreas de Conservação em cada cenário. Nossos resultados sugerem que MERRAclim é o conjunto de dados climático mais dessemelhante dos outros testados, e que artefatos de interpolação em ambos os conjuntos BioClim e ENVIREM ditam o output dos modelos na bacia amazônica. Em nossas análises, os algoritmos RF e MARS sobreajustaram os modelos, enquanto GLM, GLMNet e MaxLike subajustaram os modelos dadas as configurações testadas. Nós demonstramos como as estatísticas AUC e TSS são pouco informativas como método de avaliação de modelos presença-fundo ou presença-pseudoausência. Encontramos que Terras Indígenas cobrem em média tanta área climaticamente adequada quanto Áreas de Proteção Integral. Algumas espécies perderão mais de dois terços da sua área de adequebilidade climátical atual, enquanto outras terão essa área mais do que duplicada até o final do século. De nossas conclusões, enfatizamos que o uso de um único conjunto de dados climático, modelo de circulação global e/ou algoritmo deve ser evitado. Além disso, sugerimos que a definição de M deve ser baseada na construção de alguns modelos a priori com diferentes tamanhos de M e selecionando o com melhor performance e que melhor se ajusta ao uso pretendido do modelo.Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do SulUFMSBrasilAmérica do SulCurva de Acumulação de OcorrênciasModelos de Nicho EcológicoSeleção de algoritmosEvaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case studyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisGustavo GraciolliJOAO FREDERICO BERNERinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMSinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)instacron:UFMSORIGINALDissertacao_JFB.pdfDissertacao_JFB.pdfapplication/pdf15717761https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/5058/-1/Dissertacao_JFB.pdf078e71396c650b8c8018df636334b900MD5-1123456789/50582022-08-30 21:28:21.61oai:repositorio.ufms.br:123456789/5058Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufms.br/oai/requestri.prograd@ufms.bropendoar:21242022-08-31T01:28:21Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Evaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case study
title Evaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case study
spellingShingle Evaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case study
JOAO FREDERICO BERNER
América do Sul
Curva de Acumulação de Ocorrências
Modelos de Nicho Ecológico
Seleção de algoritmos
title_short Evaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case study
title_full Evaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case study
title_fullStr Evaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case study
title_sort Evaluation and Performance of Ecological Niche Models in South America: a whip-spider case study
author JOAO FREDERICO BERNER
author_facet JOAO FREDERICO BERNER
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Gustavo Graciolli
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv JOAO FREDERICO BERNER
contributor_str_mv Gustavo Graciolli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv América do Sul
Curva de Acumulação de Ocorrências
Modelos de Nicho Ecológico
Seleção de algoritmos
topic América do Sul
Curva de Acumulação de Ocorrências
Modelos de Nicho Ecológico
Seleção de algoritmos
description In this work Ecological Niche Models were built using the occurrence records of nine species of the endemic South American whip-spider genus Heterophrynus. With this dataset, we tested the use and compared performance and output similarity of three climatic datasets (BioClim, MERRAclim and ENVIREM) and eight algorithms (RF, BRT, SVM, MaxEnt, MaxLike, GLM, GLMNet and MARS) under three M sizes for each of the nine species. Furthermore, we used one of the climatic datasets, BioClim, to build and project models for two end-of-century SSP scenarios and quantify suitable area lying inside Protected Areas (National Parks and Indigenous Land) in each scenario. Our results suggest MERRAclim is the most dissimilar from other climatic datasets, and that the interpolation artifacts in both BioClim and ENVIREM dictate model output in the Amazon Basin. In our analyses, the algorithms RF and MARS overfitted models, while GLM, GLMNet and MaxLike underfitted models given tested settings. We further illustrate how AUC and TSS statistics are uninformative as evaluation methods for presence-background or presence-pseudoabsence models. We found that Indigenous Land or Territories cover as much suitable area as Integral Protection Areas on average. Some species are estimated to lose over two thirds of their current suitable area by the end of the century, while others to have their suitable area more than doubled. From our conclusions, we emphasize that the use of a single climatic dataset, GCM and/or algorithm should be avoided. Furthermore, we suggest that defining M should be based on building a few models a priori with different M sizes and selecting the one with the best performance and best fit for intended model use.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-08-31T01:28:20Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-08-31T01:28:20Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/5058
url https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/5058
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMS
instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron:UFMS
instname_str Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron_str UFMS
institution UFMS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/5058/-1/Dissertacao_JFB.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 078e71396c650b8c8018df636334b900
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri.prograd@ufms.br
_version_ 1801678595448373248