Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
Texto Completo: http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/2199
Resumo: The main objective of this work is to present the resolutions of the Geometry questions in the area of Mathematics and its Technologies of ENEM 2020, through analyzes carried out under the perspective of Van Hiele Theory and Raymond Duval Theory. Both theories focus on teaching and learning Geometry, seeking to help the teacher, reduce their possible difficulties in the teaching process of this content, and direct the development of student learning. So, the work had as methodology to seek a theoretical framework of the two theories, through the Semantic Fields Model, which allowed us to have a plausible reading when solving the selected questions, under the eyes of Duval and Van Hiele. Using the Theory of Semiotic Representation Records, the types of records used to solve each question were cataloged, the types of looks we had to identify the objects brought by each problem were analyzed, and the necessary apprehensions to find the solutions for each question . According to Van Hiele's theory, the questions were solved by the necessary skills of each level required for each problem, according to the characteristics of their respective levels, as shown in this theoretical model. As much as the two theories approach the teaching of Geometry, each has a different look; in this way, it was shown how each resolution behaves towards each theory. Therefore, the catalogings of ENEM questions were analyzed, which were resolved considering Van Hiele levels and Duval's Theory, showing and identifying the differences that each model has from one another. Thus, the considerations obtained in carrying out the work are brought up, raising questions that involve the teaching and learning of Geometry in the face of both theories, addressing its advantages and disadvantages that we found when working with both models.
id UFMT-1_45563024ca7fd3065c1f37b815938189
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/2199
network_acronym_str UFMT-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
repository_id_str
spelling Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond DuvalCNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICAENEMEnsino e aprendizagemGeometriaTeoria dos RegistrosTeoria de Van HieleRepresentação SemióticaENEMTeaching and learningGeometryRecords TheoryVan Hiele TheorySemiotic RepresentationThe main objective of this work is to present the resolutions of the Geometry questions in the area of Mathematics and its Technologies of ENEM 2020, through analyzes carried out under the perspective of Van Hiele Theory and Raymond Duval Theory. Both theories focus on teaching and learning Geometry, seeking to help the teacher, reduce their possible difficulties in the teaching process of this content, and direct the development of student learning. So, the work had as methodology to seek a theoretical framework of the two theories, through the Semantic Fields Model, which allowed us to have a plausible reading when solving the selected questions, under the eyes of Duval and Van Hiele. Using the Theory of Semiotic Representation Records, the types of records used to solve each question were cataloged, the types of looks we had to identify the objects brought by each problem were analyzed, and the necessary apprehensions to find the solutions for each question . According to Van Hiele's theory, the questions were solved by the necessary skills of each level required for each problem, according to the characteristics of their respective levels, as shown in this theoretical model. As much as the two theories approach the teaching of Geometry, each has a different look; in this way, it was shown how each resolution behaves towards each theory. Therefore, the catalogings of ENEM questions were analyzed, which were resolved considering Van Hiele levels and Duval's Theory, showing and identifying the differences that each model has from one another. Thus, the considerations obtained in carrying out the work are brought up, raising questions that involve the teaching and learning of Geometry in the face of both theories, addressing its advantages and disadvantages that we found when working with both models.O presente trabalho tem como principal objetivo apresentar as resoluções das questões de Geometria da área de Matemática e suas Tecnologias do ENEM 2020, por análises realizadas sob a perspectiva da Teoria de Van Hiele e da Teoria da Raymond Duval. Ambas as teorias têm enfoque no ensino e aprendizagem de Geometria, buscam auxiliar o professor, diminuir suas possíveis dificuldades no processo de ensino desse conteúdo, e direcionar o desenvolvimento da aprendizagem do aluno. Então, o trabalho teve como metodologia buscar um referencial teórico das duas teorias, por meio do Modelo dos Campos Semânticos que nos permitiu ter uma leitura plausível ao resolver as questões selecionadas, sob os olhares de Duval e Van Hiele. Pela Teoria dos Registros de Representação Semiótica, foram catalogados os tipos de registros utilizados para a resolução de cada questão, foram analisados os tipos de olhares que tivemos para identificar os objetos trazidos por cada problema, e as apreensões necessárias para encontrar as soluções de cada questão. Já pela teoria de Van Hiele, as questões foram resolvidas pelas habilidades necessárias de cada nível exigido para cada problema, de acordo com as características de seus respectivos níveis, conforme consta nesse modelo teórico. Por mais que as duas teorias abordem o ensino de Geometria, cada uma tem um olhar diferente; dessa forma, foi mostrado como que cada resolução se comporta perante cada teoria. Por isso, foram analisadas as catalogações das questões do ENEM que foram resolvidas considerando os níveis de Van Hiele e a Teoria de Duval, mostrando e identificando as diferenças que cada modelo tem um do outro. Assim, é trazido as considerações que se obteve na realização do trabalho, levantando indagações que envolve o ensino e aprendizagem da Geometria frente as duas teorias, abordando as suas vantagens e desvantagens que encontramos ao trabalhar com os dois modelos.Universidade Federal de Mato GrossoBrasilInstituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais (ICNHS) – SinopUFMT CUS - SinopMatemática - CUSBarbosa, Edson Pereirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3184651096945519Barbosa, Edson Pereirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3184651096945519Trevisan, Eberson Paulohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3701989564065584Laier, Simone Simionato dos SantosSilva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da2022-03-07T20:10:06Z2021-10-082022-03-07T20:10:06Z2021-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/datasetSILVA, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da. Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval. 2020. 116f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Licenciatura em Ciências Naturais e Matemática – Habilitação em Matemática – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais, Sinop, 2020.http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/2199porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMTinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)instacron:UFMT2022-03-15T07:00:58Zoai:localhost:1/2199Biblioteca Digital de Monografiahttps://bdm.ufmt.br/PUBhttp://200.129.241.122/oai/requestopendoar:2022-03-15T07:00:58falseBiblioteca Digital de Monografiahttps://bdm.ufmt.br/PUBhttp://200.129.241.122/oai/requestbibliotecacentral@ufmt.br||opendoar:2022-03-15T07:00:58Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval
title Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval
spellingShingle Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval
Silva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da
CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA
ENEM
Ensino e aprendizagem
Geometria
Teoria dos Registros
Teoria de Van Hiele
Representação Semiótica
ENEM
Teaching and learning
Geometry
Records Theory
Van Hiele Theory
Semiotic Representation
title_short Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval
title_full Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval
title_fullStr Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval
title_full_unstemmed Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval
title_sort Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval
author Silva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da
author_facet Silva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Barbosa, Edson Pereira
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3184651096945519
Barbosa, Edson Pereira
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3184651096945519
Trevisan, Eberson Paulo
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3701989564065584
Laier, Simone Simionato dos Santos
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA
ENEM
Ensino e aprendizagem
Geometria
Teoria dos Registros
Teoria de Van Hiele
Representação Semiótica
ENEM
Teaching and learning
Geometry
Records Theory
Van Hiele Theory
Semiotic Representation
topic CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA
ENEM
Ensino e aprendizagem
Geometria
Teoria dos Registros
Teoria de Van Hiele
Representação Semiótica
ENEM
Teaching and learning
Geometry
Records Theory
Van Hiele Theory
Semiotic Representation
description The main objective of this work is to present the resolutions of the Geometry questions in the area of Mathematics and its Technologies of ENEM 2020, through analyzes carried out under the perspective of Van Hiele Theory and Raymond Duval Theory. Both theories focus on teaching and learning Geometry, seeking to help the teacher, reduce their possible difficulties in the teaching process of this content, and direct the development of student learning. So, the work had as methodology to seek a theoretical framework of the two theories, through the Semantic Fields Model, which allowed us to have a plausible reading when solving the selected questions, under the eyes of Duval and Van Hiele. Using the Theory of Semiotic Representation Records, the types of records used to solve each question were cataloged, the types of looks we had to identify the objects brought by each problem were analyzed, and the necessary apprehensions to find the solutions for each question . According to Van Hiele's theory, the questions were solved by the necessary skills of each level required for each problem, according to the characteristics of their respective levels, as shown in this theoretical model. As much as the two theories approach the teaching of Geometry, each has a different look; in this way, it was shown how each resolution behaves towards each theory. Therefore, the catalogings of ENEM questions were analyzed, which were resolved considering Van Hiele levels and Duval's Theory, showing and identifying the differences that each model has from one another. Thus, the considerations obtained in carrying out the work are brought up, raising questions that involve the teaching and learning of Geometry in the face of both theories, addressing its advantages and disadvantages that we found when working with both models.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-08
2021-09-30
2022-03-07T20:10:06Z
2022-03-07T20:10:06Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/dataset
format bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv SILVA, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da. Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval. 2020. 116f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Licenciatura em Ciências Naturais e Matemática – Habilitação em Matemática – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais, Sinop, 2020.
http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/2199
identifier_str_mv SILVA, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da. Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval. 2020. 116f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Licenciatura em Ciências Naturais e Matemática – Habilitação em Matemática – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais, Sinop, 2020.
url http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/2199
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Brasil
Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais (ICNHS) – Sinop
UFMT CUS - Sinop
Matemática - CUS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Brasil
Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais (ICNHS) – Sinop
UFMT CUS - Sinop
Matemática - CUS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
instacron:UFMT
instname_str Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
instacron_str UFMT
institution UFMT
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
collection Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecacentral@ufmt.br||
_version_ 1813012957657825280