Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT |
Texto Completo: | http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/2199 |
Resumo: | The main objective of this work is to present the resolutions of the Geometry questions in the area of Mathematics and its Technologies of ENEM 2020, through analyzes carried out under the perspective of Van Hiele Theory and Raymond Duval Theory. Both theories focus on teaching and learning Geometry, seeking to help the teacher, reduce their possible difficulties in the teaching process of this content, and direct the development of student learning. So, the work had as methodology to seek a theoretical framework of the two theories, through the Semantic Fields Model, which allowed us to have a plausible reading when solving the selected questions, under the eyes of Duval and Van Hiele. Using the Theory of Semiotic Representation Records, the types of records used to solve each question were cataloged, the types of looks we had to identify the objects brought by each problem were analyzed, and the necessary apprehensions to find the solutions for each question . According to Van Hiele's theory, the questions were solved by the necessary skills of each level required for each problem, according to the characteristics of their respective levels, as shown in this theoretical model. As much as the two theories approach the teaching of Geometry, each has a different look; in this way, it was shown how each resolution behaves towards each theory. Therefore, the catalogings of ENEM questions were analyzed, which were resolved considering Van Hiele levels and Duval's Theory, showing and identifying the differences that each model has from one another. Thus, the considerations obtained in carrying out the work are brought up, raising questions that involve the teaching and learning of Geometry in the face of both theories, addressing its advantages and disadvantages that we found when working with both models. |
id |
UFMT-1_45563024ca7fd3065c1f37b815938189 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:1/2199 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMT-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond DuvalCNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICAENEMEnsino e aprendizagemGeometriaTeoria dos RegistrosTeoria de Van HieleRepresentação SemióticaENEMTeaching and learningGeometryRecords TheoryVan Hiele TheorySemiotic RepresentationThe main objective of this work is to present the resolutions of the Geometry questions in the area of Mathematics and its Technologies of ENEM 2020, through analyzes carried out under the perspective of Van Hiele Theory and Raymond Duval Theory. Both theories focus on teaching and learning Geometry, seeking to help the teacher, reduce their possible difficulties in the teaching process of this content, and direct the development of student learning. So, the work had as methodology to seek a theoretical framework of the two theories, through the Semantic Fields Model, which allowed us to have a plausible reading when solving the selected questions, under the eyes of Duval and Van Hiele. Using the Theory of Semiotic Representation Records, the types of records used to solve each question were cataloged, the types of looks we had to identify the objects brought by each problem were analyzed, and the necessary apprehensions to find the solutions for each question . According to Van Hiele's theory, the questions were solved by the necessary skills of each level required for each problem, according to the characteristics of their respective levels, as shown in this theoretical model. As much as the two theories approach the teaching of Geometry, each has a different look; in this way, it was shown how each resolution behaves towards each theory. Therefore, the catalogings of ENEM questions were analyzed, which were resolved considering Van Hiele levels and Duval's Theory, showing and identifying the differences that each model has from one another. Thus, the considerations obtained in carrying out the work are brought up, raising questions that involve the teaching and learning of Geometry in the face of both theories, addressing its advantages and disadvantages that we found when working with both models.O presente trabalho tem como principal objetivo apresentar as resoluções das questões de Geometria da área de Matemática e suas Tecnologias do ENEM 2020, por análises realizadas sob a perspectiva da Teoria de Van Hiele e da Teoria da Raymond Duval. Ambas as teorias têm enfoque no ensino e aprendizagem de Geometria, buscam auxiliar o professor, diminuir suas possíveis dificuldades no processo de ensino desse conteúdo, e direcionar o desenvolvimento da aprendizagem do aluno. Então, o trabalho teve como metodologia buscar um referencial teórico das duas teorias, por meio do Modelo dos Campos Semânticos que nos permitiu ter uma leitura plausível ao resolver as questões selecionadas, sob os olhares de Duval e Van Hiele. Pela Teoria dos Registros de Representação Semiótica, foram catalogados os tipos de registros utilizados para a resolução de cada questão, foram analisados os tipos de olhares que tivemos para identificar os objetos trazidos por cada problema, e as apreensões necessárias para encontrar as soluções de cada questão. Já pela teoria de Van Hiele, as questões foram resolvidas pelas habilidades necessárias de cada nível exigido para cada problema, de acordo com as características de seus respectivos níveis, conforme consta nesse modelo teórico. Por mais que as duas teorias abordem o ensino de Geometria, cada uma tem um olhar diferente; dessa forma, foi mostrado como que cada resolução se comporta perante cada teoria. Por isso, foram analisadas as catalogações das questões do ENEM que foram resolvidas considerando os níveis de Van Hiele e a Teoria de Duval, mostrando e identificando as diferenças que cada modelo tem um do outro. Assim, é trazido as considerações que se obteve na realização do trabalho, levantando indagações que envolve o ensino e aprendizagem da Geometria frente as duas teorias, abordando as suas vantagens e desvantagens que encontramos ao trabalhar com os dois modelos.Universidade Federal de Mato GrossoBrasilInstituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais (ICNHS) – SinopUFMT CUS - SinopMatemática - CUSBarbosa, Edson Pereirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3184651096945519Barbosa, Edson Pereirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3184651096945519Trevisan, Eberson Paulohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3701989564065584Laier, Simone Simionato dos SantosSilva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da2022-03-07T20:10:06Z2021-10-082022-03-07T20:10:06Z2021-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/datasetSILVA, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da. Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval. 2020. 116f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Licenciatura em Ciências Naturais e Matemática – Habilitação em Matemática – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais, Sinop, 2020.http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/2199porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMTinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)instacron:UFMT2022-03-15T07:00:58Zoai:localhost:1/2199Biblioteca Digital de Monografiahttps://bdm.ufmt.br/PUBhttp://200.129.241.122/oai/requestopendoar:2022-03-15T07:00:58falseBiblioteca Digital de Monografiahttps://bdm.ufmt.br/PUBhttp://200.129.241.122/oai/requestbibliotecacentral@ufmt.br||opendoar:2022-03-15T07:00:58Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval |
title |
Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval |
spellingShingle |
Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval Silva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA ENEM Ensino e aprendizagem Geometria Teoria dos Registros Teoria de Van Hiele Representação Semiótica ENEM Teaching and learning Geometry Records Theory Van Hiele Theory Semiotic Representation |
title_short |
Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval |
title_full |
Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval |
title_fullStr |
Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval |
title_full_unstemmed |
Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval |
title_sort |
Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval |
author |
Silva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da |
author_facet |
Silva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Edson Pereira http://lattes.cnpq.br/3184651096945519 Barbosa, Edson Pereira http://lattes.cnpq.br/3184651096945519 Trevisan, Eberson Paulo http://lattes.cnpq.br/3701989564065584 Laier, Simone Simionato dos Santos |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA ENEM Ensino e aprendizagem Geometria Teoria dos Registros Teoria de Van Hiele Representação Semiótica ENEM Teaching and learning Geometry Records Theory Van Hiele Theory Semiotic Representation |
topic |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA ENEM Ensino e aprendizagem Geometria Teoria dos Registros Teoria de Van Hiele Representação Semiótica ENEM Teaching and learning Geometry Records Theory Van Hiele Theory Semiotic Representation |
description |
The main objective of this work is to present the resolutions of the Geometry questions in the area of Mathematics and its Technologies of ENEM 2020, through analyzes carried out under the perspective of Van Hiele Theory and Raymond Duval Theory. Both theories focus on teaching and learning Geometry, seeking to help the teacher, reduce their possible difficulties in the teaching process of this content, and direct the development of student learning. So, the work had as methodology to seek a theoretical framework of the two theories, through the Semantic Fields Model, which allowed us to have a plausible reading when solving the selected questions, under the eyes of Duval and Van Hiele. Using the Theory of Semiotic Representation Records, the types of records used to solve each question were cataloged, the types of looks we had to identify the objects brought by each problem were analyzed, and the necessary apprehensions to find the solutions for each question . According to Van Hiele's theory, the questions were solved by the necessary skills of each level required for each problem, according to the characteristics of their respective levels, as shown in this theoretical model. As much as the two theories approach the teaching of Geometry, each has a different look; in this way, it was shown how each resolution behaves towards each theory. Therefore, the catalogings of ENEM questions were analyzed, which were resolved considering Van Hiele levels and Duval's Theory, showing and identifying the differences that each model has from one another. Thus, the considerations obtained in carrying out the work are brought up, raising questions that involve the teaching and learning of Geometry in the face of both theories, addressing its advantages and disadvantages that we found when working with both models. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-08 2021-09-30 2022-03-07T20:10:06Z 2022-03-07T20:10:06Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/dataset |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da. Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval. 2020. 116f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Licenciatura em Ciências Naturais e Matemática – Habilitação em Matemática – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais, Sinop, 2020. http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/2199 |
identifier_str_mv |
SILVA, Gessyca Nayara Santos Souto da. Análise das questões de geometria do ENEM 2020, sob a perspectiva de Van Hiele e a de Raymond Duval. 2020. 116f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Licenciatura em Ciências Naturais e Matemática – Habilitação em Matemática – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais, Sinop, 2020. |
url |
http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/2199 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Brasil Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais (ICNHS) – Sinop UFMT CUS - Sinop Matemática - CUS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Brasil Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais (ICNHS) – Sinop UFMT CUS - Sinop Matemática - CUS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) instacron:UFMT |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) |
instacron_str |
UFMT |
institution |
UFMT |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliotecacentral@ufmt.br|| |
_version_ |
1813012957657825280 |