A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Reamec |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800 |
Resumo: | This article refers to the results of a research about the argumentation in Teaching Sciences and Biology. Its singularity is in the building of the Mixed Teaching Model (MTM), setting as target to identify if the MTM created enables the students of nineth class of Fundamental School and the third class of High School to build quality argumentation and verify what is the place and the relation between the narrative and the argumentation. As regard to the methodology, the research is a kind of intervention thru didactic sequences, besides getting initial diagnosis of the conception and the argumentative skill by the application of a questionnaire and get new conceptions thru the performance of a focal group after the MTM intervention. As to the obtained results, they were relevant as to the quality of the arguments as well the argumentations, because there was an enhance in quality as the MTM was developed in its phases and, when analyzed the constructions of the students, it was noticed an enhance in the quality of the structure and arguments content and the argumentations once the quality level (AQL) in the nineth class of Fundamental School went from level 1 to level 5, with the intervention of the MTM. In third class of High School, the AQL went from level 2 to level 5. From the MTM, it was also possible to place and identify what is the relation between explanation and narrative with argumentation. |
id |
UFMT-5_4046f5922bd92243bc01e24411019f79 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br:article/10800 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMT-5 |
network_name_str |
Revista Reamec |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS UM MODELO DIDÁTICO MISTO PARA A ARGUMENTAÇÃO NO ENSINO DE CIÊNCIAS E BIOLOGIA: PARA ALÉM DAS TENDENCIOSIDADESArgumentação. Ensino de Ciências e Biologia. Modelo Didático Misto. Toulmin. BoniniArgumentationSciences and Biology TeachingMixed Teaching ModelToulminBonini This article refers to the results of a research about the argumentation in Teaching Sciences and Biology. Its singularity is in the building of the Mixed Teaching Model (MTM), setting as target to identify if the MTM created enables the students of nineth class of Fundamental School and the third class of High School to build quality argumentation and verify what is the place and the relation between the narrative and the argumentation. As regard to the methodology, the research is a kind of intervention thru didactic sequences, besides getting initial diagnosis of the conception and the argumentative skill by the application of a questionnaire and get new conceptions thru the performance of a focal group after the MTM intervention. As to the obtained results, they were relevant as to the quality of the arguments as well the argumentations, because there was an enhance in quality as the MTM was developed in its phases and, when analyzed the constructions of the students, it was noticed an enhance in the quality of the structure and arguments content and the argumentations once the quality level (AQL) in the nineth class of Fundamental School went from level 1 to level 5, with the intervention of the MTM. In third class of High School, the AQL went from level 2 to level 5. From the MTM, it was also possible to place and identify what is the relation between explanation and narrative with argumentation. Este artigo se refere aos resultados de uma pesquisa sobre a argumentação no ensino de Ciências e de Biologia. Sua singularidade está na construção de um Modelo Didático Misto (MDM), tendo como objetivo identificar se o MDM criado possibilita em alunos do nono ano do Ensino Fundamental e na terceira série do Ensino Médio a construção da argumentação de qualidade. Deve também verificar qual é o lugar e a relação entre explicação e narração com argumentação. Quanto à metodologia, a pesquisa é do tipo intervenção por intermédio de sequências didáticas, além da obtenção do diagnóstico inicial de concepção e habilidade argumentativa pela aplicação de questionário e obtenção de novas concepções, por meio da realização de um grupo focal pós-intervenção do MDM. Quanto aos resultados obtidos, esses foram relevantes tanto para a qualidade dos argumentos como das argumentações, pois houve um avanço de qualidade à medida que o MDM foi desenvolvido em suas fases e, quando analisadas as construções dos discentes, se constatou que houve avanço de qualidade estrutural e de conteúdo dos argumentos e das argumentações, uma vez que o nível de qualidade (NQA) nos alunos do nono ano do Ensino Fundamental avançou do nível 1 para o nível 5 com a intervenção do MDM. Na terceira série do Ensino Médio, o NQA avançou de 2 para 5. A partir do MDM, também foi possível posicionar o lugar e identificar qual é a relação entre explicação e narração com argumentação. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)2020-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/ziphttps://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/1080010.26571/reamec.v8i3.10800 REAMEC - Red Amazónica de Educación en Ciencias y Matemáticas; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2020): Setembro a dezembro de 2020 ; 342-361REAMEC - Rede Amazônica de Educação em Ciências e Matemática; v. 8 n. 3 (2020): Setembro a dezembro de 2020 ; 342-361REAMEC Journal - Amazonian Network of Mathematical Education; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): Setembro a dezembro de 2020 ; 342-3612318-6674reponame:Revista Reamecinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)instacron:UFMTporhttps://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/7561https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8823https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8824https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8825https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8727https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8822Copyright (c) 2020 REAMEC - Rede Amazônica de Educação em Ciências e Matemáticahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPezarini, Agnaldo RonieMaciel, Maria Delourdes2021-01-02T19:18:11Zoai:periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br:article/10800Revistahttp://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/indexPUBhttp://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/oairevistareamec@gmail.com||2318-66742318-6674opendoar:2021-01-02T19:18:11Revista Reamec - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS UM MODELO DIDÁTICO MISTO PARA A ARGUMENTAÇÃO NO ENSINO DE CIÊNCIAS E BIOLOGIA: PARA ALÉM DAS TENDENCIOSIDADES |
title |
A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS |
spellingShingle |
A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS Pezarini, Agnaldo Ronie Argumentação. Ensino de Ciências e Biologia. Modelo Didático Misto. Toulmin. Bonini Argumentation Sciences and Biology Teaching Mixed Teaching Model Toulmin Bonini |
title_short |
A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS |
title_full |
A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS |
title_fullStr |
A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS |
title_full_unstemmed |
A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS |
title_sort |
A MIXED DIDACTIC MODEL TO THE ARGUMENTATION ON TEACHING SCIENCES AND BIOLOGY: ABOVE THE TRENDS |
author |
Pezarini, Agnaldo Ronie |
author_facet |
Pezarini, Agnaldo Ronie Maciel, Maria Delourdes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Maciel, Maria Delourdes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pezarini, Agnaldo Ronie Maciel, Maria Delourdes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Argumentação. Ensino de Ciências e Biologia. Modelo Didático Misto. Toulmin. Bonini Argumentation Sciences and Biology Teaching Mixed Teaching Model Toulmin Bonini |
topic |
Argumentação. Ensino de Ciências e Biologia. Modelo Didático Misto. Toulmin. Bonini Argumentation Sciences and Biology Teaching Mixed Teaching Model Toulmin Bonini |
description |
This article refers to the results of a research about the argumentation in Teaching Sciences and Biology. Its singularity is in the building of the Mixed Teaching Model (MTM), setting as target to identify if the MTM created enables the students of nineth class of Fundamental School and the third class of High School to build quality argumentation and verify what is the place and the relation between the narrative and the argumentation. As regard to the methodology, the research is a kind of intervention thru didactic sequences, besides getting initial diagnosis of the conception and the argumentative skill by the application of a questionnaire and get new conceptions thru the performance of a focal group after the MTM intervention. As to the obtained results, they were relevant as to the quality of the arguments as well the argumentations, because there was an enhance in quality as the MTM was developed in its phases and, when analyzed the constructions of the students, it was noticed an enhance in the quality of the structure and arguments content and the argumentations once the quality level (AQL) in the nineth class of Fundamental School went from level 1 to level 5, with the intervention of the MTM. In third class of High School, the AQL went from level 2 to level 5. From the MTM, it was also possible to place and identify what is the relation between explanation and narrative with argumentation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800 10.26571/reamec.v8i3.10800 |
url |
https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26571/reamec.v8i3.10800 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/7561 https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8823 https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8824 https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8825 https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8727 https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/reamec/article/view/10800/8822 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 REAMEC - Rede Amazônica de Educação em Ciências e Matemática https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 REAMEC - Rede Amazônica de Educação em Ciências e Matemática https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REAMEC - Red Amazónica de Educación en Ciencias y Matemáticas; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2020): Setembro a dezembro de 2020 ; 342-361 REAMEC - Rede Amazônica de Educação em Ciências e Matemática; v. 8 n. 3 (2020): Setembro a dezembro de 2020 ; 342-361 REAMEC Journal - Amazonian Network of Mathematical Education; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): Setembro a dezembro de 2020 ; 342-361 2318-6674 reponame:Revista Reamec instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) instacron:UFMT |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) |
instacron_str |
UFMT |
institution |
UFMT |
reponame_str |
Revista Reamec |
collection |
Revista Reamec |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Reamec - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistareamec@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1797174816014336000 |