Kant after the end of art

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Xavier, Regina Sanches
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Artefilosofia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/871
Resumo: The general purpose of this article is to analyze the Kantian concept of “mere reflexion” as a critical feeling, in order to think about the problem of contemporary art reception. In order to achieve this aim, firstly we point out the notion of the “end of art” in Arthur Danto and describe how “the world of art” constitutes a problematic legitimation of art. Therefore, we examine the imposing way in which the “world of art” transfigures ordinary objects into pieces of art. Thereafter, we point out the misconceptions that Greenberg made while reading Kant's aesthetic. We argue that Danto's objection to Greenberg, according to which Kantian aesthetics would be obsolete in judging contemporary art, does not correspond to a real objection to the Kantian aesthetic. Finally, we try to answer if the Kantian aesthetic could help us provide a reflection on contemporary art. In this regard, we have made the appropriation of the Kantian concept of reflection along with Thierry de Duve's reading of the Kantian Aesthetics to dialogue with contemporary art.
id UFOP-1_1e92551582f4a0ee7fbb71025b42e9f2
oai_identifier_str oai:pp.www.periodicos.ufop.br:article/871
network_acronym_str UFOP-1
network_name_str Artefilosofia
repository_id_str
spelling Kant after the end of artKant após o fim da arteKantReflectionContemporary artGreenbergDantoKantReflexãoArte contemporâneaDanto.EstéticaThe general purpose of this article is to analyze the Kantian concept of “mere reflexion” as a critical feeling, in order to think about the problem of contemporary art reception. In order to achieve this aim, firstly we point out the notion of the “end of art” in Arthur Danto and describe how “the world of art” constitutes a problematic legitimation of art. Therefore, we examine the imposing way in which the “world of art” transfigures ordinary objects into pieces of art. Thereafter, we point out the misconceptions that Greenberg made while reading Kant's aesthetic. We argue that Danto's objection to Greenberg, according to which Kantian aesthetics would be obsolete in judging contemporary art, does not correspond to a real objection to the Kantian aesthetic. Finally, we try to answer if the Kantian aesthetic could help us provide a reflection on contemporary art. In this regard, we have made the appropriation of the Kantian concept of reflection along with Thierry de Duve's reading of the Kantian Aesthetics to dialogue with contemporary art.O objetivo geral deste artigo é trazer a noção de “mera reflexão”, isto é, a reflexão como um sentimento, a fim de pensar o problema da recepção da arte contemporânea. São curiosas as perguntas que surgem neste período de condenação da arte, quais sejam: é possível definir “o que é arte”? Quais seriam os limites desta definição após o “fim da arte”? E no nosso interesse, até onde a estética kantiana pode nos ajudar a fornecer uma leitura da arte contemporânea? Este artigo busca responder a essas perguntas depois do prognóstico hegeliano do “fim da arte”. Para discutir essas questões, o artigo está estruturado em três partes. Primeiramente percorremos a noção do “fim da arte” em Hegel. Em seguida, discutimos a noção dantiana do “fim da história da arte” e descrevemos como “o mundo da arte” constitui uma legitimação problemática para a arte contemporânea. Assim, examinamos a forma impositiva com a qual o “mundo da arte” transfigura os objetos do cotidiano em obras de arte. Por fim, propomos a apropriação do conceito kantiano de “mera” reflexão para uma noção de legitimação autônoma da arte.  Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto2018-08-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/871Artefilosofia; v. 13 n. 24 (2018); 110-131Artefilosofia; Vol. 13 No. 24 (2018); 110-1312526-78921809-8274reponame:Artefilosofiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPporhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/871/1379Copyright (c) 2018 Artefilosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessXavier, Regina Sanches2021-06-22T13:22:15Zoai:pp.www.periodicos.ufop.br:article/871Revistahttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/oaiartefilosofia.defil@ufop.edu.br || periodicos.sisbin@ufop.edu.br1809-82742526-7892opendoar:2021-06-22T13:22:15Artefilosofia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Kant after the end of art
Kant após o fim da arte
title Kant after the end of art
spellingShingle Kant after the end of art
Xavier, Regina Sanches
Kant
Reflection
Contemporary art
Greenberg
Danto
Kant
Reflexão
Arte contemporânea
Danto.
Estética
title_short Kant after the end of art
title_full Kant after the end of art
title_fullStr Kant after the end of art
title_full_unstemmed Kant after the end of art
title_sort Kant after the end of art
author Xavier, Regina Sanches
author_facet Xavier, Regina Sanches
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Xavier, Regina Sanches
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kant
Reflection
Contemporary art
Greenberg
Danto
Kant
Reflexão
Arte contemporânea
Danto.
Estética
topic Kant
Reflection
Contemporary art
Greenberg
Danto
Kant
Reflexão
Arte contemporânea
Danto.
Estética
description The general purpose of this article is to analyze the Kantian concept of “mere reflexion” as a critical feeling, in order to think about the problem of contemporary art reception. In order to achieve this aim, firstly we point out the notion of the “end of art” in Arthur Danto and describe how “the world of art” constitutes a problematic legitimation of art. Therefore, we examine the imposing way in which the “world of art” transfigures ordinary objects into pieces of art. Thereafter, we point out the misconceptions that Greenberg made while reading Kant's aesthetic. We argue that Danto's objection to Greenberg, according to which Kantian aesthetics would be obsolete in judging contemporary art, does not correspond to a real objection to the Kantian aesthetic. Finally, we try to answer if the Kantian aesthetic could help us provide a reflection on contemporary art. In this regard, we have made the appropriation of the Kantian concept of reflection along with Thierry de Duve's reading of the Kantian Aesthetics to dialogue with contemporary art.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/871
url https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/871
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/871/1379
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Artefilosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Artefilosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Artefilosofia; v. 13 n. 24 (2018); 110-131
Artefilosofia; Vol. 13 No. 24 (2018); 110-131
2526-7892
1809-8274
reponame:Artefilosofia
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str Artefilosofia
collection Artefilosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Artefilosofia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artefilosofia.defil@ufop.edu.br || periodicos.sisbin@ufop.edu.br
_version_ 1798313558462693376