The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a Dystopia
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | História da Historiografia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/2106 |
Resumo: | This article proposes a revision of the idea of the End of History as pictured by Francis Fukuyama regarding its categorization as both a utopia and a dystopia. After revisiting Fukuyama’s original proposal and its amendments by the author in the following years, we use François Hartog’s regimes of historicity as a theoretical tool for understanding the End of History as part of a larger phenomenon. To argue Fukuyama essentially proposes the re-spatialization of utopia, we use Reinhard Koselleck’s “Temporalization of Utopia” and Fredric Jameson’s “End of Temporality” as guidelines. Finally, mobilizing debates on the utopian as a background, we reflect on the political nature of ruptures of temporality to claim that the End of History, though originally a utopian text, has been temporalized as a dystopia following its implementation as a political program. |
id |
UFOP-2_1ef3014c4d6e9592698a3d9ca451d1c5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/2106 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOP-2 |
network_name_str |
História da Historiografia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a DystopiaPresentismUtopiaDystopiaTheory of HistoryEnd of HistoryThis article proposes a revision of the idea of the End of History as pictured by Francis Fukuyama regarding its categorization as both a utopia and a dystopia. After revisiting Fukuyama’s original proposal and its amendments by the author in the following years, we use François Hartog’s regimes of historicity as a theoretical tool for understanding the End of History as part of a larger phenomenon. To argue Fukuyama essentially proposes the re-spatialization of utopia, we use Reinhard Koselleck’s “Temporalization of Utopia” and Fredric Jameson’s “End of Temporality” as guidelines. Finally, mobilizing debates on the utopian as a background, we reflect on the political nature of ruptures of temporality to claim that the End of History, though originally a utopian text, has been temporalized as a dystopia following its implementation as a political program.Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2023-12-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Originalapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/210610.15848/hh.v16i41.2106História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 16 No. 41 (2023); 1-23História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 16 Núm. 41 (2023); 1-23História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 16 n. 41 (2023); 1-231983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPenghttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/2106/1047Copyright (c) 2023 Antenor Savoldi Jr.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSavoldi Jr, Antenor2023-12-25T16:21:09Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/2106Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2023-12-25T16:21:09História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a Dystopia |
title |
The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a Dystopia |
spellingShingle |
The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a Dystopia Savoldi Jr, Antenor Presentism Utopia Dystopia Theory of History End of History |
title_short |
The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a Dystopia |
title_full |
The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a Dystopia |
title_fullStr |
The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a Dystopia |
title_full_unstemmed |
The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a Dystopia |
title_sort |
The End of History: Re-Spatialization of a Utopia and Temporalization of a Dystopia |
author |
Savoldi Jr, Antenor |
author_facet |
Savoldi Jr, Antenor |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Savoldi Jr, Antenor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Presentism Utopia Dystopia Theory of History End of History |
topic |
Presentism Utopia Dystopia Theory of History End of History |
description |
This article proposes a revision of the idea of the End of History as pictured by Francis Fukuyama regarding its categorization as both a utopia and a dystopia. After revisiting Fukuyama’s original proposal and its amendments by the author in the following years, we use François Hartog’s regimes of historicity as a theoretical tool for understanding the End of History as part of a larger phenomenon. To argue Fukuyama essentially proposes the re-spatialization of utopia, we use Reinhard Koselleck’s “Temporalization of Utopia” and Fredric Jameson’s “End of Temporality” as guidelines. Finally, mobilizing debates on the utopian as a background, we reflect on the political nature of ruptures of temporality to claim that the End of History, though originally a utopian text, has been temporalized as a dystopia following its implementation as a political program. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Original |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/2106 10.15848/hh.v16i41.2106 |
url |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/2106 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15848/hh.v16i41.2106 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/2106/1047 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Antenor Savoldi Jr. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Antenor Savoldi Jr. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 16 No. 41 (2023); 1-23 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 16 Núm. 41 (2023); 1-23 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 16 n. 41 (2023); 1-23 1983-9928 reponame:História da Historiografia instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
instacron_str |
UFOP |
institution |
UFOP |
reponame_str |
História da Historiografia |
collection |
História da Historiografia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1797220360879341568 |