Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramalho, Walderez
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: História da Historiografia
Texto Completo: https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733
Resumo: In this article, I argue that the concept of crisis entails a particular form of experiencing and thinking historical time that can only be properly grasped by considering the asymmetry between chronos and kairos. After exploring the main meanings of these two Greek terms for “time”, I show that the chronos paradigm holds hegemony in contemporary theorizations on historical time. Reinhart Koselleck, who construed an influential conceptual history of “crisis”, reiterated such hegemony in his interpretation of the concept’s temporal sense by associating it with the phenomenon of temporal acceleration. This article argues that Koselleck’s interpretation is insufficient since “crisis” encompasses certain dimensions of temporal experience that can only be understood through the notion of kairos – namely, the temporality of decision, urgency, imminent rupture, and uncertainty about the future.
id UFOP-2_3bc75c40ac25957861a7ab42a477fcf8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1733
network_acronym_str UFOP-2
network_name_str História da Historiografia
repository_id_str
spelling Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairosTheory of HistoryHistorical TimeHistory of ConceptsIn this article, I argue that the concept of crisis entails a particular form of experiencing and thinking historical time that can only be properly grasped by considering the asymmetry between chronos and kairos. After exploring the main meanings of these two Greek terms for “time”, I show that the chronos paradigm holds hegemony in contemporary theorizations on historical time. Reinhart Koselleck, who construed an influential conceptual history of “crisis”, reiterated such hegemony in his interpretation of the concept’s temporal sense by associating it with the phenomenon of temporal acceleration. This article argues that Koselleck’s interpretation is insufficient since “crisis” encompasses certain dimensions of temporal experience that can only be understood through the notion of kairos – namely, the temporality of decision, urgency, imminent rupture, and uncertainty about the future.Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/173310.15848/hh.v14i35.1733História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 35 (2021); 115-144História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 35 (2021); 115-144História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 35 (2021); 115-1441983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPenghttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733/933Copyright (c) 2021 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiographyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamalho, Walderez2021-08-31T21:24:53Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1733Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2021-08-31T21:24:53História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos
title Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos
spellingShingle Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos
Ramalho, Walderez
Theory of History
Historical Time
History of Concepts
title_short Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos
title_full Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos
title_fullStr Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos
title_full_unstemmed Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos
title_sort Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos
author Ramalho, Walderez
author_facet Ramalho, Walderez
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramalho, Walderez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Theory of History
Historical Time
History of Concepts
topic Theory of History
Historical Time
History of Concepts
description In this article, I argue that the concept of crisis entails a particular form of experiencing and thinking historical time that can only be properly grasped by considering the asymmetry between chronos and kairos. After exploring the main meanings of these two Greek terms for “time”, I show that the chronos paradigm holds hegemony in contemporary theorizations on historical time. Reinhart Koselleck, who construed an influential conceptual history of “crisis”, reiterated such hegemony in his interpretation of the concept’s temporal sense by associating it with the phenomenon of temporal acceleration. This article argues that Koselleck’s interpretation is insufficient since “crisis” encompasses certain dimensions of temporal experience that can only be understood through the notion of kairos – namely, the temporality of decision, urgency, imminent rupture, and uncertainty about the future.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733
10.15848/hh.v14i35.1733
url https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733
identifier_str_mv 10.15848/hh.v14i35.1733
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733/933
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 35 (2021); 115-144
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 35 (2021); 115-144
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 35 (2021); 115-144
1983-9928
reponame:História da Historiografia
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str História da Historiografia
collection História da Historiografia
repository.name.fl_str_mv História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com
_version_ 1797220360458862592