Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | História da Historiografia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733 |
Resumo: | In this article, I argue that the concept of crisis entails a particular form of experiencing and thinking historical time that can only be properly grasped by considering the asymmetry between chronos and kairos. After exploring the main meanings of these two Greek terms for “time”, I show that the chronos paradigm holds hegemony in contemporary theorizations on historical time. Reinhart Koselleck, who construed an influential conceptual history of “crisis”, reiterated such hegemony in his interpretation of the concept’s temporal sense by associating it with the phenomenon of temporal acceleration. This article argues that Koselleck’s interpretation is insufficient since “crisis” encompasses certain dimensions of temporal experience that can only be understood through the notion of kairos – namely, the temporality of decision, urgency, imminent rupture, and uncertainty about the future. |
id |
UFOP-2_3bc75c40ac25957861a7ab42a477fcf8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1733 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOP-2 |
network_name_str |
História da Historiografia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairosTheory of HistoryHistorical TimeHistory of ConceptsIn this article, I argue that the concept of crisis entails a particular form of experiencing and thinking historical time that can only be properly grasped by considering the asymmetry between chronos and kairos. After exploring the main meanings of these two Greek terms for “time”, I show that the chronos paradigm holds hegemony in contemporary theorizations on historical time. Reinhart Koselleck, who construed an influential conceptual history of “crisis”, reiterated such hegemony in his interpretation of the concept’s temporal sense by associating it with the phenomenon of temporal acceleration. This article argues that Koselleck’s interpretation is insufficient since “crisis” encompasses certain dimensions of temporal experience that can only be understood through the notion of kairos – namely, the temporality of decision, urgency, imminent rupture, and uncertainty about the future.Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/173310.15848/hh.v14i35.1733História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 35 (2021); 115-144História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 35 (2021); 115-144História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 35 (2021); 115-1441983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPenghttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733/933Copyright (c) 2021 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiographyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamalho, Walderez2021-08-31T21:24:53Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1733Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2021-08-31T21:24:53História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos |
title |
Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos |
spellingShingle |
Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos Ramalho, Walderez Theory of History Historical Time History of Concepts |
title_short |
Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos |
title_full |
Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos |
title_fullStr |
Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos |
title_sort |
Reinterpreting the “times of crisis” based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos |
author |
Ramalho, Walderez |
author_facet |
Ramalho, Walderez |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramalho, Walderez |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Theory of History Historical Time History of Concepts |
topic |
Theory of History Historical Time History of Concepts |
description |
In this article, I argue that the concept of crisis entails a particular form of experiencing and thinking historical time that can only be properly grasped by considering the asymmetry between chronos and kairos. After exploring the main meanings of these two Greek terms for “time”, I show that the chronos paradigm holds hegemony in contemporary theorizations on historical time. Reinhart Koselleck, who construed an influential conceptual history of “crisis”, reiterated such hegemony in his interpretation of the concept’s temporal sense by associating it with the phenomenon of temporal acceleration. This article argues that Koselleck’s interpretation is insufficient since “crisis” encompasses certain dimensions of temporal experience that can only be understood through the notion of kairos – namely, the temporality of decision, urgency, imminent rupture, and uncertainty about the future. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733 10.15848/hh.v14i35.1733 |
url |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15848/hh.v14i35.1733 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1733/933 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 35 (2021); 115-144 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 35 (2021); 115-144 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 35 (2021); 115-144 1983-9928 reponame:História da Historiografia instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
instacron_str |
UFOP |
institution |
UFOP |
reponame_str |
História da Historiografia |
collection |
História da Historiografia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1797220360458862592 |