[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | História da Historiografia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1669 |
Resumo: | This article advocates for a set of recent transdisciplinary options for the History of Religion, combining methods from the Natural and Human Sciences, through a special focus on the study of so-called “complex systems”. We elucidate their theoretical bases and limitations while assuming a pragmatic positioning between a defense of the historical-scientific study of religion and the promotion of groundbreaking methodological outlooks emerging from the Digital Humanities. From this background, throughout the text, we argue for a complementation of historiographical “close reading” with both “distant reading” techniques and interdisciplinary research, using computer-based methods and a diversity of formal modeling techniques. In short, we conclude that such methods offer novel ways for data representation and are best understood not only as creative schemes for solving issues in historiography, but also as a springboard for new inquiries arising from the transdisciplinarity between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences. |
id |
UFOP-2_42cf7f007b12c73daf691dce74743460 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1669 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOP-2 |
network_name_str |
História da Historiografia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural SciencesInterdisciplinarityMethodologyDigital HumanitiesInterdisciplinaridadeMetodologiaHumanidades DigitaisThis article advocates for a set of recent transdisciplinary options for the History of Religion, combining methods from the Natural and Human Sciences, through a special focus on the study of so-called “complex systems”. We elucidate their theoretical bases and limitations while assuming a pragmatic positioning between a defense of the historical-scientific study of religion and the promotion of groundbreaking methodological outlooks emerging from the Digital Humanities. From this background, throughout the text, we argue for a complementation of historiographical “close reading” with both “distant reading” techniques and interdisciplinary research, using computer-based methods and a diversity of formal modeling techniques. In short, we conclude that such methods offer novel ways for data representation and are best understood not only as creative schemes for solving issues in historiography, but also as a springboard for new inquiries arising from the transdisciplinarity between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences.Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos pares, dossiêapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/166910.15848/hh.v14i36.1669História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 36 (2021); 167-196História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 36 (2021); 167-196História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 36 (2021); 167-1961983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPenghttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1669/946Copyright (c) 2021 Thales Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Thales2021-12-09T15:23:35Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1669Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2021-12-09T15:23:35História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences |
title |
[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences |
spellingShingle |
[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences Silva, Thales Interdisciplinarity Methodology Digital Humanities Interdisciplinaridade Metodologia Humanidades Digitais |
title_short |
[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences |
title_full |
[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences |
title_fullStr |
[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences |
title_full_unstemmed |
[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences |
title_sort |
[RETRACTED ARTICLE] Complexity theory and the historical study of religion: navigating the transdisciplinary space between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences |
author |
Silva, Thales |
author_facet |
Silva, Thales |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Thales |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Interdisciplinarity Methodology Digital Humanities Interdisciplinaridade Metodologia Humanidades Digitais |
topic |
Interdisciplinarity Methodology Digital Humanities Interdisciplinaridade Metodologia Humanidades Digitais |
description |
This article advocates for a set of recent transdisciplinary options for the History of Religion, combining methods from the Natural and Human Sciences, through a special focus on the study of so-called “complex systems”. We elucidate their theoretical bases and limitations while assuming a pragmatic positioning between a defense of the historical-scientific study of religion and the promotion of groundbreaking methodological outlooks emerging from the Digital Humanities. From this background, throughout the text, we argue for a complementation of historiographical “close reading” with both “distant reading” techniques and interdisciplinary research, using computer-based methods and a diversity of formal modeling techniques. In short, we conclude that such methods offer novel ways for data representation and are best understood not only as creative schemes for solving issues in historiography, but also as a springboard for new inquiries arising from the transdisciplinarity between the Humanities and the Natural Sciences. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares, dossiê |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1669 10.15848/hh.v14i36.1669 |
url |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1669 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15848/hh.v14i36.1669 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1669/946 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Thales Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Thales Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 36 (2021); 167-196 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 36 (2021); 167-196 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 36 (2021); 167-196 1983-9928 reponame:História da Historiografia instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
instacron_str |
UFOP |
institution |
UFOP |
reponame_str |
História da Historiografia |
collection |
História da Historiografia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1797220360349810688 |