Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFOP |
Texto Completo: | http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17696 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm2020023 |
Resumo: | An accurate and rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 is an effective strategy for pandemic control, allowing disease screening and timely therapeutic intervention. We analyzed scientific reports about rapid tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 to assess their reliability parameters. Medical Subject Headings terms or keywords related to point-of-care and rapid diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 were searched in data published from November 2020 to November 2021 in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Notable differences were observed in sensitivity among direct tests that used different samples, and good accuracy was reported in a significant number of studies (>80%). Pediatric samples and samples with high Ct values (RT-PCR) had suboptimal sensitivity (range 45.4% to 66%). Further, a lack of sensitivity (<46.2%) was observed in point-of-care tests and in rapid diagnostic tests for antibody detection in the first days after infection, with increasing values in postinfection analysis (>60%). For serological detection of IgM or Antigen rapid diagnostic tests, no cross-reactivity was found with other coronaviruses. Therefore, although these tests are very important in facing the pandemic, they still need to be improved to test cross-reactivity against other pathogens, especially against other coronaviruses. |
id |
UFOP_2ef539e1e756838ec17a484dbfc0a98a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/17696 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFOP |
repository_id_str |
3233 |
spelling |
Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.SARS-CoV-2Point-of-careRapid diagnostic testsAn accurate and rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 is an effective strategy for pandemic control, allowing disease screening and timely therapeutic intervention. We analyzed scientific reports about rapid tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 to assess their reliability parameters. Medical Subject Headings terms or keywords related to point-of-care and rapid diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 were searched in data published from November 2020 to November 2021 in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Notable differences were observed in sensitivity among direct tests that used different samples, and good accuracy was reported in a significant number of studies (>80%). Pediatric samples and samples with high Ct values (RT-PCR) had suboptimal sensitivity (range 45.4% to 66%). Further, a lack of sensitivity (<46.2%) was observed in point-of-care tests and in rapid diagnostic tests for antibody detection in the first days after infection, with increasing values in postinfection analysis (>60%). For serological detection of IgM or Antigen rapid diagnostic tests, no cross-reactivity was found with other coronaviruses. Therefore, although these tests are very important in facing the pandemic, they still need to be improved to test cross-reactivity against other pathogens, especially against other coronaviruses.2023-10-31T19:56:34Z2023-10-31T19:56:34Z2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfDIAS, B. de P. et al. Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. International Journal of Translational Medicine, v. 2, n. 2, p. 252-274, 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8937/2/2/23>. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2023.2673-8937http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17696https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm2020023This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). Fonte: PDF do artigo.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Bruna de PaulaGonçalves, Ricardo LemesFerreira, Cyntia SilvaBarbosa, Camila CavadasPineda Arrieta, Orlando AlfredoSantos, Samara Mayra Soares Alves dosMalta, Wellington CarvalhoSilva, Mariela Alves eGomes, Maria Laura Maximiano DiasGuimarães, Adriana GibaraBorges, Lysandro PintoSilva, Breno de Melloengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOPinstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOP2024-11-11T03:12:58Zoai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/17696Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/oai/requestrepositorio@ufop.edu.bropendoar:32332024-11-11T03:12:58Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. |
title |
Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. |
spellingShingle |
Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. Dias, Bruna de Paula SARS-CoV-2 Point-of-care Rapid diagnostic tests |
title_short |
Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. |
title_full |
Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. |
title_fullStr |
Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. |
title_sort |
Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. |
author |
Dias, Bruna de Paula |
author_facet |
Dias, Bruna de Paula Gonçalves, Ricardo Lemes Ferreira, Cyntia Silva Barbosa, Camila Cavadas Pineda Arrieta, Orlando Alfredo Santos, Samara Mayra Soares Alves dos Malta, Wellington Carvalho Silva, Mariela Alves e Gomes, Maria Laura Maximiano Dias Guimarães, Adriana Gibara Borges, Lysandro Pinto Silva, Breno de Mello |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gonçalves, Ricardo Lemes Ferreira, Cyntia Silva Barbosa, Camila Cavadas Pineda Arrieta, Orlando Alfredo Santos, Samara Mayra Soares Alves dos Malta, Wellington Carvalho Silva, Mariela Alves e Gomes, Maria Laura Maximiano Dias Guimarães, Adriana Gibara Borges, Lysandro Pinto Silva, Breno de Mello |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dias, Bruna de Paula Gonçalves, Ricardo Lemes Ferreira, Cyntia Silva Barbosa, Camila Cavadas Pineda Arrieta, Orlando Alfredo Santos, Samara Mayra Soares Alves dos Malta, Wellington Carvalho Silva, Mariela Alves e Gomes, Maria Laura Maximiano Dias Guimarães, Adriana Gibara Borges, Lysandro Pinto Silva, Breno de Mello |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
SARS-CoV-2 Point-of-care Rapid diagnostic tests |
topic |
SARS-CoV-2 Point-of-care Rapid diagnostic tests |
description |
An accurate and rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 is an effective strategy for pandemic control, allowing disease screening and timely therapeutic intervention. We analyzed scientific reports about rapid tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 to assess their reliability parameters. Medical Subject Headings terms or keywords related to point-of-care and rapid diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 were searched in data published from November 2020 to November 2021 in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Notable differences were observed in sensitivity among direct tests that used different samples, and good accuracy was reported in a significant number of studies (>80%). Pediatric samples and samples with high Ct values (RT-PCR) had suboptimal sensitivity (range 45.4% to 66%). Further, a lack of sensitivity (<46.2%) was observed in point-of-care tests and in rapid diagnostic tests for antibody detection in the first days after infection, with increasing values in postinfection analysis (>60%). For serological detection of IgM or Antigen rapid diagnostic tests, no cross-reactivity was found with other coronaviruses. Therefore, although these tests are very important in facing the pandemic, they still need to be improved to test cross-reactivity against other pathogens, especially against other coronaviruses. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 2023-10-31T19:56:34Z 2023-10-31T19:56:34Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
DIAS, B. de P. et al. Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. International Journal of Translational Medicine, v. 2, n. 2, p. 252-274, 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8937/2/2/23>. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2023. 2673-8937 http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17696 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm2020023 |
identifier_str_mv |
DIAS, B. de P. et al. Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. International Journal of Translational Medicine, v. 2, n. 2, p. 252-274, 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8937/2/2/23>. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2023. 2673-8937 |
url |
http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17696 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm2020023 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOP instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
instacron_str |
UFOP |
institution |
UFOP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFOP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFOP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ufop.edu.br |
_version_ |
1823329462422339584 |