Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Bruna de Paula
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Gonçalves, Ricardo Lemes, Ferreira, Cyntia Silva, Barbosa, Camila Cavadas, Pineda Arrieta, Orlando Alfredo, Santos, Samara Mayra Soares Alves dos, Malta, Wellington Carvalho, Silva, Mariela Alves e, Gomes, Maria Laura Maximiano Dias, Guimarães, Adriana Gibara, Borges, Lysandro Pinto, Silva, Breno de Mello
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFOP
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17696
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm2020023
Resumo: An accurate and rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 is an effective strategy for pandemic control, allowing disease screening and timely therapeutic intervention. We analyzed scientific reports about rapid tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 to assess their reliability parameters. Medical Subject Headings terms or keywords related to point-of-care and rapid diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 were searched in data published from November 2020 to November 2021 in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Notable differences were observed in sensitivity among direct tests that used different samples, and good accuracy was reported in a significant number of studies (>80%). Pediatric samples and samples with high Ct values (RT-PCR) had suboptimal sensitivity (range 45.4% to 66%). Further, a lack of sensitivity (<46.2%) was observed in point-of-care tests and in rapid diagnostic tests for antibody detection in the first days after infection, with increasing values in postinfection analysis (>60%). For serological detection of IgM or Antigen rapid diagnostic tests, no cross-reactivity was found with other coronaviruses. Therefore, although these tests are very important in facing the pandemic, they still need to be improved to test cross-reactivity against other pathogens, especially against other coronaviruses.
id UFOP_2ef539e1e756838ec17a484dbfc0a98a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/17696
network_acronym_str UFOP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
repository_id_str 3233
spelling Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.SARS-CoV-2Point-of-careRapid diagnostic testsAn accurate and rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 is an effective strategy for pandemic control, allowing disease screening and timely therapeutic intervention. We analyzed scientific reports about rapid tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 to assess their reliability parameters. Medical Subject Headings terms or keywords related to point-of-care and rapid diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 were searched in data published from November 2020 to November 2021 in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Notable differences were observed in sensitivity among direct tests that used different samples, and good accuracy was reported in a significant number of studies (>80%). Pediatric samples and samples with high Ct values (RT-PCR) had suboptimal sensitivity (range 45.4% to 66%). Further, a lack of sensitivity (<46.2%) was observed in point-of-care tests and in rapid diagnostic tests for antibody detection in the first days after infection, with increasing values in postinfection analysis (>60%). For serological detection of IgM or Antigen rapid diagnostic tests, no cross-reactivity was found with other coronaviruses. Therefore, although these tests are very important in facing the pandemic, they still need to be improved to test cross-reactivity against other pathogens, especially against other coronaviruses.2023-10-31T19:56:34Z2023-10-31T19:56:34Z2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfDIAS, B. de P. et al. Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. International Journal of Translational Medicine, v. 2, n. 2, p. 252-274, 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8937/2/2/23>. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2023.2673-8937http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17696https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm2020023This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). Fonte: PDF do artigo.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Bruna de PaulaGonçalves, Ricardo LemesFerreira, Cyntia SilvaBarbosa, Camila CavadasPineda Arrieta, Orlando AlfredoSantos, Samara Mayra Soares Alves dosMalta, Wellington CarvalhoSilva, Mariela Alves eGomes, Maria Laura Maximiano DiasGuimarães, Adriana GibaraBorges, Lysandro PintoSilva, Breno de Melloengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOPinstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOP2024-11-11T03:12:58Zoai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/17696Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/oai/requestrepositorio@ufop.edu.bropendoar:32332024-11-11T03:12:58Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.
title Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.
spellingShingle Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.
Dias, Bruna de Paula
SARS-CoV-2
Point-of-care
Rapid diagnostic tests
title_short Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.
title_full Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.
title_fullStr Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.
title_sort Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review.
author Dias, Bruna de Paula
author_facet Dias, Bruna de Paula
Gonçalves, Ricardo Lemes
Ferreira, Cyntia Silva
Barbosa, Camila Cavadas
Pineda Arrieta, Orlando Alfredo
Santos, Samara Mayra Soares Alves dos
Malta, Wellington Carvalho
Silva, Mariela Alves e
Gomes, Maria Laura Maximiano Dias
Guimarães, Adriana Gibara
Borges, Lysandro Pinto
Silva, Breno de Mello
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, Ricardo Lemes
Ferreira, Cyntia Silva
Barbosa, Camila Cavadas
Pineda Arrieta, Orlando Alfredo
Santos, Samara Mayra Soares Alves dos
Malta, Wellington Carvalho
Silva, Mariela Alves e
Gomes, Maria Laura Maximiano Dias
Guimarães, Adriana Gibara
Borges, Lysandro Pinto
Silva, Breno de Mello
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Bruna de Paula
Gonçalves, Ricardo Lemes
Ferreira, Cyntia Silva
Barbosa, Camila Cavadas
Pineda Arrieta, Orlando Alfredo
Santos, Samara Mayra Soares Alves dos
Malta, Wellington Carvalho
Silva, Mariela Alves e
Gomes, Maria Laura Maximiano Dias
Guimarães, Adriana Gibara
Borges, Lysandro Pinto
Silva, Breno de Mello
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv SARS-CoV-2
Point-of-care
Rapid diagnostic tests
topic SARS-CoV-2
Point-of-care
Rapid diagnostic tests
description An accurate and rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 is an effective strategy for pandemic control, allowing disease screening and timely therapeutic intervention. We analyzed scientific reports about rapid tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 to assess their reliability parameters. Medical Subject Headings terms or keywords related to point-of-care and rapid diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 were searched in data published from November 2020 to November 2021 in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Notable differences were observed in sensitivity among direct tests that used different samples, and good accuracy was reported in a significant number of studies (>80%). Pediatric samples and samples with high Ct values (RT-PCR) had suboptimal sensitivity (range 45.4% to 66%). Further, a lack of sensitivity (<46.2%) was observed in point-of-care tests and in rapid diagnostic tests for antibody detection in the first days after infection, with increasing values in postinfection analysis (>60%). For serological detection of IgM or Antigen rapid diagnostic tests, no cross-reactivity was found with other coronaviruses. Therefore, although these tests are very important in facing the pandemic, they still need to be improved to test cross-reactivity against other pathogens, especially against other coronaviruses.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2023-10-31T19:56:34Z
2023-10-31T19:56:34Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv DIAS, B. de P. et al. Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. International Journal of Translational Medicine, v. 2, n. 2, p. 252-274, 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8937/2/2/23>. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2023.
2673-8937
http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17696
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm2020023
identifier_str_mv DIAS, B. de P. et al. Update on rapid diagnostics for covid-19 : a systematic review. International Journal of Translational Medicine, v. 2, n. 2, p. 252-274, 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8937/2/2/23>. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2023.
2673-8937
url http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17696
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm2020023
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOP
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
collection Repositório Institucional da UFOP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufop.edu.br
_version_ 1823329462422339584