Further genetic characterization of the two Trypanosoma cruzi Berenice strains (Be-62 and Be-78) isolated from the first human case of Chagas disease (Chagas, 1909).

• Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Ruth Elizabeth
• Data de Publicação: 2006
• Outros Autores: Macedo, Andréa Mara, Barnabé, Christian, Freitas, Jorge Marcelo de, Chiari, Egler, Veloso, Vanja Maria, Carneiro, Cláudia Martins, Bahia, Maria Terezinha, Tafuri, Washington Luiz, Lana, Marta de
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFOP
• Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/1410
• topic: Isoenzyme; Microssatellites; Trypanosoma cruzi; Berenice strains

We describe here an extension of a previous genetic characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi strains (Be-62 and Be-78) isolated from the patient Berenice, the first human case of Chagas disease [Chagas, C., 1909. Nova Tripanom´ıase humana. Estudos sobre morfologia e o ciclo evolutivo do Schizotrypanum cruzi, n. gen., n. sp., agente etiol´ojico da nova entidade morbida do homem. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1, 159–218]. We wanted to verify the composition of T. cruzi populations originated from these two isolates. In the present work, 22 enzymatic loci (MLEE), nine RAPD primers and 7 microsatellite loci were analyzed. Clones from both strains were also characterized to verify whether these strains are mono or polyclonal. Be-62 and Be-78 strains were different in 3 out of 22 enzymatic systems, in 3 out of 9 RAPD primers tested and in all microsatellite loci investigated. However, our data suggests that both strains are phylogenetically closely related, belonging to genetic group 32 from Tibayrenc and Ayala [Tibayrenc, M., Ayala, F.J., 1988. Isoenzime variability in Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas’ disease: genetical, taxonomical, and epidemiological significance. Evolution 42, 277–292], equivalent to zymodeme 2 and T. cruzi II major lineage which, in Brazil, comprises parasites from the domestic cycle of the disease. Microsatellite analyses showed differences betweenthe parental strains but suggested that both populations are monoclonal since each strain and their respective clones showed the same amplification products.