Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leventhal, Lucila Coca
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Barbosa, Kristiane Santos Ferreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
Texto Completo: https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571
Resumo: Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods.
id UFOR-2_e41b9e7c9aaf7e4c1fba703bcb44c112
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/571
network_acronym_str UFOR-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository_id_str
spelling Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269Planejamento da gestação entre puérperas de hospital público e privado - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269Planejamento FamiliarAnticoncepçãoSaúde da Mulher.Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods.Objetivo: Comparar as puérperas de um hospital público (Hpu) e as de um hospital privado (Hpr) no planejamento de sua gravidez e identificar os métodos contraceptivos que ocasionam falhas em seu uso, para melhor direcionar o atendimento na contracepção. Métodos: Estudo descritivo, realizado em dois hospitais do município de São Paulo, um público e outro privado. A coleta de dados ocorreu no mês de agosto de 2004 nos dois hospitais, através de um questionário, onde todas as puérperas de cada hospital foram entrevistadas. Realizou-se a análise estatística por meio de números absolutos e percentagens. Resultados: Participaram desta pesquisa 171 puérperas (83 do Hpu e 88 do Hpr). A maioria das puérperas do Hpu 69,9% (58) não planejou a gravidez, enquanto 83,0% (73) do Hpr planejaram. Os métodos contraceptivos que mais ocasionaram falhas foram pílula 27,6% (16) e preservativo masculino 12,1% (7) no Hpu, e, método da tabela 26,6% (4) e pílula, 13,3% (2) no Hpr. Conclusões: O planejamento da gravidez foi realizado pela maioria das puérperas do Hpr, não ocorrendo o mesmo para as puérperas do Hpu. A pílula anticoncepcional e o preservativo masculino, e, o método da tabela e a pílula representaram os métodos contraceptivos que mais falharam, no Hpu e Hpr, respectivamente. Faz-se necessária a realização e divulgação de programas de planejamento familiar para as pessoas menos favorecidas e proporcionar acesso aos métodos contraceptivos.Universidade de Fortaleza2012-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed Article""Avaliado pelos pares""Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/57110.5020/571Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2008); 269-274Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 21 Núm. 4 (2008); 269-274Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 21 n. 4 (2008); 269-2741806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571/2236Leventhal, Lucila CocaBarbosa, Kristiane Santos Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-01-10T12:19:27Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/571Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2012-01-10T12:19:27Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
Planejamento da gestação entre puérperas de hospital público e privado - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
spellingShingle Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
Leventhal, Lucila Coca
Planejamento Familiar
Anticoncepção
Saúde da Mulher.
title_short Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title_full Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title_fullStr Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
title_sort Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
author Leventhal, Lucila Coca
author_facet Leventhal, Lucila Coca
Barbosa, Kristiane Santos Ferreira
author_role author
author2 Barbosa, Kristiane Santos Ferreira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leventhal, Lucila Coca
Barbosa, Kristiane Santos Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Planejamento Familiar
Anticoncepção
Saúde da Mulher.
topic Planejamento Familiar
Anticoncepção
Saúde da Mulher.
description Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed Article"
"Avaliado pelos pares"
"Avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571
10.5020/571
url https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571
identifier_str_mv 10.5020/571
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571/2236
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2008); 269-274
Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 21 Núm. 4 (2008); 269-274
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 21 n. 4 (2008); 269-274
1806-1230
reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron:UFOR
instname_str Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron_str UFOR
institution UFOR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
collection Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808844172330795008