Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods. |
id |
UFOR-2_e41b9e7c9aaf7e4c1fba703bcb44c112 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/571 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOR-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269Planejamento da gestação entre puérperas de hospital público e privado - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269Planejamento FamiliarAnticoncepçãoSaúde da Mulher.Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods.Objetivo: Comparar as puérperas de um hospital público (Hpu) e as de um hospital privado (Hpr) no planejamento de sua gravidez e identificar os métodos contraceptivos que ocasionam falhas em seu uso, para melhor direcionar o atendimento na contracepção. Métodos: Estudo descritivo, realizado em dois hospitais do município de São Paulo, um público e outro privado. A coleta de dados ocorreu no mês de agosto de 2004 nos dois hospitais, através de um questionário, onde todas as puérperas de cada hospital foram entrevistadas. Realizou-se a análise estatística por meio de números absolutos e percentagens. Resultados: Participaram desta pesquisa 171 puérperas (83 do Hpu e 88 do Hpr). A maioria das puérperas do Hpu 69,9% (58) não planejou a gravidez, enquanto 83,0% (73) do Hpr planejaram. Os métodos contraceptivos que mais ocasionaram falhas foram pílula 27,6% (16) e preservativo masculino 12,1% (7) no Hpu, e, método da tabela 26,6% (4) e pílula, 13,3% (2) no Hpr. Conclusões: O planejamento da gravidez foi realizado pela maioria das puérperas do Hpr, não ocorrendo o mesmo para as puérperas do Hpu. A pílula anticoncepcional e o preservativo masculino, e, o método da tabela e a pílula representaram os métodos contraceptivos que mais falharam, no Hpu e Hpr, respectivamente. Faz-se necessária a realização e divulgação de programas de planejamento familiar para as pessoas menos favorecidas e proporcionar acesso aos métodos contraceptivos.Universidade de Fortaleza2012-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed Article""Avaliado pelos pares""Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/57110.5020/571Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2008); 269-274Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 21 Núm. 4 (2008); 269-274Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 21 n. 4 (2008); 269-2741806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571/2236Leventhal, Lucila CocaBarbosa, Kristiane Santos Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-01-10T12:19:27Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/571Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2012-01-10T12:19:27Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 Planejamento da gestação entre puérperas de hospital público e privado - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title |
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
spellingShingle |
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 Leventhal, Lucila Coca Planejamento Familiar Anticoncepção Saúde da Mulher. |
title_short |
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title_full |
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title_fullStr |
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
title_sort |
Pregnancy planning among women at postpartum period in a public and a private hospital - doi:10.5020/18061230.2008.p269 |
author |
Leventhal, Lucila Coca |
author_facet |
Leventhal, Lucila Coca Barbosa, Kristiane Santos Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbosa, Kristiane Santos Ferreira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leventhal, Lucila Coca Barbosa, Kristiane Santos Ferreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Planejamento Familiar Anticoncepção Saúde da Mulher. |
topic |
Planejamento Familiar Anticoncepção Saúde da Mulher. |
description |
Purpose: To compare the attitudes of women at postpartum period, from a public (PuH) and a private hospital (PrH), regarding their pregnancy planning and to identify contraceptive methods that failed on use, in order to better direct the assistance at contraception. Methods: It was a descriptive study, held on two hospitals from the city of São Paulo. The data collection occurred in August, 2004, by means of a questionnaire applied to all women at postpartum period of each hospital (83 from PuH and 88 from PrU), comprising 171 interviewed. Statistical analysis was done by absolute frequencies and percentages. Results: Most of the interviewed women from PuH (69.9%; n=58) did not plan their pregnancy, while 83.0% (n=73) of those from PrH did so. The contraceptive methods that mostly caused failure were the pill (27.6%; n=16) and the condom (12.1%; n=7) at PuH; and the Ogino- Knaus method [rhythm method of contraception] (26.6%; n=4) and the pill (13.3%; n=2) at PrH. Conclusions: Pregnancy planning was done by most of the women from PrH; the same not occurring for women from PuH. The contraceptive pill and the condom, at PuH, and the rhythm method and the pill, at PrH, were the contraceptive methods that mostly failed. The accomplishment and disclosure of family planning programs for more deprived people is needed, as well as to favor them easy access to contraceptive methods. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed Article" "Avaliado pelos pares" "Avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571 10.5020/571 |
url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/571 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/571/2236 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2008); 269-274 Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 21 Núm. 4 (2008); 269-274 Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 21 n. 4 (2008); 269-274 1806-1230 reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) instacron:UFOR |
instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
instacron_str |
UFOR |
institution |
UFOR |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
collection |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808844172330795008 |