Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21036 |
Resumo: | We defend the thesis that the Teacher's Manual (TM) in Brazilian Portuguese textbooks, often understood as a mechanism of language policies, has been collaborating since the 1970's, with the imaginary construction of the linguistic homogeneity/standardizing (ORLANDI, 2013; SHOHAMY, 2006) of Brazilian Portuguese, as in the case of pronominal syntax, spreading ideologies which are explicit or implicit (SPOLSKY, 2004; SHOHAMY, 2006) about Portuguese language and its varieties. So, we start from the following questions: which linguistic ideologies are present in TM of Portuguese textbooks? How do the TMs treat pronominal syntax in general and its specific occurrences of Brazilian Portuguese (BP) studied by specialists in specific, and what is the relation of this approach with the ideology of standardization in the language? Our objectives were: general - to unveil the TM as a mechanism of linguistic politics in the process of standardization of the Portuguese language according to the approach made on the pronominal syntax; and specifics - to investigate the linguistic ideologies of the authors in the way they approach Portuguese language and its teaching in the Teacher's Manual and its implications in the process of standardization of the language. It were also necessary concepts such as use, rule, system, standard language, language variety, linguistic purism, standardization and language teaching, discussed by authors like Coseriu (1980), Galves, (1998) Spolsky (2004), Shohamy (2006), Leite (s/d; 2006), Bagno (2004, 2009, 2012, 2019), Mattos e Silva (2000, 2012), Faraco (2016), Faraco e Zilles (2017), Vieira (2018). Our research is documental and the text corpus is constituted of 12 (twelve) TMs from different textbooks, being 6 from 7th grade and 6 from 8th grade of middle school, published between 1970 and 2012. We work with two hypothesis, the first one defended that in the Teacher's Manuals released before the PCN the ideologies related to the necessity of standardization were more explicit, since there was still no explanation in the official documents of the linguistic theories that appeared in the Manuals afterwards, which leads, in the didactic material, to practices with implicit ideologies of standardization. Such hypothesis was confirmed, as the first Manuals showed the language as an expression of thoughts and also used terms like "right/wrong" in a constant way, on the other hand, the evaluation in the most recent ones was done by the selection of contents and in the way to approach them. The second hypothesis defended that the erasing of occurrences described by the linguists as varieties did not correspond to the standard taught by the school and the language itself, as in the cases of null objects and the position of the clitic pronouns in the statement indicated the prevalence of the TMs in Portuguese standardization. This hypothesis has also been confirmed since the null object is no longer restrict to the oral form of the language and even if it were it could be approached since that the textbooks now present this form and, therefore, must pay attention to its grammar. The approach over the pronominal use has also showed standardization since it favors conservative forms which are no longer used in the Brazilian Portuguese. However, no TM worked with the idea of null object, probably because of the force of the tradition reflected on the contents followed according to the Brazilian Grammatical Nomenclature (BGN). |
id |
UFPB_3ce0234ed359c0eb26036a26b3dcc898 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufpb.br:123456789/21036 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPB |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominalPolíticas linguísticasIdeologias linguísticasManual do professorPadronização da língua portuguesaLanguage policiesLinguistic ideologiesTeacher’s manualStandardization of the portuguese languageCNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICAWe defend the thesis that the Teacher's Manual (TM) in Brazilian Portuguese textbooks, often understood as a mechanism of language policies, has been collaborating since the 1970's, with the imaginary construction of the linguistic homogeneity/standardizing (ORLANDI, 2013; SHOHAMY, 2006) of Brazilian Portuguese, as in the case of pronominal syntax, spreading ideologies which are explicit or implicit (SPOLSKY, 2004; SHOHAMY, 2006) about Portuguese language and its varieties. So, we start from the following questions: which linguistic ideologies are present in TM of Portuguese textbooks? How do the TMs treat pronominal syntax in general and its specific occurrences of Brazilian Portuguese (BP) studied by specialists in specific, and what is the relation of this approach with the ideology of standardization in the language? Our objectives were: general - to unveil the TM as a mechanism of linguistic politics in the process of standardization of the Portuguese language according to the approach made on the pronominal syntax; and specifics - to investigate the linguistic ideologies of the authors in the way they approach Portuguese language and its teaching in the Teacher's Manual and its implications in the process of standardization of the language. It were also necessary concepts such as use, rule, system, standard language, language variety, linguistic purism, standardization and language teaching, discussed by authors like Coseriu (1980), Galves, (1998) Spolsky (2004), Shohamy (2006), Leite (s/d; 2006), Bagno (2004, 2009, 2012, 2019), Mattos e Silva (2000, 2012), Faraco (2016), Faraco e Zilles (2017), Vieira (2018). Our research is documental and the text corpus is constituted of 12 (twelve) TMs from different textbooks, being 6 from 7th grade and 6 from 8th grade of middle school, published between 1970 and 2012. We work with two hypothesis, the first one defended that in the Teacher's Manuals released before the PCN the ideologies related to the necessity of standardization were more explicit, since there was still no explanation in the official documents of the linguistic theories that appeared in the Manuals afterwards, which leads, in the didactic material, to practices with implicit ideologies of standardization. Such hypothesis was confirmed, as the first Manuals showed the language as an expression of thoughts and also used terms like "right/wrong" in a constant way, on the other hand, the evaluation in the most recent ones was done by the selection of contents and in the way to approach them. The second hypothesis defended that the erasing of occurrences described by the linguists as varieties did not correspond to the standard taught by the school and the language itself, as in the cases of null objects and the position of the clitic pronouns in the statement indicated the prevalence of the TMs in Portuguese standardization. This hypothesis has also been confirmed since the null object is no longer restrict to the oral form of the language and even if it were it could be approached since that the textbooks now present this form and, therefore, must pay attention to its grammar. The approach over the pronominal use has also showed standardization since it favors conservative forms which are no longer used in the Brazilian Portuguese. However, no TM worked with the idea of null object, probably because of the force of the tradition reflected on the contents followed according to the Brazilian Grammatical Nomenclature (BGN).NenhumaDefendemos a tese de que o Manual do Professor do Livro Didático de Português, entendido como mecanismo de políticas linguísticas, tem colaborado, desde os anos 1970, com a construção imaginária da unidade e da homogeneidade/padronização linguísticas (ORLANDI, 2013; SHOHAMY, 2006) do português no Brasil, como no caso da sintaxe pronominal, disseminando ideologias que estão explícitas ou implícitas (SPOLSKY, 2004; SHOHAMY, 2006) a respeito da língua portuguesa e de suas variedades. Partimos, então, das seguintes questões: quais ideologias linguísticas estão presentes nos MP/LDP? Como os MP/LDP tratam a sintaxe pronominal em geral, e ocorrências próprias do português brasileiro (PB) estudadas por especialistas, em específico, e qual a relação dessa abordagem com a ideologia da padronização na língua? Nossos objetivos foram: geral – desvelar o MP/LDP como mecanismo de políticas linguísticas no processo de padronização da língua portuguesa conforme a abordagem feita à sintaxe pronominal; e específicos – investigar ideologias linguísticas dos autores na forma de abordar a língua portuguesa e seu ensino nos MP/LDP e descrever a abordagem da sintaxe pronominal do português no MP/LDP e suas implicações no processo de padronização da língua. Foram também necessários conceitos de uso, norma, sistema, norma-padrão, norma culta, purismo linguístico, padronização e ensino de língua, discutidos por autores como Coseriu (1980), Galves (1998), Spolsky (2004), Shohamy (2006), Leite (s/d; 2006), Bagno (2004, 2009, 2012, 2019), Mattos e Silva (2000, 2012), Faraco (2016), Faraco e Zilles (2017), Vieira (2018). Nossa pesquisa foi documental e o corpus se constituiu de 12 (doze) manuais do professor/livros didáticos de Português, sendo 6 (seis) do 8o ano e 6 (seis) do 9o ano, publicados entre 1970 e 2012. Trabalhamos com duas hipóteses, sendo que a primeira defendia que nos MP/LDP anteriores aos PCN, as ideologias referentes à necessidade de padronização da língua portuguesa estão mais explícitas, visto que ainda não havia nos documentos oficiais uma explicitação das teorias linguísticas que passaram a reger os manuais posteriormente, o que leva, no material didático, a práticas com ideologias implícitas de padronização. Tal hipótese foi confirmada na medida em que os primeiros manuais tinham a língua como expressão do pensamento e usavam termos avaliativos (“certo/errado”) de modo constante, ao passo que a avaliação, nos mais recentes, dava-se por meio de seleção de conteúdos e na forma de abordá-los. A segunda hipótese defendia que o apagamento de ocorrências descritas por linguistas de variantes não correspondentes ao padrão ensinado pela escola e próprias do PB, como nos casos do objeto nulo e da posição dos clíticos no enunciado indicava a prevalência nos MP/LDP da padronização do português. Esta hipótese também se confirmou, pois o objeto nulo não está mais restrito à modalidade oral da língua e ainda que estivesse, poderia ser abordado, posto que o LDP ocupa-se de tal modalidade e, consequentemente, deve atentar para a sua gramática. A abordagem da colocação pronominal também indicou padronização por privilegiar formas conservadoras em franco desuso no PB. E, no entanto, nenhum MP/LDP trabalhava com a noção de objeto nulo, provavelmente pela força da tradição, refletida nos conteúdos seguidos conforme a Nomenclatura Gramatical Brasileira (NGB).Universidade Federal da ParaíbaBrasilLinguísticaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em LinguísticaUFPBSousa, Socorro Cláudia Tavares dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2566077699127689Oliveira, Kátia Cristina Cavalcante de2021-09-15T22:58:59Z2020-12-182021-09-15T22:58:59Z2020-07-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesishttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21036porhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPBinstname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)instacron:UFPB2021-09-16T13:45:54Zoai:repositorio.ufpb.br:123456789/21036Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/PUBhttp://tede.biblioteca.ufpb.br:8080/oai/requestdiretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.bropendoar:2021-09-16T13:45:54Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominal |
title |
Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominal |
spellingShingle |
Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominal Oliveira, Kátia Cristina Cavalcante de Políticas linguísticas Ideologias linguísticas Manual do professor Padronização da língua portuguesa Language policies Linguistic ideologies Teacher’s manual Standardization of the portuguese language CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA |
title_short |
Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominal |
title_full |
Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominal |
title_fullStr |
Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominal |
title_sort |
Manual do professor de língua portuguesa: mecanismo de política linguística na padronização do português pela sintaxe pronominal |
author |
Oliveira, Kátia Cristina Cavalcante de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Kátia Cristina Cavalcante de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Sousa, Socorro Cláudia Tavares de http://lattes.cnpq.br/2566077699127689 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Kátia Cristina Cavalcante de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Políticas linguísticas Ideologias linguísticas Manual do professor Padronização da língua portuguesa Language policies Linguistic ideologies Teacher’s manual Standardization of the portuguese language CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA |
topic |
Políticas linguísticas Ideologias linguísticas Manual do professor Padronização da língua portuguesa Language policies Linguistic ideologies Teacher’s manual Standardization of the portuguese language CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA |
description |
We defend the thesis that the Teacher's Manual (TM) in Brazilian Portuguese textbooks, often understood as a mechanism of language policies, has been collaborating since the 1970's, with the imaginary construction of the linguistic homogeneity/standardizing (ORLANDI, 2013; SHOHAMY, 2006) of Brazilian Portuguese, as in the case of pronominal syntax, spreading ideologies which are explicit or implicit (SPOLSKY, 2004; SHOHAMY, 2006) about Portuguese language and its varieties. So, we start from the following questions: which linguistic ideologies are present in TM of Portuguese textbooks? How do the TMs treat pronominal syntax in general and its specific occurrences of Brazilian Portuguese (BP) studied by specialists in specific, and what is the relation of this approach with the ideology of standardization in the language? Our objectives were: general - to unveil the TM as a mechanism of linguistic politics in the process of standardization of the Portuguese language according to the approach made on the pronominal syntax; and specifics - to investigate the linguistic ideologies of the authors in the way they approach Portuguese language and its teaching in the Teacher's Manual and its implications in the process of standardization of the language. It were also necessary concepts such as use, rule, system, standard language, language variety, linguistic purism, standardization and language teaching, discussed by authors like Coseriu (1980), Galves, (1998) Spolsky (2004), Shohamy (2006), Leite (s/d; 2006), Bagno (2004, 2009, 2012, 2019), Mattos e Silva (2000, 2012), Faraco (2016), Faraco e Zilles (2017), Vieira (2018). Our research is documental and the text corpus is constituted of 12 (twelve) TMs from different textbooks, being 6 from 7th grade and 6 from 8th grade of middle school, published between 1970 and 2012. We work with two hypothesis, the first one defended that in the Teacher's Manuals released before the PCN the ideologies related to the necessity of standardization were more explicit, since there was still no explanation in the official documents of the linguistic theories that appeared in the Manuals afterwards, which leads, in the didactic material, to practices with implicit ideologies of standardization. Such hypothesis was confirmed, as the first Manuals showed the language as an expression of thoughts and also used terms like "right/wrong" in a constant way, on the other hand, the evaluation in the most recent ones was done by the selection of contents and in the way to approach them. The second hypothesis defended that the erasing of occurrences described by the linguists as varieties did not correspond to the standard taught by the school and the language itself, as in the cases of null objects and the position of the clitic pronouns in the statement indicated the prevalence of the TMs in Portuguese standardization. This hypothesis has also been confirmed since the null object is no longer restrict to the oral form of the language and even if it were it could be approached since that the textbooks now present this form and, therefore, must pay attention to its grammar. The approach over the pronominal use has also showed standardization since it favors conservative forms which are no longer used in the Brazilian Portuguese. However, no TM worked with the idea of null object, probably because of the force of the tradition reflected on the contents followed according to the Brazilian Grammatical Nomenclature (BGN). |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-18 2020-07-14 2021-09-15T22:58:59Z 2021-09-15T22:58:59Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21036 |
url |
https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21036 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brasil Linguística Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística UFPB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brasil Linguística Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística UFPB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB instname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) instacron:UFPB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) |
instacron_str |
UFPB |
institution |
UFPB |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
diretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.br |
_version_ |
1801842981833015296 |