Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Tiago Jessé Souza de
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/6903
Resumo: ABSTRACT The main objective of the present dissertation was comparing the theories of Schwartz (Universal Theory of Human Values) and Gouveia (Functionalist Theory of Human Values), in function of their hypotheses of content and structure and predictive power. Two empirical studies were designed. The first study aimed to test the hypotheses of content (adequacy of the number of motivational types and subfunctions) and structure (spatial organization of values) of the two models. Participants were 1173 peoples with an average age of 25.1 years (sd = 8.5), they responded the following measures: Basic Values Questionnaire (BVQ), Schwartz Values Survey (SVS) and demographic questions. The hypotheses of content and structure were supported in both models; only in the case of Schwartz model the configuration (structure) differed when the estimator Torgerson was employed in confirmatory multidimensional scaling. Futhermore, the postulated circumplex structure of Schwartz s model was not confirmed. Study 2 assessed the relationship between values and behavior, trying to gauge the predictive power of the two theories. Participants were 836 peoples with an average age of 22.4 years (sd = 7.31), they responded the following measures: BVQ, Portraits Values Questionary (PVQ 21), demographic questions, and two measures of behavior, one for to represent the motivational types of Schwartz and another covering the subfunctions of Gouveia. In general, the two models offered a moderate correlation between values and behavioral indicators. The model of Gouveia (0.47, sd = 0.14) presented average correlations higher than Schwartz s model (0.33, dp = 0.08) [t = - 2.59, p < 0.01]. In conclusion, both theories presented satisfactory results, justifying that are employed in the context of studies on the correlates of human values. However, the model of Gouveia showed something more appropriate, especially when you consider this to be more parsimonious. The limitations of the studies were discussed, indicating that future research may help to know to what extent these models are specific and / or complementary.
id UFPB_5b882fd5dd5866211844d447ac7d99bc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufpb.br:tede/6903
network_acronym_str UFPB
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
repository_id_str
spelling Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.MODELS OF VALUES OF SCHWARTZ AND GOUVEIA: COMPARING CONTENT, STRUCTURE AND PREDICTIVE POWERValores humanosTeoriaConteúdoEstruturaSchwartzGouveiaHuman valuesTheoryContentStructureSchwartzGouveiaCIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIAABSTRACT The main objective of the present dissertation was comparing the theories of Schwartz (Universal Theory of Human Values) and Gouveia (Functionalist Theory of Human Values), in function of their hypotheses of content and structure and predictive power. Two empirical studies were designed. The first study aimed to test the hypotheses of content (adequacy of the number of motivational types and subfunctions) and structure (spatial organization of values) of the two models. Participants were 1173 peoples with an average age of 25.1 years (sd = 8.5), they responded the following measures: Basic Values Questionnaire (BVQ), Schwartz Values Survey (SVS) and demographic questions. The hypotheses of content and structure were supported in both models; only in the case of Schwartz model the configuration (structure) differed when the estimator Torgerson was employed in confirmatory multidimensional scaling. Futhermore, the postulated circumplex structure of Schwartz s model was not confirmed. Study 2 assessed the relationship between values and behavior, trying to gauge the predictive power of the two theories. Participants were 836 peoples with an average age of 22.4 years (sd = 7.31), they responded the following measures: BVQ, Portraits Values Questionary (PVQ 21), demographic questions, and two measures of behavior, one for to represent the motivational types of Schwartz and another covering the subfunctions of Gouveia. In general, the two models offered a moderate correlation between values and behavioral indicators. The model of Gouveia (0.47, sd = 0.14) presented average correlations higher than Schwartz s model (0.33, dp = 0.08) [t = - 2.59, p < 0.01]. In conclusion, both theories presented satisfactory results, justifying that are employed in the context of studies on the correlates of human values. However, the model of Gouveia showed something more appropriate, especially when you consider this to be more parsimonious. The limitations of the studies were discussed, indicating that future research may help to know to what extent these models are specific and / or complementary.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESRESUMO A presente dissertação tem por objetivo principal comparar as teorias de valores de Schwartz (Teoria Universal dos Valores Humanos) e Gouveia (Teoria Funcionalista dos Valores Humanos), considerando suas hipóteses de conteúdo e estrutura e seu poder preditivo. Realizaram-se dois estudos empíricos. O Estudo 1 teve por objetivo testar as hipóteses de conteúdo (adequação do número de tipos motivacionais e subfunções) e estrutura (organização espacial dos valores) dos dois modelos. Participaram 1.173 pessoas com idade média de 25,1 anos (dp = 8,5), os quais responderam os seguintes instrumentos: Questionário dos Valores Básicos (QVB), Questionário de Valores de Schwartz (SVS) e perguntas demográficas. As hipóteses de conteúdo e estrutura foram corroboradas em ambos os modelos; unicamente no caso do modelo de Schwartz a configuração (estrutura) diferiu quando empregado o estimador Torgerson no escalonamento multidimensional confirmatório. Além disso, a estrutura circumplex que este modelo pressupõe não foi confirmada. O Estudo 2 avaliou a relação entre valores e comportamentos, buscando avaliar o poder preditivo das duas teorias. Participaram 836 pessoas com idade média de 22,4 anos (dp = 7,31), que responderam os seguintes instrumentos: QVB, Portraits Values Questionnaire (PVQ-21) e perguntas demográficas, ademais de duas medidas comportamentais, sendo uma para representar os tipos motivacionais de Schwartz e outro que cobria as subfunções de Gouveia. De modo geral, os dois modelos resultaram em correlações moderadas com os indicadores comportamentais, com o modelo de Gouveia apresentando correlação média (0,47, dp = 0,14) superior ao de Schwartz (0,33, dp = 0,08) [t = -2,59, p < 0,01]. Concluindo, ambas as teorias apresentaram resultados satisfatórios, justificando que sejam empregadas no contexto de estudos sobre os correlatos dos valores humanos. Entretanto, ressalta-se que o modelo de Gouveia se mostrado algo mais adequado, sobretudo quando se tem em conta ser este mais parcimonioso. Discutem-se as limitações dos estudos, indicando pesquisas futuras que poderão contribuir para conhecer em que medida tais modelos são específicos e/ou se complementam.Universidade Federal da Paraí­baBRPsicologia SocialPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia SocialUFPBGouveia, Valdiney Velosohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6960379064948678Lima, Tiago Jessé Souza de2015-05-14T13:16:09Z2018-07-23T20:03:00Z2012-11-122018-07-23T20:03:00Z2012-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfLIMA, Tiago Jessé Souza de.Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo. 2012. 171 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia Social) - Universidade Federal da Paraí­ba, João Pessoa, 2012.https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/6903porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPBinstname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)instacron:UFPB2018-09-06T01:47:00Zoai:repositorio.ufpb.br:tede/6903Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/PUBhttp://tede.biblioteca.ufpb.br:8080/oai/requestdiretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.bropendoar:2018-09-06T01:47Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.
MODELS OF VALUES OF SCHWARTZ AND GOUVEIA: COMPARING CONTENT, STRUCTURE AND PREDICTIVE POWER
title Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.
spellingShingle Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.
Lima, Tiago Jessé Souza de
Valores humanos
Teoria
Conteúdo
Estrutura
Schwartz
Gouveia
Human values
Theory
Content
Structure
Schwartz
Gouveia
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
title_short Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.
title_full Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.
title_fullStr Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.
title_full_unstemmed Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.
title_sort Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo.
author Lima, Tiago Jessé Souza de
author_facet Lima, Tiago Jessé Souza de
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Gouveia, Valdiney Veloso
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6960379064948678
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Tiago Jessé Souza de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Valores humanos
Teoria
Conteúdo
Estrutura
Schwartz
Gouveia
Human values
Theory
Content
Structure
Schwartz
Gouveia
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
topic Valores humanos
Teoria
Conteúdo
Estrutura
Schwartz
Gouveia
Human values
Theory
Content
Structure
Schwartz
Gouveia
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
description ABSTRACT The main objective of the present dissertation was comparing the theories of Schwartz (Universal Theory of Human Values) and Gouveia (Functionalist Theory of Human Values), in function of their hypotheses of content and structure and predictive power. Two empirical studies were designed. The first study aimed to test the hypotheses of content (adequacy of the number of motivational types and subfunctions) and structure (spatial organization of values) of the two models. Participants were 1173 peoples with an average age of 25.1 years (sd = 8.5), they responded the following measures: Basic Values Questionnaire (BVQ), Schwartz Values Survey (SVS) and demographic questions. The hypotheses of content and structure were supported in both models; only in the case of Schwartz model the configuration (structure) differed when the estimator Torgerson was employed in confirmatory multidimensional scaling. Futhermore, the postulated circumplex structure of Schwartz s model was not confirmed. Study 2 assessed the relationship between values and behavior, trying to gauge the predictive power of the two theories. Participants were 836 peoples with an average age of 22.4 years (sd = 7.31), they responded the following measures: BVQ, Portraits Values Questionary (PVQ 21), demographic questions, and two measures of behavior, one for to represent the motivational types of Schwartz and another covering the subfunctions of Gouveia. In general, the two models offered a moderate correlation between values and behavioral indicators. The model of Gouveia (0.47, sd = 0.14) presented average correlations higher than Schwartz s model (0.33, dp = 0.08) [t = - 2.59, p < 0.01]. In conclusion, both theories presented satisfactory results, justifying that are employed in the context of studies on the correlates of human values. However, the model of Gouveia showed something more appropriate, especially when you consider this to be more parsimonious. The limitations of the studies were discussed, indicating that future research may help to know to what extent these models are specific and / or complementary.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-11-12
2012-02-29
2015-05-14T13:16:09Z
2018-07-23T20:03:00Z
2018-07-23T20:03:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv LIMA, Tiago Jessé Souza de.Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo. 2012. 171 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia Social) - Universidade Federal da Paraí­ba, João Pessoa, 2012.
https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/6903
identifier_str_mv LIMA, Tiago Jessé Souza de.Modelos de valores de Schwartz e Gouveia: comparando conteúdo, estrutura e poder preditivo. 2012. 171 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia Social) - Universidade Federal da Paraí­ba, João Pessoa, 2012.
url https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/6903
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Paraí­ba
BR
Psicologia Social
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Social
UFPB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Paraí­ba
BR
Psicologia Social
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Social
UFPB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
instname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
instacron:UFPB
instname_str Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
instacron_str UFPB
institution UFPB
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv diretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.br
_version_ 1801842926963130368