Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/4433 |
Resumo: | We make a reflection of a social practice called University Popular Juridical Assessory (AJUP), of our ajupianas practices, of what explicit the statements of its members on its main feature: its capacity for a critical and emancipatory law, a critical and emancipatory university and a critical and emacipatory society, We rescued its theoretical framework on the historical experience of theoretical and practical movements of the critical law from the 1980s and 1990s. But in the context of the university where it happens nowadays, we speak of practice as a university extension, a mark of its political transformative intention, and we identify it with the popular movement of the extension. This characterization, as a practice, highlights the requirement for production of socially useful knowledge in the extension. This characterization emphasizes the popular education as a methodology, but with the multiplicity of meanings that the term includes nowadays, it is necessary understand at the methodological moments the implementation of this practice, our real approximation of the union between theory and practice. In this sense, the systematized experience show us the one hand, the outline of their own way of doing popular extension popular with the Law: a practice with a greater community insertion, where the research is not a preview, but part of the same action, and recognizes that other legal sociability, besides the official ones. But the systematized experience also shows us, however, our difficulties even in this dialogic exercise with the people, in this work guided by an emancipator ethical sense. Thinking practices in an ethical sense is to recognize that every practice brings a social theory (as a way of being, being and knowing), and produces knowledge and transformation (albeit conservatively) in the reflexivity of these modes of relating in the world and with the world. In other words, our practices, as well as the knowledge we produce because of them, are closely related to a model of civilization. It is here that talk about AJUP as a popular extension in law, and about the necessary production of useful knowledge in this practice, takes up the debate on the values in the knowledge. The experiences demonstrate a useful knowledge, produced in the social practice, in relational way in the existential situations of life. And it's acknowledging rationalities different from the rationality of modern science that the popular extension questions deeply the university. The understanding of our difficulties is the recognition that our practices often reproduce the dominant and dominating ethic we criticize, especially when we don t reflect on our cultural conditioning that we are also immersed. In our case, the AJUP, it is important to recognize the limits of our "vision of law", and also the vision of "our law". In this sense, a practice in an ethical-liberator sense means more an attitude of constant questioning of ourselves and our relations with the world, than the reproduction of any model of "emancipatory" practice. It's in fact, an exercise of a profound self-criticism, of ourselves and our practices, that guides us to bridge the gaps between our say and our doing, for the concrete realization of a liberating practice and in a University Popular Juridical Assessory. |
id |
UFPB_5fd0d09b804812805a5a353aeefa7f2b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufpb.br:tede/4433 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPB |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimentoAssessoria Jurídica Universitária PopularExtensão PopularProdução de ConhecimentoMetodologiaUniversity Popular Juridical AssessoryPopular ExtensionProduction of knowledgeMethodologyCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOWe make a reflection of a social practice called University Popular Juridical Assessory (AJUP), of our ajupianas practices, of what explicit the statements of its members on its main feature: its capacity for a critical and emancipatory law, a critical and emancipatory university and a critical and emacipatory society, We rescued its theoretical framework on the historical experience of theoretical and practical movements of the critical law from the 1980s and 1990s. But in the context of the university where it happens nowadays, we speak of practice as a university extension, a mark of its political transformative intention, and we identify it with the popular movement of the extension. This characterization, as a practice, highlights the requirement for production of socially useful knowledge in the extension. This characterization emphasizes the popular education as a methodology, but with the multiplicity of meanings that the term includes nowadays, it is necessary understand at the methodological moments the implementation of this practice, our real approximation of the union between theory and practice. In this sense, the systematized experience show us the one hand, the outline of their own way of doing popular extension popular with the Law: a practice with a greater community insertion, where the research is not a preview, but part of the same action, and recognizes that other legal sociability, besides the official ones. But the systematized experience also shows us, however, our difficulties even in this dialogic exercise with the people, in this work guided by an emancipator ethical sense. Thinking practices in an ethical sense is to recognize that every practice brings a social theory (as a way of being, being and knowing), and produces knowledge and transformation (albeit conservatively) in the reflexivity of these modes of relating in the world and with the world. In other words, our practices, as well as the knowledge we produce because of them, are closely related to a model of civilization. It is here that talk about AJUP as a popular extension in law, and about the necessary production of useful knowledge in this practice, takes up the debate on the values in the knowledge. The experiences demonstrate a useful knowledge, produced in the social practice, in relational way in the existential situations of life. And it's acknowledging rationalities different from the rationality of modern science that the popular extension questions deeply the university. The understanding of our difficulties is the recognition that our practices often reproduce the dominant and dominating ethic we criticize, especially when we don t reflect on our cultural conditioning that we are also immersed. In our case, the AJUP, it is important to recognize the limits of our "vision of law", and also the vision of "our law". In this sense, a practice in an ethical-liberator sense means more an attitude of constant questioning of ourselves and our relations with the world, than the reproduction of any model of "emancipatory" practice. It's in fact, an exercise of a profound self-criticism, of ourselves and our practices, that guides us to bridge the gaps between our say and our doing, for the concrete realization of a liberating practice and in a University Popular Juridical Assessory.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFazemos aqui uma reflexão de uma prática social denominada Assessoria Jurídica Universitária Popular (AJUP). Das nossas próprias práticas ajupianas, naquilo que as falas dos seus membros explicitam sobre sua característica principal: sua capacidade crítica e emancipatória do direito, da universidade e da sociedade. Resgatamos seu marco teórico na experiência histórica dos movimentos teórico-práticos críticos do direito da década de 1980 e 1990. Mas no contexto da universidade em que se realiza hoje, falamos da prática enquanto uma extensão universitária e, marca de sua intencionalidade política transformadora, a identificamos com o movimento da extensão popular. Caracterização que, como uma práxis, ressalta a exigência de produção de conhecimento socialmente útil na extensão. Esta caracterização enfatiza a educação popular como metodologia, mas na pluralidade de sentidos que o termo abrange hoje torna necessário perceber nos momentos metodológicos de implementação dessa práxis nossa real aproximação da unidade teórico-prática. Nesse sentido, as experiências sistematizadas nos mostram por um lado, o esboço de um modo próprio de fazer extensão popular em direito: um fazer com uma maior inserção comunitária, em que a investigação não é uma prévia, senão, parte mesma da ação, e que reconhece sociabilidades jurídicas outras, além das oficiais. Mas mostram-nos também, por outro lado, nossas dificuldades ainda nesse exercício dialógico com o povo, nesse trabalho orientado por um sentido ético libertador. Pensar nas práticas em sentido ético é reconhecer que toda prática social traz consigo uma teoria (como modo de ser, estar e conhecer), e produz conhecimento e transformação (ainda que conservadora) na reflexividade desses modos de se relacionar no mundo e com o mundo. Ou seja, nossas práticas, assim como o conhecimento que produzimos nelas, estão intimamente relacionadas a um modelo civilizatório. É aqui que falar em AJUP como extensão popular em direito, e da necessária produção de conhecimento útil nesta prática, retoma o debate do valor no conhecimento. As experiências demonstram um conhecimento útil, produzido na prática social, de modo relacional nas situações existenciais da vida. E é reconhecendo racionalidades diversas da racionalidade da ciência moderna que a extensão popular questiona profundamente a universidade. A compreensão das nossas dificuldades está no reconhecimento de que nossas práticas reproduzem muitas vezes a ética dominante e dominadora que tanto criticamos, especialmente quando não refletimos sobre os condicionados culturais em que também estamos imersos. No nosso caso da AJUP, é importante reconhecer os limites do nosso olhar do direito , e também, do olhar do nosso direito . Nesse sentido, uma prática em sentido ético-libertador significa mais uma postura de questionamento constante de nós próprios e nossas relações com o mundo, que da reprodução de qualquer modelo de prática emancipatória . É no fundo um exercício de profunda autocrítica, de nós mesmos e de nossas práticas, que nos orienta para diminuir as distâncias entre nosso dizer e nosso fazer, para a realização concreta de uma prática libertadora e em Assessoria Jurídica Universitária Popular.Universidade Federal da ParaíbaBRciências JuridicasPrograma de Pós Graduação em Ciências JurídicasUFPBPimentel, José Ernestohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7080009412950359Miranda, Carla2015-05-07T14:27:24Z2018-07-20T23:49:02Z2010-06-102018-07-20T23:49:02Z2010-06-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfMIRANDA, Carla. Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento. 2010. 157 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em ciências Juridicas) - Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, 2010.https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/4433porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPBinstname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)instacron:UFPB2018-09-06T00:20:27Zoai:repositorio.ufpb.br:tede/4433Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/PUBhttp://tede.biblioteca.ufpb.br:8080/oai/requestdiretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.bropendoar:2018-09-06T00:20:27Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento |
title |
Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento |
spellingShingle |
Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento Miranda, Carla Assessoria Jurídica Universitária Popular Extensão Popular Produção de Conhecimento Metodologia University Popular Juridical Assessory Popular Extension Production of knowledge Methodology CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento |
title_full |
Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento |
title_fullStr |
Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento |
title_full_unstemmed |
Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento |
title_sort |
Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento |
author |
Miranda, Carla |
author_facet |
Miranda, Carla |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Pimentel, José Ernesto http://lattes.cnpq.br/7080009412950359 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Miranda, Carla |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Assessoria Jurídica Universitária Popular Extensão Popular Produção de Conhecimento Metodologia University Popular Juridical Assessory Popular Extension Production of knowledge Methodology CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
topic |
Assessoria Jurídica Universitária Popular Extensão Popular Produção de Conhecimento Metodologia University Popular Juridical Assessory Popular Extension Production of knowledge Methodology CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
We make a reflection of a social practice called University Popular Juridical Assessory (AJUP), of our ajupianas practices, of what explicit the statements of its members on its main feature: its capacity for a critical and emancipatory law, a critical and emancipatory university and a critical and emacipatory society, We rescued its theoretical framework on the historical experience of theoretical and practical movements of the critical law from the 1980s and 1990s. But in the context of the university where it happens nowadays, we speak of practice as a university extension, a mark of its political transformative intention, and we identify it with the popular movement of the extension. This characterization, as a practice, highlights the requirement for production of socially useful knowledge in the extension. This characterization emphasizes the popular education as a methodology, but with the multiplicity of meanings that the term includes nowadays, it is necessary understand at the methodological moments the implementation of this practice, our real approximation of the union between theory and practice. In this sense, the systematized experience show us the one hand, the outline of their own way of doing popular extension popular with the Law: a practice with a greater community insertion, where the research is not a preview, but part of the same action, and recognizes that other legal sociability, besides the official ones. But the systematized experience also shows us, however, our difficulties even in this dialogic exercise with the people, in this work guided by an emancipator ethical sense. Thinking practices in an ethical sense is to recognize that every practice brings a social theory (as a way of being, being and knowing), and produces knowledge and transformation (albeit conservatively) in the reflexivity of these modes of relating in the world and with the world. In other words, our practices, as well as the knowledge we produce because of them, are closely related to a model of civilization. It is here that talk about AJUP as a popular extension in law, and about the necessary production of useful knowledge in this practice, takes up the debate on the values in the knowledge. The experiences demonstrate a useful knowledge, produced in the social practice, in relational way in the existential situations of life. And it's acknowledging rationalities different from the rationality of modern science that the popular extension questions deeply the university. The understanding of our difficulties is the recognition that our practices often reproduce the dominant and dominating ethic we criticize, especially when we don t reflect on our cultural conditioning that we are also immersed. In our case, the AJUP, it is important to recognize the limits of our "vision of law", and also the vision of "our law". In this sense, a practice in an ethical-liberator sense means more an attitude of constant questioning of ourselves and our relations with the world, than the reproduction of any model of "emancipatory" practice. It's in fact, an exercise of a profound self-criticism, of ourselves and our practices, that guides us to bridge the gaps between our say and our doing, for the concrete realization of a liberating practice and in a University Popular Juridical Assessory. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06-10 2010-06-04 2015-05-07T14:27:24Z 2018-07-20T23:49:02Z 2018-07-20T23:49:02Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
MIRANDA, Carla. Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento. 2010. 157 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em ciências Juridicas) - Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, 2010. https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/4433 |
identifier_str_mv |
MIRANDA, Carla. Na práxis da assessoria jurídica universitária popular: extensão e produção de conhecimento. 2010. 157 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em ciências Juridicas) - Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, 2010. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/4433 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba BR ciências Juridicas Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Jurídicas UFPB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba BR ciências Juridicas Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Jurídicas UFPB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB instname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) instacron:UFPB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) |
instacron_str |
UFPB |
institution |
UFPB |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
diretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.br |
_version_ |
1801842881045987328 |