Direitos humanos e vida extrauterina: risco versus responsabilidade na manipulação de matéria biológica humana nos tratamentos de reprodução medicamente assistida

• Autor(a) principal: Costa, Ana Paula Correia de Albuquerque da
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/9644
• topic: Reprodução humana assistida; Matéria biológica humana; Direitos humanos; Risco; Responsabilidade; Assisted human reproduction; Human biological material; Human rights; Risk; Responsibility; CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

Improvements in science and reproductive technology reached levels never before imagined. With real possibilities of genetic manipulation, extrauterine pregnancy and consequent economic fallout attached to them, It must be questioned the risks involved in procedures which emerged once just to help people achieve family planning. Moreover, these technologies have brought to the world elements whose concepts originally known by the law apparently presented as insufficient to cover, which are the gametes and embryos in vitro, still in need of specific regulation in Brazil. From the reality that is announced, the present thesis proposed to solve the following problem: in the absence of law about in Brazil, how to deal with ethical, legal, economic and social impact on the assisted human reproduction techniques, more specifically with regard to the use of gametes and embryos? How conceptualize them and what their Staff Regulations to be followed? In order to make a critical analysis of AHR procedures from the Resolution No. 2,121 / 2015 of the Federal Medical Council in the light of the principles of civil and constitutional law. To do so, it followed the deductive method of approach, starting from a set of ideas and rules relating to civil law institutes to analyze specific aspects of the legal protection of AHR techniques, production of gametes and embryos, concluding following a decreasing order of reasoning. In what regards the methods of procedure, reconciled to the historical method, in view of the concept of the evolution of the study and methods of AHR and legal standards, particularly of civil law, relevant affiliation and family entities; the interpretative method, from the deepening of doctrinal interpretation of the concepts mentioned above associated with the rules of public and private law applicable to the species, and the comparative method, through analysis of the rules applicable to foreign law. In the end, we came to the conclusion as to the most appropriate legal status to gametes and embryos, and established guidelines for proper protection, based on an ethic of responsibility.