Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of Pernambuco
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos Universitários (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/estudosuniversitarios/article/view/253516 |
Resumo: | This study has sought to analyze the views of people from Pernambuco’s countryside, both from the academic world and outside it, regarding vac-cines and their efficiency to combat COVID-19, focusing on argumentation and scientific literacy. The research was the result of the discipline “Argu-mentation and Scientific Literacy”, of the Communication course linked to the Academic Center in the Northeastern Agreste (CAA/UFPE), located in the city of Caruaru. The data collection occurred through a survey on Google Forms, composed of open and multiple choice questions. A total of 53 survey respondents were contemplated, from various cities in the countryside of Pernambuco, with ages ranging from 16 to 76. The answers showed that 52 respondents positioned themselves in favor of vaccines, while one stated to be more or less in favor. In addition, 41 respondents said they believe in the effectiveness of vaccines, while 11 were uncertain about it. The arguments theorized about cause and effect, pragmatic, me-ans and ends, authority, symbolic and examplary types, as advocated by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), and, with the data analysis, it has been noted that the indicators of scientific literacy, proposed by Sasseron and Carvalho (2011), were present in the arguments of both people from academia and outside it, showing varying degrees of scientific literacy. The respondents stated that television newscasts, social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Youtube) and internet research were the main sources of information that subsidized the arguments presented. |
id |
UFPE-6_6210975ee03d26cb4dfb91c9501ac74e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.periodicos.ufpe.br:article/253516 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPE-6 |
network_name_str |
Estudos Universitários (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of PernambucoArgumentos científicos sobre as vacinas contra a Covid-19 no interior de Pernambucoargumentationscientific literacyCOVID-19vaccinesargumentaçãoletramento científicoCovid-19vacinasThis study has sought to analyze the views of people from Pernambuco’s countryside, both from the academic world and outside it, regarding vac-cines and their efficiency to combat COVID-19, focusing on argumentation and scientific literacy. The research was the result of the discipline “Argu-mentation and Scientific Literacy”, of the Communication course linked to the Academic Center in the Northeastern Agreste (CAA/UFPE), located in the city of Caruaru. The data collection occurred through a survey on Google Forms, composed of open and multiple choice questions. A total of 53 survey respondents were contemplated, from various cities in the countryside of Pernambuco, with ages ranging from 16 to 76. The answers showed that 52 respondents positioned themselves in favor of vaccines, while one stated to be more or less in favor. In addition, 41 respondents said they believe in the effectiveness of vaccines, while 11 were uncertain about it. The arguments theorized about cause and effect, pragmatic, me-ans and ends, authority, symbolic and examplary types, as advocated by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), and, with the data analysis, it has been noted that the indicators of scientific literacy, proposed by Sasseron and Carvalho (2011), were present in the arguments of both people from academia and outside it, showing varying degrees of scientific literacy. The respondents stated that television newscasts, social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Youtube) and internet research were the main sources of information that subsidized the arguments presented.Esta pesquisa buscou analisar o posicionamento de pessoas do interior de Pernambuco, tanto do mundo acadêmico quanto de fora, sobre as vacinas e sua eficiência no combate à Covid-19, com foco na argumentação e no letramento científico. A pesquisa foi fruto da disciplina “Argumentação e Letramento Científico”, do curso de Comunicação Social vinculado ao Centro Acadêmico do Agreste da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (CAA/UFPE), situado na cidade de Caruaru. A coleta dos dados ocorreu através do Formulários Google e o questionário foi composto por perguntas abertas e de múltipla escolha. Foram contemplados 53 respondentes no total, oriundos de várias cidades do interior de Pernambuco, com idades de 16 a 76 anos. As respostas mostraram que 52 respondentes se posicionaram a favor das vacinas e 1 afirmou que era mais ou menos a favor. Além disso, 41 respondentes acreditavam na eficiência das vacinas, enquanto 11 assinalaram “mais ou menos”. Os argumentos teorizaram acerca dos tipos causa e efeito, pragmático, meios e fins, de autoridade, simbólico e de exemplo, conforme preconizam Perelman e Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), e, com a análise dos dados, percebeu-se que os indicadores da alfabetização científica propostos por Sasseron e Carvalho (2011) estavam presentes nos argumentos dos universitários e dos não universitários, apresentando graus de letramento científico diversos. Os investigados afirmaram que os jornais de televisão, as redes sociais (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Youtube) e as buscas na internet foram as principais fontes de informações que subsidiaram as argumentações apresentadas.Universidade Federal de Pernambuco2022-05-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/estudosuniversitarios/article/view/25351610.51359/2675-7354.2022.253516Estudos Universitários; v. 39 n. 1 (2022): Ciência, cultura, linguagem e democracia: desafios contemporâneos; 193-2282675-73540425-4082reponame:Estudos Universitários (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)instacron:UFPEporhttps://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/estudosuniversitarios/article/view/253516/41220Copyright (c) 2022 Estudos Universitáriosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Ana Cristina Barbosa daMorais, Milena Jayne dos Santos2023-07-19T16:44:51Zoai:oai.periodicos.ufpe.br:article/253516Revistahttps://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/estudosuniversitariosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/estudosuniversitarios/oaiestudosuniversitarios@ufpe.br2675-73540425-4082opendoar:2023-07-19T16:44:51Estudos Universitários (Online) - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of Pernambuco Argumentos científicos sobre as vacinas contra a Covid-19 no interior de Pernambuco |
title |
Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of Pernambuco |
spellingShingle |
Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of Pernambuco Silva, Ana Cristina Barbosa da argumentation scientific literacy COVID-19 vaccines argumentação letramento científico Covid-19 vacinas |
title_short |
Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of Pernambuco |
title_full |
Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of Pernambuco |
title_fullStr |
Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of Pernambuco |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of Pernambuco |
title_sort |
Scientific arguments regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the countryside of Pernambuco |
author |
Silva, Ana Cristina Barbosa da |
author_facet |
Silva, Ana Cristina Barbosa da Morais, Milena Jayne dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Morais, Milena Jayne dos Santos |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Ana Cristina Barbosa da Morais, Milena Jayne dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
argumentation scientific literacy COVID-19 vaccines argumentação letramento científico Covid-19 vacinas |
topic |
argumentation scientific literacy COVID-19 vaccines argumentação letramento científico Covid-19 vacinas |
description |
This study has sought to analyze the views of people from Pernambuco’s countryside, both from the academic world and outside it, regarding vac-cines and their efficiency to combat COVID-19, focusing on argumentation and scientific literacy. The research was the result of the discipline “Argu-mentation and Scientific Literacy”, of the Communication course linked to the Academic Center in the Northeastern Agreste (CAA/UFPE), located in the city of Caruaru. The data collection occurred through a survey on Google Forms, composed of open and multiple choice questions. A total of 53 survey respondents were contemplated, from various cities in the countryside of Pernambuco, with ages ranging from 16 to 76. The answers showed that 52 respondents positioned themselves in favor of vaccines, while one stated to be more or less in favor. In addition, 41 respondents said they believe in the effectiveness of vaccines, while 11 were uncertain about it. The arguments theorized about cause and effect, pragmatic, me-ans and ends, authority, symbolic and examplary types, as advocated by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), and, with the data analysis, it has been noted that the indicators of scientific literacy, proposed by Sasseron and Carvalho (2011), were present in the arguments of both people from academia and outside it, showing varying degrees of scientific literacy. The respondents stated that television newscasts, social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Youtube) and internet research were the main sources of information that subsidized the arguments presented. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/estudosuniversitarios/article/view/253516 10.51359/2675-7354.2022.253516 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/estudosuniversitarios/article/view/253516 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.51359/2675-7354.2022.253516 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/estudosuniversitarios/article/view/253516/41220 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Estudos Universitários info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Estudos Universitários |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Universitários; v. 39 n. 1 (2022): Ciência, cultura, linguagem e democracia: desafios contemporâneos; 193-228 2675-7354 0425-4082 reponame:Estudos Universitários (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) instacron:UFPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
instacron_str |
UFPE |
institution |
UFPE |
reponame_str |
Estudos Universitários (Online) |
collection |
Estudos Universitários (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Universitários (Online) - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
estudosuniversitarios@ufpe.br |
_version_ |
1796798323088162816 |