The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maia, Lídia Raquel Herculano
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Thaiane, Massarani, Luisa, Santos Júnior, Marcelo Alves dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Intexto (Porto Alegre)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/127361
Resumo: This paper analyzes the characteristics of the contestation discourse against Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram Brazil. We identified four groups, from descriptors associated with the vaccine theme, that addressed the vaccine issue from December 2020 to February 2022. Using the Grounded Theory method, we performed a qualitative analysis of the main arguments, to contest vaccines, presented in those groups. The results reveal three lines of argument used to question Covid-19 vaccines: (1) fears about safety and efficacy, (2) claims of obscure interests in the management of the pandemic and the development of vaccines and (3) defense of freedom and privacy. the comprehension of those arguments aims to contribute to the development of strategies to contain the damage caused by misinformation regarding individual and collective health.
id UFRGS-6_271e49ca3d4d1217162ea721e81bc678
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/127361
network_acronym_str UFRGS-6
network_name_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository_id_str
spelling The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in BrazilA contestação às vacinas contra Covid-19 em grupos do Telegram no BrasilTelegramvaccinesCovid-19TelegramvacinasCovid-19This paper analyzes the characteristics of the contestation discourse against Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram Brazil. We identified four groups, from descriptors associated with the vaccine theme, that addressed the vaccine issue from December 2020 to February 2022. Using the Grounded Theory method, we performed a qualitative analysis of the main arguments, to contest vaccines, presented in those groups. The results reveal three lines of argument used to question Covid-19 vaccines: (1) fears about safety and efficacy, (2) claims of obscure interests in the management of the pandemic and the development of vaccines and (3) defense of freedom and privacy. the comprehension of those arguments aims to contribute to the development of strategies to contain the damage caused by misinformation regarding individual and collective health.Neste artigo, analisamos as características do discurso de contestação às vacinas contra Covid-19 no Telegram no Brasil. A partir de descritores associados ao tema da vacina, identificamos quatro grupos que abordaram a questão vacinal no período de dezembro de 2020 a fevereiro de 2022. Utilizando o método da Teoria Fundamentada, realizamos uma análise qualitativa dos principais argumentos apresentados para a contestação às vacinas nesses grupos. Os resultados revelam três linhas argumentativas utilizadas na contestação aos imunizantes contra Covid-19: (1) receios quanto à segurança e eficácia, (2) alegações de que existem interesses obscuros na gestão da pandemia e no desenvolvimento das vacinas e (3) defesa da liberdade e privacidade. A compreensão desses argumentos visa contribuir para o desenvolvimento de estratégias de contenção dos danos causados pela desinformação quanto à saúde individual e coletiva.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2023-03-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/12736110.19132/1807-8583.55.127361Intexto; No. 55 (2023); 127361Intexto; Núm. 55 (2023); 127361Intexto; No. 55 (2023); 127361Intexto; N. 55 (2023); 127361Intexto; n. 55 (2023); 1273611807-8583reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/127361/88117Copyright (c) 2023 Lídia Raquel Herculano Maia, Thaiane Oliveira, Luisa Massarani, Marcelo Alves dos Santos Júniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaia, Lídia Raquel HerculanoOliveira, ThaianeMassarani, LuisaSantos Júnior, Marcelo Alves dos2023-12-13T15:30:34Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/127361Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intextoONGhttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intexto/oai||intexto@ufrgs.br1807-85831807-8583opendoar:2023-12-13T15:30:34Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in Brazil
A contestação às vacinas contra Covid-19 em grupos do Telegram no Brasil
title The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in Brazil
spellingShingle The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in Brazil
Maia, Lídia Raquel Herculano
Telegram
vaccines
Covid-19
Telegram
vacinas
Covid-19
title_short The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in Brazil
title_full The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in Brazil
title_fullStr The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in Brazil
title_sort The contestation of Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram groups in Brazil
author Maia, Lídia Raquel Herculano
author_facet Maia, Lídia Raquel Herculano
Oliveira, Thaiane
Massarani, Luisa
Santos Júnior, Marcelo Alves dos
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Thaiane
Massarani, Luisa
Santos Júnior, Marcelo Alves dos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maia, Lídia Raquel Herculano
Oliveira, Thaiane
Massarani, Luisa
Santos Júnior, Marcelo Alves dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Telegram
vaccines
Covid-19
Telegram
vacinas
Covid-19
topic Telegram
vaccines
Covid-19
Telegram
vacinas
Covid-19
description This paper analyzes the characteristics of the contestation discourse against Covid-19 vaccines on Telegram Brazil. We identified four groups, from descriptors associated with the vaccine theme, that addressed the vaccine issue from December 2020 to February 2022. Using the Grounded Theory method, we performed a qualitative analysis of the main arguments, to contest vaccines, presented in those groups. The results reveal three lines of argument used to question Covid-19 vaccines: (1) fears about safety and efficacy, (2) claims of obscure interests in the management of the pandemic and the development of vaccines and (3) defense of freedom and privacy. the comprehension of those arguments aims to contribute to the development of strategies to contain the damage caused by misinformation regarding individual and collective health.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/127361
10.19132/1807-8583.55.127361
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/127361
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1807-8583.55.127361
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/127361/88117
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Intexto; No. 55 (2023); 127361
Intexto; Núm. 55 (2023); 127361
Intexto; No. 55 (2023); 127361
Intexto; N. 55 (2023); 127361
Intexto; n. 55 (2023); 127361
1807-8583
reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
collection Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||intexto@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766111631179776

Registros relacionados