DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Okumura, Mercedes
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos do LEPAARQ
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/5623
Resumo: Popularly known as "arrowheads", the projectile points associated with the Umbu Tradition in southern and southeastern Brazil have been lacking research about how they have been used. There are important variations in size between arrowheads and dart points, given the differences in their associated technological propulsions. Using the technique proposed by Shott (1997), this work aims, in a preliminary way, to better understand the use of darts and arrows in southeastern and southern Brazil during prehistory. The sample comprised points from eight sites from southern and southeastern Brazil, dating from the late Pleistocene to the late Holocene. At least one set of points, dated from the early Holocene, presented quite high proportion of points that could be considered as arrowheads, indicating the presence of points that could be potentially used as arrows.
id UFPEL-2_c3c750768bbb6b4c07f3dbda8985fc21
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.ufpel:article/5623
network_acronym_str UFPEL-2
network_name_str Cadernos do LEPAARQ
repository_id_str
spelling DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.Dardo ou flecha? Testes e reflexões sobre a tecnologia de uso de pontas de projétil no Sudeste e Sul do Brasil durante a pré-históriaArchaeologyDartArrowLithicsUmbu Tradition.ArqueologiaDardoFlechalLíticosTradição UmbuPopularly known as "arrowheads", the projectile points associated with the Umbu Tradition in southern and southeastern Brazil have been lacking research about how they have been used. There are important variations in size between arrowheads and dart points, given the differences in their associated technological propulsions. Using the technique proposed by Shott (1997), this work aims, in a preliminary way, to better understand the use of darts and arrows in southeastern and southern Brazil during prehistory. The sample comprised points from eight sites from southern and southeastern Brazil, dating from the late Pleistocene to the late Holocene. At least one set of points, dated from the early Holocene, presented quite high proportion of points that could be considered as arrowheads, indicating the presence of points that could be potentially used as arrows.Resumo: Conhecidas popularmente como “pontas de flecha”, as pontas de projétil associadas à Tradição Umbu no sul e sudeste brasileiros carecem de investigação acerca do modo como foram utilizadas. Há variações importantes de tamanho entre pontas de flecha e pontas de dardo, dadas as diferenças tecnológicas associadas aos meios de propulsão utilizados. Este trabalho visa explorar de maneira preliminar, através da técnica proposta por Shott (1997), a questão sobre o uso de dardos e flechas no sudeste e sul do Brasil durante a pré-história. Foram analisadas pontas de oito sítios do sul e sudeste do Brasil, datados desde o Pleistoceno tardio até o Holoceno final. Pelo menos um conjunto de pontas, datado do início do Holoceno, apresentou uma proporção relativamente alta de pontas classificadas com “flecha”, indicando a presença de pontas que potencialmente poderiam ser usadas nesse sistema. Abstract: Popularly known as "arrowheads", the projectile points associated with the Umbu Tradition in southern and southeastern Brazil have been lacking research about how they have been used. There are important variations in size between arrowheads and dart points, given the differences in their associated technological propulsions. Using the technique proposed by Shott (1997), this work aims, in a preliminary way, to better understand the use of darts and arrows in southeastern and southern Brazil during prehistory. The sample comprised points from eight sites from southern and southeastern Brazil, dating from the late Pleistocene to the late Holocene. At least one set of points, dated from the early Holocene, presented quite high proportion of points that could be considered as arrowheads, indicating the presence of points that could be potentially used as arrows. Universidade Federal de Pelotas2015-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.ms-excelhttps://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/562310.15210/lepaarq.v12i24.5623Cadernos do LEPAARQ (UFPEL); V. 12, N. 24 (2015): JUL-DEC; 7-325391545420; V. 12, N. 24 (2015): JUL-DEC; 7-322316-84121806-911810.15210/lepaarq.v12i24reponame:Cadernos do LEPAARQinstname:Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)instacron:UFPELporhttps://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/5623/4487https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/5623/17221https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/5623/17223Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos do LEPAARQinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOkumura, Mercedes2020-07-29T22:03:30Zoai:ojs.ufpel:article/5623Revistahttps://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/ojs2/index.php/lepaarq/indexPUBhttp://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/ojs2/index.php/lepaarq/oaimilheirarafael@gmail.com||brunoleo.ribeiro@gmail.com||milheirarafael@gmail.com|| brunoleo.ribeiro@gmail.com2316-84121806-9118opendoar:2020-07-29T22:03:30Cadernos do LEPAARQ - Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.
Dardo ou flecha? Testes e reflexões sobre a tecnologia de uso de pontas de projétil no Sudeste e Sul do Brasil durante a pré-história
title DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.
spellingShingle DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.
Okumura, Mercedes
Archaeology
Dart
Arrow
Lithics
Umbu Tradition.
Arqueologia
Dardo
Flechal
Líticos
Tradição Umbu
title_short DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.
title_full DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.
title_fullStr DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.
title_full_unstemmed DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.
title_sort DART OR ARROW? STATISTICAL TESTS AND REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNOLOGY OF PROJECTILE POINTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN BRAZIL DURING PREHISTORY.
author Okumura, Mercedes
author_facet Okumura, Mercedes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Okumura, Mercedes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Archaeology
Dart
Arrow
Lithics
Umbu Tradition.
Arqueologia
Dardo
Flechal
Líticos
Tradição Umbu
topic Archaeology
Dart
Arrow
Lithics
Umbu Tradition.
Arqueologia
Dardo
Flechal
Líticos
Tradição Umbu
description Popularly known as "arrowheads", the projectile points associated with the Umbu Tradition in southern and southeastern Brazil have been lacking research about how they have been used. There are important variations in size between arrowheads and dart points, given the differences in their associated technological propulsions. Using the technique proposed by Shott (1997), this work aims, in a preliminary way, to better understand the use of darts and arrows in southeastern and southern Brazil during prehistory. The sample comprised points from eight sites from southern and southeastern Brazil, dating from the late Pleistocene to the late Holocene. At least one set of points, dated from the early Holocene, presented quite high proportion of points that could be considered as arrowheads, indicating the presence of points that could be potentially used as arrows.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/5623
10.15210/lepaarq.v12i24.5623
url https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/5623
identifier_str_mv 10.15210/lepaarq.v12i24.5623
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/5623/4487
https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/5623/17221
https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/lepaarq/article/view/5623/17223
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos do LEPAARQ
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos do LEPAARQ
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/vnd.ms-excel
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Pelotas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Pelotas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos do LEPAARQ (UFPEL); V. 12, N. 24 (2015): JUL-DEC; 7-32
5391545420; V. 12, N. 24 (2015): JUL-DEC; 7-32
2316-8412
1806-9118
10.15210/lepaarq.v12i24
reponame:Cadernos do LEPAARQ
instname:Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)
instacron:UFPEL
instname_str Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)
instacron_str UFPEL
institution UFPEL
reponame_str Cadernos do LEPAARQ
collection Cadernos do LEPAARQ
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos do LEPAARQ - Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv milheirarafael@gmail.com||brunoleo.ribeiro@gmail.com||milheirarafael@gmail.com|| brunoleo.ribeiro@gmail.com
_version_ 1799756125936025600

Registros relacionados