A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coelho-De-Souza, Fábio Herrmann
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Camargo, Junara Cristina, Beskow, Tiago, Balestrin, Matheus Dalmolin, Klein-Júnior, Celso Afonso, Demarco, Flávio Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46216
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the performance of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel, after 1-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen volunteers requiring at least two posterior composite restorations were selected. Twenty-nine cavities were performed, comprising 14 without bevel (butt joint) and 15 with bevel preparation of the enamel cavosurface angle. All cavities were restored with simplified adhesive system (Adper Single Bond) and composite resin (Filtek P60). A halogen light curing unit was used through the study. Restorations were polished immediately. Analysis was carried out at baseline, after 6 months and after 1 year by a calibrated evaluator (Kappa), according to the FDI criteria. Data were statistically analyzed by Mann-Whitney test (p
id USP-17_f3ef2883a836519816440760efd0dfec
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/46216
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-upClinical trialComposite resinsBevelDental restoration^i1^spermanOBJECTIVE: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the performance of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel, after 1-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen volunteers requiring at least two posterior composite restorations were selected. Twenty-nine cavities were performed, comprising 14 without bevel (butt joint) and 15 with bevel preparation of the enamel cavosurface angle. All cavities were restored with simplified adhesive system (Adper Single Bond) and composite resin (Filtek P60). A halogen light curing unit was used through the study. Restorations were polished immediately. Analysis was carried out at baseline, after 6 months and after 1 year by a calibrated evaluator (Kappa), according to the FDI criteria. Data were statistically analyzed by Mann-Whitney test (p Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2012-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/4621610.1590/S1678-77572012000200009Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2012); 174-179Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2012); 174-179Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 20 n. 2 (2012); 174-1791678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46216/49838Copyright (c) 2012 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho-De-Souza, Fábio HerrmannCamargo, Junara CristinaBeskow, TiagoBalestrin, Matheus DalmolinKlein-Júnior, Celso AfonsoDemarco, Flávio Fernando2012-10-18T19:34:53Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/46216Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-10-18T19:34:53Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
title A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
spellingShingle A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
Coelho-De-Souza, Fábio Herrmann
Clinical trial
Composite resins
Bevel
Dental restoration^i1^sperman
title_short A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
title_full A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
title_fullStr A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
title_sort A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
author Coelho-De-Souza, Fábio Herrmann
author_facet Coelho-De-Souza, Fábio Herrmann
Camargo, Junara Cristina
Beskow, Tiago
Balestrin, Matheus Dalmolin
Klein-Júnior, Celso Afonso
Demarco, Flávio Fernando
author_role author
author2 Camargo, Junara Cristina
Beskow, Tiago
Balestrin, Matheus Dalmolin
Klein-Júnior, Celso Afonso
Demarco, Flávio Fernando
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coelho-De-Souza, Fábio Herrmann
Camargo, Junara Cristina
Beskow, Tiago
Balestrin, Matheus Dalmolin
Klein-Júnior, Celso Afonso
Demarco, Flávio Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clinical trial
Composite resins
Bevel
Dental restoration^i1^sperman
topic Clinical trial
Composite resins
Bevel
Dental restoration^i1^sperman
description OBJECTIVE: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the performance of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel, after 1-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen volunteers requiring at least two posterior composite restorations were selected. Twenty-nine cavities were performed, comprising 14 without bevel (butt joint) and 15 with bevel preparation of the enamel cavosurface angle. All cavities were restored with simplified adhesive system (Adper Single Bond) and composite resin (Filtek P60). A halogen light curing unit was used through the study. Restorations were polished immediately. Analysis was carried out at baseline, after 6 months and after 1 year by a calibrated evaluator (Kappa), according to the FDI criteria. Data were statistically analyzed by Mann-Whitney test (p
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46216
10.1590/S1678-77572012000200009
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46216
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572012000200009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/46216/49838
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2012); 174-179
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2012); 174-179
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 20 n. 2 (2012); 174-179
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221676958384128

Registros relacionados