Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748 |
Resumo: | There are authors such as Klima e Bellugi (1979), Ferreira-Brito (1995), Taub (2001), Wilcox (2004) e Xavier (2006), who consider iconicity as being significantly present in sign languages (SLs). In this paper, we discuss and question the notions of arbitrariness and iconicity in sign languages and more specifically in Libras. To do so, we verified how the existing literature approaches these concepts in relation to sign languages, and we analyzed the signs annotated in Capovilla et al. (2017) with words initialized by letter 'A' concerning their possible motivations. Altogether, we assume and argue that arbitrariness and iconicity are not opposing notions, and they are concepts of different orders; we demonstrate that arbitrariness and immotivation, on the one hand, and iconicity and motivation, on the other hand, are not synonymous (KLIMA; BELLUGI, 1979; FRYDRYCH, 2012); and we point out that signs of Libras are highly motivated and, in most cases, are made up from more than one motivation. We have detected and classified six kinds of motivations, which are: (1) classifiers; (2) gestuality; (3) spatiality; (4) linguistic borrowing from Portuguese; (5) non-manual markers; and (6) movement. From this categorization, we have observed that one lexical item can present more than one kind of motivation, and that not all types of motivations are iconic. We concluded the paper presenting a proposal of gradation that involves since signs that are less iconic to signs that are more iconic. |
id |
UFPR-12_07585cde2a651f2307eb0dc7199685fe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1748 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in LibrasIcônico ou arbitrário? Motivado ou imotivado? Diferentes tipos de motivação em sinais da LibrasArbitrariedadeIconicidadeMotivação linguísticaLínguas de sinaisLibrasArbitrarinessIconicityLinguistic motivationSign LanguagesLibrasThere are authors such as Klima e Bellugi (1979), Ferreira-Brito (1995), Taub (2001), Wilcox (2004) e Xavier (2006), who consider iconicity as being significantly present in sign languages (SLs). In this paper, we discuss and question the notions of arbitrariness and iconicity in sign languages and more specifically in Libras. To do so, we verified how the existing literature approaches these concepts in relation to sign languages, and we analyzed the signs annotated in Capovilla et al. (2017) with words initialized by letter 'A' concerning their possible motivations. Altogether, we assume and argue that arbitrariness and iconicity are not opposing notions, and they are concepts of different orders; we demonstrate that arbitrariness and immotivation, on the one hand, and iconicity and motivation, on the other hand, are not synonymous (KLIMA; BELLUGI, 1979; FRYDRYCH, 2012); and we point out that signs of Libras are highly motivated and, in most cases, are made up from more than one motivation. We have detected and classified six kinds of motivations, which are: (1) classifiers; (2) gestuality; (3) spatiality; (4) linguistic borrowing from Portuguese; (5) non-manual markers; and (6) movement. From this categorization, we have observed that one lexical item can present more than one kind of motivation, and that not all types of motivations are iconic. We concluded the paper presenting a proposal of gradation that involves since signs that are less iconic to signs that are more iconic.Autores como Klima e Bellugi (1979), Ferreira-Brito (1995), Taub (2001), Wilcox (2004) e Xavier (2006) consideram que a iconicidade está significativamente presente nas línguas de sinais (LSs). Neste artigo, (re)discutimos e problematizamos as noções de arbitrariedade e de iconicidade nas LSs, especificamente na Libras. Para isso, fizemos uma revisão na literatura, a fim de verificar como esses conceitos vêm sendo abordados em LSs, e analisamos os sinais glosados no dicionário de Capovilla et al. (2017) com palavras iniciadas pela letra “A”, visando identificar as possíveis motivações que eles apresentam. De modo geral, assumimos que a arbitrariedade e a iconicidade não são noções opostas, nem sequer de mesma ordem; que os conceitos de arbitrariedade e de imotivação, por um lado, e de iconicidade e de motivação, por outro lado, não são sinônimos (KLIMA; BELLUGI, 1979; FRYDRYCH, 2012); e apontamos que os sinais da Libras são altamente motivados, apresentando, na maioria das vezes, mais de um tipo de motivação. A partir das análises, identificamos e categorizamos motivações de seis tipos, baseadas em: (1) classificadores, (2) gestualidade, (3) espacialidade, (4) empréstimo linguístico do português, (5) expressão não manual, e (6) movimento. A partir dessa categorização, observamos que um mesmo item lexical pode apresentar mais de um tipo de motivação e que nem todo tipo de motivação confere iconicidade ao signo linguístico. Concluímos o trabalho apresentando uma proposta de continuum de gradação que envolve desde sinais menos icônicos a sinais mais icônicosAssociação Brasileira de Linguística2021-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/174810.25189/rabralin.v20i2.1748Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 2 (2021); 1-29Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 2 (2021); 1-290102-715810.25189/rabralin.v20i2reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748/2454https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748/2461Copyright (c) 2021 Davi Vieira Medeiros, Aline Garcia Rodero-Takahirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros, Davi VieiraRodero-Takahira, Aline Garcia2021-09-24T17:51:06Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1748Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2021-09-24T17:51:06Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras Icônico ou arbitrário? Motivado ou imotivado? Diferentes tipos de motivação em sinais da Libras |
title |
Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras |
spellingShingle |
Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras Medeiros, Davi Vieira Arbitrariedade Iconicidade Motivação linguística Línguas de sinais Libras Arbitrariness Iconicity Linguistic motivation Sign Languages Libras |
title_short |
Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras |
title_full |
Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras |
title_fullStr |
Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras |
title_full_unstemmed |
Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras |
title_sort |
Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras |
author |
Medeiros, Davi Vieira |
author_facet |
Medeiros, Davi Vieira Rodero-Takahira, Aline Garcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodero-Takahira, Aline Garcia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros, Davi Vieira Rodero-Takahira, Aline Garcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arbitrariedade Iconicidade Motivação linguística Línguas de sinais Libras Arbitrariness Iconicity Linguistic motivation Sign Languages Libras |
topic |
Arbitrariedade Iconicidade Motivação linguística Línguas de sinais Libras Arbitrariness Iconicity Linguistic motivation Sign Languages Libras |
description |
There are authors such as Klima e Bellugi (1979), Ferreira-Brito (1995), Taub (2001), Wilcox (2004) e Xavier (2006), who consider iconicity as being significantly present in sign languages (SLs). In this paper, we discuss and question the notions of arbitrariness and iconicity in sign languages and more specifically in Libras. To do so, we verified how the existing literature approaches these concepts in relation to sign languages, and we analyzed the signs annotated in Capovilla et al. (2017) with words initialized by letter 'A' concerning their possible motivations. Altogether, we assume and argue that arbitrariness and iconicity are not opposing notions, and they are concepts of different orders; we demonstrate that arbitrariness and immotivation, on the one hand, and iconicity and motivation, on the other hand, are not synonymous (KLIMA; BELLUGI, 1979; FRYDRYCH, 2012); and we point out that signs of Libras are highly motivated and, in most cases, are made up from more than one motivation. We have detected and classified six kinds of motivations, which are: (1) classifiers; (2) gestuality; (3) spatiality; (4) linguistic borrowing from Portuguese; (5) non-manual markers; and (6) movement. From this categorization, we have observed that one lexical item can present more than one kind of motivation, and that not all types of motivations are iconic. We concluded the paper presenting a proposal of gradation that involves since signs that are less iconic to signs that are more iconic. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748 10.25189/rabralin.v20i2.1748 |
url |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25189/rabralin.v20i2.1748 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748/2454 https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748/2461 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Davi Vieira Medeiros, Aline Garcia Rodero-Takahira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Davi Vieira Medeiros, Aline Garcia Rodero-Takahira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 2 (2021); 1-29 Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 2 (2021); 1-29 0102-7158 10.25189/rabralin.v20i2 reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org |
_version_ |
1798329771353964544 |