Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Medeiros, Davi Vieira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rodero-Takahira, Aline Garcia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748
Resumo: There are authors such as Klima e Bellugi (1979), Ferreira-Brito (1995), Taub (2001), Wilcox (2004) e Xavier (2006), who consider iconicity as being significantly present in sign languages (SLs). In this paper, we discuss and question the notions of arbitrariness and iconicity in sign languages and more specifically in Libras. To do so, we verified how the existing literature approaches these concepts in relation to sign languages, and we analyzed the signs annotated in Capovilla et al. (2017) with words initialized by letter 'A' concerning their possible motivations. Altogether, we assume and argue that arbitrariness and iconicity are not opposing notions, and they are concepts of different orders; we demonstrate that arbitrariness and immotivation, on the one hand, and iconicity and motivation, on the other hand, are not synonymous (KLIMA; BELLUGI, 1979; FRYDRYCH, 2012); and we point out that signs of Libras are highly motivated and, in most cases, are made up from more than one motivation. We have detected and classified six kinds of motivations, which are: (1) classifiers; (2) gestuality; (3) spatiality; (4) linguistic borrowing from Portuguese; (5) non-manual markers; and (6) movement. From this categorization, we have observed that one lexical item can present more than one kind of motivation, and that not all types of motivations are iconic. We concluded the paper presenting a proposal of gradation that involves since signs that are less iconic to signs that are more iconic.
id UFPR-12_07585cde2a651f2307eb0dc7199685fe
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1748
network_acronym_str UFPR-12
network_name_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in LibrasIcônico ou arbitrário? Motivado ou imotivado? Diferentes tipos de motivação em sinais da LibrasArbitrariedadeIconicidadeMotivação linguísticaLínguas de sinaisLibrasArbitrarinessIconicityLinguistic motivationSign LanguagesLibrasThere are authors such as Klima e Bellugi (1979), Ferreira-Brito (1995), Taub (2001), Wilcox (2004) e Xavier (2006), who consider iconicity as being significantly present in sign languages (SLs). In this paper, we discuss and question the notions of arbitrariness and iconicity in sign languages and more specifically in Libras. To do so, we verified how the existing literature approaches these concepts in relation to sign languages, and we analyzed the signs annotated in Capovilla et al. (2017) with words initialized by letter 'A' concerning their possible motivations. Altogether, we assume and argue that arbitrariness and iconicity are not opposing notions, and they are concepts of different orders; we demonstrate that arbitrariness and immotivation, on the one hand, and iconicity and motivation, on the other hand, are not synonymous (KLIMA; BELLUGI, 1979; FRYDRYCH, 2012); and we point out that signs of Libras are highly motivated and, in most cases, are made up from more than one motivation. We have detected and classified six kinds of motivations, which are: (1) classifiers; (2) gestuality; (3) spatiality; (4) linguistic borrowing from Portuguese; (5) non-manual markers; and (6) movement. From this categorization, we have observed that one lexical item can present more than one kind of motivation, and that not all types of motivations are iconic. We concluded the paper presenting a proposal of gradation that involves since signs that are less iconic to signs that are more iconic.Autores como Klima e Bellugi (1979), Ferreira-Brito (1995), Taub (2001), Wilcox (2004) e Xavier (2006) consideram que a iconicidade está significativamente presente nas línguas de sinais (LSs). Neste artigo, (re)discutimos e problematizamos as noções de arbitrariedade e de iconicidade nas LSs, especificamente na Libras. Para isso, fizemos uma revisão na literatura, a fim de verificar como esses conceitos vêm sendo abordados em LSs, e analisamos os sinais glosados no dicionário de Capovilla et al. (2017) com palavras iniciadas pela letra “A”, visando identificar as possíveis motivações que eles apresentam. De modo geral, assumimos que a arbitrariedade e a iconicidade não são noções opostas, nem sequer de mesma ordem; que os conceitos de arbitrariedade e de imotivação, por um lado, e de iconicidade e de motivação, por outro lado, não são sinônimos (KLIMA; BELLUGI, 1979; FRYDRYCH, 2012); e apontamos que os sinais da Libras são altamente motivados, apresentando, na maioria das vezes, mais de um tipo de motivação. A partir das análises, identificamos e categorizamos motivações de seis tipos, baseadas em: (1) classificadores, (2) gestualidade, (3) espacialidade, (4) empréstimo linguístico do português, (5) expressão não manual, e (6) movimento. A partir dessa categorização, observamos que um mesmo item lexical pode apresentar mais de um tipo de motivação e que nem todo tipo de motivação confere iconicidade ao signo linguístico. Concluímos o trabalho apresentando uma proposta de continuum de gradação que envolve desde sinais menos icônicos a sinais mais icônicosAssociação Brasileira de Linguística2021-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/174810.25189/rabralin.v20i2.1748Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 2 (2021); 1-29Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 2 (2021); 1-290102-715810.25189/rabralin.v20i2reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748/2454https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748/2461Copyright (c) 2021 Davi Vieira Medeiros, Aline Garcia Rodero-Takahirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros, Davi VieiraRodero-Takahira, Aline Garcia2021-09-24T17:51:06Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1748Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2021-09-24T17:51:06Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras
Icônico ou arbitrário? Motivado ou imotivado? Diferentes tipos de motivação em sinais da Libras
title Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras
spellingShingle Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras
Medeiros, Davi Vieira
Arbitrariedade
Iconicidade
Motivação linguística
Línguas de sinais
Libras
Arbitrariness
Iconicity
Linguistic motivation
Sign Languages
Libras
title_short Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras
title_full Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras
title_fullStr Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras
title_full_unstemmed Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras
title_sort Iconic or arbitrary? Motivated or immotivated? Different kinds of motivation in signs in Libras
author Medeiros, Davi Vieira
author_facet Medeiros, Davi Vieira
Rodero-Takahira, Aline Garcia
author_role author
author2 Rodero-Takahira, Aline Garcia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Medeiros, Davi Vieira
Rodero-Takahira, Aline Garcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arbitrariedade
Iconicidade
Motivação linguística
Línguas de sinais
Libras
Arbitrariness
Iconicity
Linguistic motivation
Sign Languages
Libras
topic Arbitrariedade
Iconicidade
Motivação linguística
Línguas de sinais
Libras
Arbitrariness
Iconicity
Linguistic motivation
Sign Languages
Libras
description There are authors such as Klima e Bellugi (1979), Ferreira-Brito (1995), Taub (2001), Wilcox (2004) e Xavier (2006), who consider iconicity as being significantly present in sign languages (SLs). In this paper, we discuss and question the notions of arbitrariness and iconicity in sign languages and more specifically in Libras. To do so, we verified how the existing literature approaches these concepts in relation to sign languages, and we analyzed the signs annotated in Capovilla et al. (2017) with words initialized by letter 'A' concerning their possible motivations. Altogether, we assume and argue that arbitrariness and iconicity are not opposing notions, and they are concepts of different orders; we demonstrate that arbitrariness and immotivation, on the one hand, and iconicity and motivation, on the other hand, are not synonymous (KLIMA; BELLUGI, 1979; FRYDRYCH, 2012); and we point out that signs of Libras are highly motivated and, in most cases, are made up from more than one motivation. We have detected and classified six kinds of motivations, which are: (1) classifiers; (2) gestuality; (3) spatiality; (4) linguistic borrowing from Portuguese; (5) non-manual markers; and (6) movement. From this categorization, we have observed that one lexical item can present more than one kind of motivation, and that not all types of motivations are iconic. We concluded the paper presenting a proposal of gradation that involves since signs that are less iconic to signs that are more iconic.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748
10.25189/rabralin.v20i2.1748
url https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748
identifier_str_mv 10.25189/rabralin.v20i2.1748
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748/2454
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1748/2461
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Davi Vieira Medeiros, Aline Garcia Rodero-Takahira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Davi Vieira Medeiros, Aline Garcia Rodero-Takahira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 2 (2021); 1-29
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 2 (2021); 1-29
0102-7158
10.25189/rabralin.v20i2
reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
collection Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org
_version_ 1798329771353964544