Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written texts
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1883 |
Resumo: | When conducting research in the area of literacies, one of the challenging issues is: how could the writer’s literacies be perceived in the text production? Specially for the Applied Linguistics, that question is an intriguing one since, although there is plenty of research in the area, only a few projects do not require interviews, as the theoretical and methodological approach comes from the ethnographic research. The dialogic discursive perspective is presented in this study with the purpose to ponder about another research method. Thus, a comparison between those perspectives is made, highlighting initially their characteristics and implications. Subsequently, I expatiate on the investigation of the data from a dialogic discursive perspective related to the history of literacies. The corpus under analysis is formed of 2 essays written during a Fuvest university entrance examination and the chosen method is based on the indiciary paradigm (GINZBURG, 1989) associated with Bakhtin’s and the Circle’s Discourse Analysis and with Literacy – or the Literacies – (KLEIMAN, 1995; 2007; SOARES 2005; STREET, 2003; 2012, 2014). The aim of this study is to search for signs of the history of the writer’s literacies in the construction of “work” as the object of discourse in the Fuvestessays. The results indicate that the dialogic discursive perspective, related to the history of the writer’s literacies, delineates a tendency for the analysis of literacies in essays. |
id |
UFPR-12_55bf7aa503db9b46b0dd1ae799e24763 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1883 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written textsLetramentos e perspectiva discursiva dialógica: possibilidade de se observar a história de letramentos em textos escritosAnálise do DiscursoObjeto de discursoVozes sociaisSaberes formais e informaisArgumentosDiscourse AnalysisObject of discourseSocial VoicesFormal and informal knowledgeArgumentsWhen conducting research in the area of literacies, one of the challenging issues is: how could the writer’s literacies be perceived in the text production? Specially for the Applied Linguistics, that question is an intriguing one since, although there is plenty of research in the area, only a few projects do not require interviews, as the theoretical and methodological approach comes from the ethnographic research. The dialogic discursive perspective is presented in this study with the purpose to ponder about another research method. Thus, a comparison between those perspectives is made, highlighting initially their characteristics and implications. Subsequently, I expatiate on the investigation of the data from a dialogic discursive perspective related to the history of literacies. The corpus under analysis is formed of 2 essays written during a Fuvest university entrance examination and the chosen method is based on the indiciary paradigm (GINZBURG, 1989) associated with Bakhtin’s and the Circle’s Discourse Analysis and with Literacy – or the Literacies – (KLEIMAN, 1995; 2007; SOARES 2005; STREET, 2003; 2012, 2014). The aim of this study is to search for signs of the history of the writer’s literacies in the construction of “work” as the object of discourse in the Fuvestessays. The results indicate that the dialogic discursive perspective, related to the history of the writer’s literacies, delineates a tendency for the analysis of literacies in essays.Ao realizar pesquisa na área de letramentos, uma das questões desafiadoras é: como observar os letramentos do escrevente na produção de texto? Em especial, para a Linguística Aplicada trata-se de uma questão instigante, pois embora haja vasto número de pesquisas na área, são poucas as pesquisas que não necessitem de entrevista, pois o cunho teórico e metodológico é o da pesquisa etnográfica. Com o propósito de refletir sobre outro modo de pesquisa, apresenta-se a perspectiva discursiva dialógica. Realiza-se, então, um cotejo entre as perspectivas destacando a princípio suas características e suas implicações. Prossegue-se discorrendo sobre a investigação dos dados na perspectiva discursiva dialógica relacionada à história de letramentos. O corpus a ser analisado é composto de 2 redações do exame de vestibular da Fuvest de gênero dissertativo e o método delineado é o paradigma indiciário (GINZBURG, 1989) associado à Análise do discurso de Bakhtin e do Círculo e ao(s) Letramentos (KLEIMAN, 1995; 2007; SOARES 2005; STREET, 2003; 2012; 2014). Estabelece-se como objetivo deste estudo: buscar indícios da história de letramentos do escrevente na construção do objeto de discurso trabalho em redações de vestibular de cunho dissertativo. Os resultados apontam que a perspectiva discursiva dialógica relacionada à história de letramentos do escrevente baliza um encaminhamento para se observarem os letramentos nas produções escritas dissertativas.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2021-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/188310.25189/rabralin.v20i3.1883Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 3 (2021); 1202-1218Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 3 (2021); 1202-12180102-715810.25189/rabralin.v20i3reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1883/2493Copyright (c) 2021 Vanda Mari Trombettainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrombetta, Vanda Mari2021-12-23T21:25:08Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1883Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2021-12-23T21:25:08Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written texts Letramentos e perspectiva discursiva dialógica: possibilidade de se observar a história de letramentos em textos escritos |
title |
Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written texts |
spellingShingle |
Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written texts Trombetta, Vanda Mari Análise do Discurso Objeto de discurso Vozes sociais Saberes formais e informais Argumentos Discourse Analysis Object of discourse Social Voices Formal and informal knowledge Arguments |
title_short |
Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written texts |
title_full |
Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written texts |
title_fullStr |
Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written texts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written texts |
title_sort |
Literacies and the dialogic discursive perspective: possibility of observing the history of literacies in written texts |
author |
Trombetta, Vanda Mari |
author_facet |
Trombetta, Vanda Mari |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Trombetta, Vanda Mari |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Análise do Discurso Objeto de discurso Vozes sociais Saberes formais e informais Argumentos Discourse Analysis Object of discourse Social Voices Formal and informal knowledge Arguments |
topic |
Análise do Discurso Objeto de discurso Vozes sociais Saberes formais e informais Argumentos Discourse Analysis Object of discourse Social Voices Formal and informal knowledge Arguments |
description |
When conducting research in the area of literacies, one of the challenging issues is: how could the writer’s literacies be perceived in the text production? Specially for the Applied Linguistics, that question is an intriguing one since, although there is plenty of research in the area, only a few projects do not require interviews, as the theoretical and methodological approach comes from the ethnographic research. The dialogic discursive perspective is presented in this study with the purpose to ponder about another research method. Thus, a comparison between those perspectives is made, highlighting initially their characteristics and implications. Subsequently, I expatiate on the investigation of the data from a dialogic discursive perspective related to the history of literacies. The corpus under analysis is formed of 2 essays written during a Fuvest university entrance examination and the chosen method is based on the indiciary paradigm (GINZBURG, 1989) associated with Bakhtin’s and the Circle’s Discourse Analysis and with Literacy – or the Literacies – (KLEIMAN, 1995; 2007; SOARES 2005; STREET, 2003; 2012, 2014). The aim of this study is to search for signs of the history of the writer’s literacies in the construction of “work” as the object of discourse in the Fuvestessays. The results indicate that the dialogic discursive perspective, related to the history of the writer’s literacies, delineates a tendency for the analysis of literacies in essays. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1883 10.25189/rabralin.v20i3.1883 |
url |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1883 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25189/rabralin.v20i3.1883 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1883/2493 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Vanda Mari Trombetta info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Vanda Mari Trombetta |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 3 (2021); 1202-1218 Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 3 (2021); 1202-1218 0102-7158 10.25189/rabralin.v20i3 reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org |
_version_ |
1798329771847843840 |