Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057 |
Resumo: | The aim of the study was to identify, synthesize and classify the software currently available that can help in the task of phonetic transcription of the spontaneous speech of pre-school children to evaluate the development of children's language. A systematic review was performed for articles published, for the 10-year period (June 2010 to June 2020), without restrictions as to location and language, using the Cochrane, Pubmed and Web of Science databases. The terms used in the search strategies were "phonological", "phonetic", "transcription", "computer" and "software". The studies were selected by two independent reviewers using pre-defined search strategies. In the initial search, after the exclusion of duplicates, 534 articles were found. By reading their titles and abstracts, 46 articles related to the theme were left, which were then read in full. After reading, 24 articles were included in the study. The results revealed a total of seven software available for the phonetic transcription of spontaneous speech from preschoolers used for different analyses: LENA and Timestamper (for babbling and pre-linguistic vocalizations), ELAN (for gestural communication, extralinguistic elements and the situational context), Phon (for phonetic and phonological analyses), CLAN and SALT (for morphosyntactic, grammatical and semantic aspects) and Praat (for acoustic measurements). Through this systematic review, it can be concluded that there are advantages to using software for phonetic transcription, sample storage, and child language analysis, especially concerning standardization and reliability for spontaneous speech samples. Phonetic transcription still relies on the ability and subjectivity of a human transcriber. The tools found in the software provide support to facilitate using phonetic symbols, audio segmentation and pairing to writing, and analysis of speech data. |
id |
UFPR-12_8192c9fa5cde3d84b1c38650cad553cb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/2057 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic reviewTranscrição fonética da fala espontânea de crianças com auxílio de software: uma revisão sistemáticaFonética. Linguagem Infantil. Software. Desenvolvimento da Linguagem.Phonetics, Child Language, Software, Language Development.The aim of the study was to identify, synthesize and classify the software currently available that can help in the task of phonetic transcription of the spontaneous speech of pre-school children to evaluate the development of children's language. A systematic review was performed for articles published, for the 10-year period (June 2010 to June 2020), without restrictions as to location and language, using the Cochrane, Pubmed and Web of Science databases. The terms used in the search strategies were "phonological", "phonetic", "transcription", "computer" and "software". The studies were selected by two independent reviewers using pre-defined search strategies. In the initial search, after the exclusion of duplicates, 534 articles were found. By reading their titles and abstracts, 46 articles related to the theme were left, which were then read in full. After reading, 24 articles were included in the study. The results revealed a total of seven software available for the phonetic transcription of spontaneous speech from preschoolers used for different analyses: LENA and Timestamper (for babbling and pre-linguistic vocalizations), ELAN (for gestural communication, extralinguistic elements and the situational context), Phon (for phonetic and phonological analyses), CLAN and SALT (for morphosyntactic, grammatical and semantic aspects) and Praat (for acoustic measurements). Through this systematic review, it can be concluded that there are advantages to using software for phonetic transcription, sample storage, and child language analysis, especially concerning standardization and reliability for spontaneous speech samples. Phonetic transcription still relies on the ability and subjectivity of a human transcriber. The tools found in the software provide support to facilitate using phonetic symbols, audio segmentation and pairing to writing, and analysis of speech data.O objetivo do estudo foi identificar, sintetizar e classificar os softwares atualmente disponíveis que podem auxiliar na tarefa de transcrição fonética da fala espontânea de pré-escolares, para avaliar o desenvolvimento da linguagem infantil. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática de artigos publicados, no período de 10 anos (de junho de 2010 a junho de 2020), sem restrições quanto à localização e idioma, utilizando as bases de dados Cochrane, Pubmed e Web of Science. Os termos utilizados nas estratégias de busca foram "fonológico", "fonético", "transcrição", "computador" e "software". Os estudos foram selecionados por dois revisores independentes usando estratégias de busca pré-definidas. Na busca inicial, após a exclusão de duplicatas, foram encontrados 534 artigos. Com a leitura de seus títulos e resumos, restaram 46 artigos relacionados ao tema, que foram lidos na íntegra. Após a leitura, 24 artigos foram incluídos no estudo. Os resultados revelaram um total de sete softwares disponíveis para auxiliar a transcrição fonética da fala espontânea de pré-escolares utilizados para diferentes análises: LENA e Timestamper (para balbucios e vocalizações pré-linguísticas), ELAN (para comunicação gestual, elementos extralinguísticos e contexto situacional), Phon (para análises fonéticas e fonológicas), CLAN e SALT (para aspectos morfossintáticos, gramaticais e semânticos) e Praat (para medidas acústicas). Por meio desta revisão sistemática, pode-se concluir que há vantagens no uso de software para transcrição fonética, armazenamento de amostras e análise de linguagem infantil, principalmente no que diz respeito à padronização e confiabilidade para amostras de fala espontânea. A transcrição fonética ainda depende de um transcritor humano. As ferramentas encontradas nos softwares fornecem suporte para facilitar o uso dos símbolos fonéticos, segmentação e pareamento de áudio para escrita e análises de dados de fala.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2022-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/205710.25189/rabralin.v21i2.2057Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 2 (2022); 10-31Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 2 (2022); 10-310102-715810.25189/rabralin.v21i2reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057/2696Copyright (c) 2023 Debora Tomazi Moreira Caumo, Márcio Pezzini França, Clécio Homrich da Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaumo, Débora Tomazi MoreiraFrança, Márcio PezziniHomrich da Silva, Clécio2023-05-04T19:01:50Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/2057Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2023-05-04T19:01:50Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review Transcrição fonética da fala espontânea de crianças com auxílio de software: uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review Caumo, Débora Tomazi Moreira Fonética. Linguagem Infantil. Software. Desenvolvimento da Linguagem. Phonetics, Child Language, Software, Language Development. |
title_short |
Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review |
title_full |
Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review |
author |
Caumo, Débora Tomazi Moreira |
author_facet |
Caumo, Débora Tomazi Moreira França, Márcio Pezzini Homrich da Silva, Clécio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
França, Márcio Pezzini Homrich da Silva, Clécio |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caumo, Débora Tomazi Moreira França, Márcio Pezzini Homrich da Silva, Clécio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fonética. Linguagem Infantil. Software. Desenvolvimento da Linguagem. Phonetics, Child Language, Software, Language Development. |
topic |
Fonética. Linguagem Infantil. Software. Desenvolvimento da Linguagem. Phonetics, Child Language, Software, Language Development. |
description |
The aim of the study was to identify, synthesize and classify the software currently available that can help in the task of phonetic transcription of the spontaneous speech of pre-school children to evaluate the development of children's language. A systematic review was performed for articles published, for the 10-year period (June 2010 to June 2020), without restrictions as to location and language, using the Cochrane, Pubmed and Web of Science databases. The terms used in the search strategies were "phonological", "phonetic", "transcription", "computer" and "software". The studies were selected by two independent reviewers using pre-defined search strategies. In the initial search, after the exclusion of duplicates, 534 articles were found. By reading their titles and abstracts, 46 articles related to the theme were left, which were then read in full. After reading, 24 articles were included in the study. The results revealed a total of seven software available for the phonetic transcription of spontaneous speech from preschoolers used for different analyses: LENA and Timestamper (for babbling and pre-linguistic vocalizations), ELAN (for gestural communication, extralinguistic elements and the situational context), Phon (for phonetic and phonological analyses), CLAN and SALT (for morphosyntactic, grammatical and semantic aspects) and Praat (for acoustic measurements). Through this systematic review, it can be concluded that there are advantages to using software for phonetic transcription, sample storage, and child language analysis, especially concerning standardization and reliability for spontaneous speech samples. Phonetic transcription still relies on the ability and subjectivity of a human transcriber. The tools found in the software provide support to facilitate using phonetic symbols, audio segmentation and pairing to writing, and analysis of speech data. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057 10.25189/rabralin.v21i2.2057 |
url |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25189/rabralin.v21i2.2057 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057/2696 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Debora Tomazi Moreira Caumo, Márcio Pezzini França, Clécio Homrich da Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Debora Tomazi Moreira Caumo, Márcio Pezzini França, Clécio Homrich da Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 2 (2022); 10-31 Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 2 (2022); 10-31 0102-7158 10.25189/rabralin.v21i2 reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org |
_version_ |
1798329768205090816 |