Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caumo, Débora Tomazi Moreira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: França, Márcio Pezzini, Homrich da Silva, Clécio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057
Resumo: The aim of the study was to identify, synthesize and classify the software currently available that can help in the task of phonetic transcription of the spontaneous speech of pre-school children to evaluate the development of children's language. A systematic review was performed for articles published, for the 10-year period (June 2010 to June 2020), without restrictions as to location and language, using the Cochrane, Pubmed and Web of Science databases. The terms used in the search strategies were "phonological", "phonetic", "transcription", "computer" and "software". The studies were selected by two independent reviewers using pre-defined search strategies. In the initial search, after the exclusion of duplicates, 534 articles were found. By reading their titles and abstracts, 46 articles related to the theme were left, which were then read in full. After reading, 24 articles were included in the study. The results revealed a total of seven software available for the phonetic transcription of spontaneous speech from preschoolers used for different analyses: LENA and Timestamper (for babbling and pre-linguistic vocalizations), ELAN (for gestural communication, extralinguistic elements and the situational context), Phon (for phonetic and phonological analyses), CLAN and SALT (for morphosyntactic, grammatical and semantic aspects) and Praat (for acoustic measurements). Through this systematic review, it can be concluded that there are advantages to using software for phonetic transcription, sample storage, and child language analysis, especially concerning standardization and reliability for spontaneous speech samples. Phonetic transcription still relies on the ability and subjectivity of a human transcriber. The tools found in the software provide support to facilitate using phonetic symbols, audio segmentation and pairing to writing, and analysis of speech data.
id UFPR-12_8192c9fa5cde3d84b1c38650cad553cb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/2057
network_acronym_str UFPR-12
network_name_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic reviewTranscrição fonética da fala espontânea de crianças com auxílio de software: uma revisão sistemáticaFonética. Linguagem Infantil. Software. Desenvolvimento da Linguagem.Phonetics, Child Language, Software, Language Development.The aim of the study was to identify, synthesize and classify the software currently available that can help in the task of phonetic transcription of the spontaneous speech of pre-school children to evaluate the development of children's language. A systematic review was performed for articles published, for the 10-year period (June 2010 to June 2020), without restrictions as to location and language, using the Cochrane, Pubmed and Web of Science databases. The terms used in the search strategies were "phonological", "phonetic", "transcription", "computer" and "software". The studies were selected by two independent reviewers using pre-defined search strategies. In the initial search, after the exclusion of duplicates, 534 articles were found. By reading their titles and abstracts, 46 articles related to the theme were left, which were then read in full. After reading, 24 articles were included in the study. The results revealed a total of seven software available for the phonetic transcription of spontaneous speech from preschoolers used for different analyses: LENA and Timestamper (for babbling and pre-linguistic vocalizations), ELAN (for gestural communication, extralinguistic elements and the situational context), Phon (for phonetic and phonological analyses), CLAN and SALT (for morphosyntactic, grammatical and semantic aspects) and Praat (for acoustic measurements). Through this systematic review, it can be concluded that there are advantages to using software for phonetic transcription, sample storage, and child language analysis, especially concerning standardization and reliability for spontaneous speech samples. Phonetic transcription still relies on the ability and subjectivity of a human transcriber. The tools found in the software provide support to facilitate using phonetic symbols, audio segmentation and pairing to writing, and analysis of speech data.O objetivo do estudo foi identificar, sintetizar e classificar os softwares atualmente disponíveis que podem auxiliar na tarefa de transcrição fonética da fala espontânea de pré-escolares, para avaliar o desenvolvimento da linguagem infantil. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática de artigos publicados, no período de 10 anos (de junho de 2010 a junho de 2020), sem restrições quanto à localização e idioma, utilizando as bases de dados Cochrane, Pubmed e Web of Science. Os termos utilizados nas estratégias de busca foram "fonológico", "fonético", "transcrição", "computador" e "software". Os estudos foram selecionados por dois revisores independentes usando estratégias de busca pré-definidas. Na busca inicial, após a exclusão de duplicatas, foram encontrados 534 artigos. Com a leitura de seus títulos e resumos, restaram 46 artigos relacionados ao tema, que foram lidos na íntegra. Após a leitura, 24 artigos foram incluídos no estudo. Os resultados revelaram um total de sete softwares disponíveis para auxiliar a transcrição fonética da fala espontânea de pré-escolares utilizados para diferentes análises: LENA e Timestamper (para balbucios e vocalizações pré-linguísticas), ELAN (para comunicação gestual, elementos extralinguísticos e contexto situacional), Phon (para análises fonéticas e fonológicas), CLAN e SALT (para aspectos morfossintáticos, gramaticais e semânticos) e Praat (para medidas acústicas). Por meio desta revisão sistemática, pode-se concluir que há vantagens no uso de software para transcrição fonética, armazenamento de amostras e análise de linguagem infantil, principalmente no que diz respeito à padronização e confiabilidade para amostras de fala espontânea. A transcrição fonética ainda depende de um transcritor humano. As ferramentas encontradas nos softwares fornecem suporte para facilitar o uso dos símbolos fonéticos, segmentação e pareamento de áudio para escrita e análises de dados de fala.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2022-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/205710.25189/rabralin.v21i2.2057Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 2 (2022); 10-31Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 2 (2022); 10-310102-715810.25189/rabralin.v21i2reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057/2696Copyright (c) 2023 Debora Tomazi Moreira Caumo, Márcio Pezzini França, Clécio Homrich da Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaumo, Débora Tomazi MoreiraFrança, Márcio PezziniHomrich da Silva, Clécio2023-05-04T19:01:50Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/2057Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2023-05-04T19:01:50Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review
Transcrição fonética da fala espontânea de crianças com auxílio de software: uma revisão sistemática
title Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review
spellingShingle Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review
Caumo, Débora Tomazi Moreira
Fonética. Linguagem Infantil. Software. Desenvolvimento da Linguagem.
Phonetics, Child Language, Software, Language Development.
title_short Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review
title_full Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review
title_fullStr Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review
title_sort Phonetic transcription of spontaneous children's speech with the aid of software: a systematic review
author Caumo, Débora Tomazi Moreira
author_facet Caumo, Débora Tomazi Moreira
França, Márcio Pezzini
Homrich da Silva, Clécio
author_role author
author2 França, Márcio Pezzini
Homrich da Silva, Clécio
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caumo, Débora Tomazi Moreira
França, Márcio Pezzini
Homrich da Silva, Clécio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fonética. Linguagem Infantil. Software. Desenvolvimento da Linguagem.
Phonetics, Child Language, Software, Language Development.
topic Fonética. Linguagem Infantil. Software. Desenvolvimento da Linguagem.
Phonetics, Child Language, Software, Language Development.
description The aim of the study was to identify, synthesize and classify the software currently available that can help in the task of phonetic transcription of the spontaneous speech of pre-school children to evaluate the development of children's language. A systematic review was performed for articles published, for the 10-year period (June 2010 to June 2020), without restrictions as to location and language, using the Cochrane, Pubmed and Web of Science databases. The terms used in the search strategies were "phonological", "phonetic", "transcription", "computer" and "software". The studies were selected by two independent reviewers using pre-defined search strategies. In the initial search, after the exclusion of duplicates, 534 articles were found. By reading their titles and abstracts, 46 articles related to the theme were left, which were then read in full. After reading, 24 articles were included in the study. The results revealed a total of seven software available for the phonetic transcription of spontaneous speech from preschoolers used for different analyses: LENA and Timestamper (for babbling and pre-linguistic vocalizations), ELAN (for gestural communication, extralinguistic elements and the situational context), Phon (for phonetic and phonological analyses), CLAN and SALT (for morphosyntactic, grammatical and semantic aspects) and Praat (for acoustic measurements). Through this systematic review, it can be concluded that there are advantages to using software for phonetic transcription, sample storage, and child language analysis, especially concerning standardization and reliability for spontaneous speech samples. Phonetic transcription still relies on the ability and subjectivity of a human transcriber. The tools found in the software provide support to facilitate using phonetic symbols, audio segmentation and pairing to writing, and analysis of speech data.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057
10.25189/rabralin.v21i2.2057
url https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057
identifier_str_mv 10.25189/rabralin.v21i2.2057
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2057/2696
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Debora Tomazi Moreira Caumo, Márcio Pezzini França, Clécio Homrich da Silva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Debora Tomazi Moreira Caumo, Márcio Pezzini França, Clécio Homrich da Silva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 2 (2022); 10-31
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 2 (2022); 10-31
0102-7158
10.25189/rabralin.v21i2
reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
collection Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org
_version_ 1798329768205090816