Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kroetz, Flávia Saldanha
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/45109
Resumo: The global human rights regime, rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, nurtures a relatively uncontroversial consensus when it comes to the core principles and ideals of individual dignity and equality that stem from International Human Rights Law. Nonetheless, despite the longstanding and well-known debate concerning universalism versus cultural relativism, there still exists a thin and rather complex line between the universality of human rights on the one hand, and the respect for local practices and traditions on the other hand. This tension is further translated into the coexistence and overlapping between the universal and the regional systems for the protection of human rights, notably because the latter reflects an attempt to strengthen the protection of basic rights while underlining regional characteristics and common values shared by certain States, as opposed to an overarching, central scheme accused of overlooking the features of each region. Against this background, this brief research explores and, ultimately, rejects the claim that regional human rights systems hinder the successful protection and promotion of human rights at the regional level and undermine the effectiveness of the United Nations system.
id UFPR-14_420b858075e5307ca3c9ccf398fe30a8
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/45109
network_acronym_str UFPR-14
network_name_str Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
repository_id_str
spelling Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversityDireito Internacional; Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanoshuman rights; universality; cultural diversity; regional systems; global systemglobal consensus and human rightsThe global human rights regime, rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, nurtures a relatively uncontroversial consensus when it comes to the core principles and ideals of individual dignity and equality that stem from International Human Rights Law. Nonetheless, despite the longstanding and well-known debate concerning universalism versus cultural relativism, there still exists a thin and rather complex line between the universality of human rights on the one hand, and the respect for local practices and traditions on the other hand. This tension is further translated into the coexistence and overlapping between the universal and the regional systems for the protection of human rights, notably because the latter reflects an attempt to strengthen the protection of basic rights while underlining regional characteristics and common values shared by certain States, as opposed to an overarching, central scheme accused of overlooking the features of each region. Against this background, this brief research explores and, ultimately, rejects the claim that regional human rights systems hinder the successful protection and promotion of human rights at the regional level and undermine the effectiveness of the United Nations system.NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPRKroetz, Flávia Saldanha2016-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/4510910.5380/rinc.v3i1.45109Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 3, n. 1 (2016): janeiro/abril; 43-58Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 3, n. 1 (2016): janeiro/abril; 43-58Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 3, n. 1 (2016): janeiro/abril; 43-582359-563910.5380/rinc.v3i1reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionaisinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/45109/27533Direitos autorais 2016 Flávia Saldanha Kroetzhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-07-25T23:56:06Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/45109Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rincPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/oairevista@ninc.com.br||2359-56392359-5639opendoar:2017-07-25T23:56:06Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversity
title Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversity
spellingShingle Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversity
Kroetz, Flávia Saldanha
Direito Internacional; Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos
human rights; universality; cultural diversity; regional systems; global system
global consensus and human rights
title_short Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversity
title_full Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversity
title_fullStr Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversity
title_full_unstemmed Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversity
title_sort Between global consensus and local deviation: a critical approach on the universality of human rights, regional human rights systems, and cultural diversity
author Kroetz, Flávia Saldanha
author_facet Kroetz, Flávia Saldanha
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kroetz, Flávia Saldanha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito Internacional; Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos
human rights; universality; cultural diversity; regional systems; global system
global consensus and human rights
topic Direito Internacional; Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos
human rights; universality; cultural diversity; regional systems; global system
global consensus and human rights
description The global human rights regime, rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, nurtures a relatively uncontroversial consensus when it comes to the core principles and ideals of individual dignity and equality that stem from International Human Rights Law. Nonetheless, despite the longstanding and well-known debate concerning universalism versus cultural relativism, there still exists a thin and rather complex line between the universality of human rights on the one hand, and the respect for local practices and traditions on the other hand. This tension is further translated into the coexistence and overlapping between the universal and the regional systems for the protection of human rights, notably because the latter reflects an attempt to strengthen the protection of basic rights while underlining regional characteristics and common values shared by certain States, as opposed to an overarching, central scheme accused of overlooking the features of each region. Against this background, this brief research explores and, ultimately, rejects the claim that regional human rights systems hinder the successful protection and promotion of human rights at the regional level and undermine the effectiveness of the United Nations system.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv


dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/45109
10.5380/rinc.v3i1.45109
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/45109
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/rinc.v3i1.45109
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/45109/27533
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Flávia Saldanha Kroetz
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Flávia Saldanha Kroetz
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 3, n. 1 (2016): janeiro/abril; 43-58
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 3, n. 1 (2016): janeiro/abril; 43-58
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 3, n. 1 (2016): janeiro/abril; 43-58
2359-5639
10.5380/rinc.v3i1
reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
collection Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ninc.com.br||
_version_ 1797174658689138688