Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/82654 |
Resumo: | Human and fundamental rights are powerful legal means to protect and promote human dignity. On the one hand, the recognition of implicit and new rights appears unavoidable and desirable as history and its evolving circumstances permanently present new challenges to human dignity. On the other hand, an artificial proliferation of rights can weaken rights’ legal and political worth. The rights system cannot expand limitless, hence criteria to test new rights must be construed in the search of adequate parameters to update the system. These criteria should reveal the presence of substantial fundamentality in rights not explicitly or formally enshrined in the constitutional text. The testing path of new rights is conceived as a discursive process which reinforces the mutual relation between rights and democracy. |
id |
UFPR-14_b55398448daf55907393eae7aad97a68 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/82654 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-14 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferationLaw; Constitutional Lawfundamental and human rights; rights system; new rights; scrutinizing criteria; substantial fundamentality; rights overreach; democracy and rightsHuman and fundamental rights are powerful legal means to protect and promote human dignity. On the one hand, the recognition of implicit and new rights appears unavoidable and desirable as history and its evolving circumstances permanently present new challenges to human dignity. On the other hand, an artificial proliferation of rights can weaken rights’ legal and political worth. The rights system cannot expand limitless, hence criteria to test new rights must be construed in the search of adequate parameters to update the system. These criteria should reveal the presence of substantial fundamentality in rights not explicitly or formally enshrined in the constitutional text. The testing path of new rights is conceived as a discursive process which reinforces the mutual relation between rights and democracy.NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPRNetto, Luisa2021-09-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/8265410.5380/rinc.v8i1.82654Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 8, n. 1 (2021): janeiro/abril; 11-75Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 8, n. 1 (2021): janeiro/abril; 11-75Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 8, n. 1 (2021): janeiro/abril; 11-752359-563910.5380/rinc.v8i1reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionaisinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/82654/44716Direitos autorais 2021 Luisa Nettohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-09-14T15:46:51Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/82654Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rincPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/oairevista@ninc.com.br||2359-56392359-5639opendoar:2021-09-14T15:46:51Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation |
title |
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation |
spellingShingle |
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation Netto, Luisa Law; Constitutional Law fundamental and human rights; rights system; new rights; scrutinizing criteria; substantial fundamentality; rights overreach; democracy and rights |
title_short |
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation |
title_full |
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation |
title_fullStr |
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation |
title_sort |
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation |
author |
Netto, Luisa |
author_facet |
Netto, Luisa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Netto, Luisa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Law; Constitutional Law fundamental and human rights; rights system; new rights; scrutinizing criteria; substantial fundamentality; rights overreach; democracy and rights |
topic |
Law; Constitutional Law fundamental and human rights; rights system; new rights; scrutinizing criteria; substantial fundamentality; rights overreach; democracy and rights |
description |
Human and fundamental rights are powerful legal means to protect and promote human dignity. On the one hand, the recognition of implicit and new rights appears unavoidable and desirable as history and its evolving circumstances permanently present new challenges to human dignity. On the other hand, an artificial proliferation of rights can weaken rights’ legal and political worth. The rights system cannot expand limitless, hence criteria to test new rights must be construed in the search of adequate parameters to update the system. These criteria should reveal the presence of substantial fundamentality in rights not explicitly or formally enshrined in the constitutional text. The testing path of new rights is conceived as a discursive process which reinforces the mutual relation between rights and democracy. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-14 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/82654 10.5380/rinc.v8i1.82654 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/82654 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5380/rinc.v8i1.82654 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/82654/44716 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Luisa Netto http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Luisa Netto http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 8, n. 1 (2021): janeiro/abril; 11-75 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 8, n. 1 (2021): janeiro/abril; 11-75 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 8, n. 1 (2021): janeiro/abril; 11-75 2359-5639 10.5380/rinc.v8i1 reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionais instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
collection |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ninc.com.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174658536046593 |