THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mariotto, Maiara
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Araújo, Laura Filomena Santos de, Bellato, Roseney, Dolina, Janderléia Valéria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/34915
Resumo: This study aimed to analyze the contrast between the discourses of the Judiciary and the Public Authority, contendersin judicial decision-making regarding the right to health of the child in a situation of chronic illness with serious malnutrition. It is adescriptive study with a qualitative approach, based on documental analysis of the judicial decision-making of the Court of Justiceof Mato Grosso, requiring the provision of nutritional intake and medications. The analysis showed that the State, in spite of itsresponsibilities to guarantee these, declines to concede them, asserting the need for management in the distribution of medications, lack of knowledge of the risk of death for the baby, and limits on the financial resources for health. The study evidences the contradiction of the discourse of the Brazilian State in the protection of its citizens, in particular the children. This contradiction shows that the State openlyfails to comply with the legislation, considering administrative issues as having priority over the well-being of vulnerable children.
id UFPR-15_7e4dbfe4cf1cd4397811109d971e3087
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/34915
network_acronym_str UFPR-15
network_name_str Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKINGDERECHO A LA SALUD EN EL DISCURSO DEL PODER JUDICIARIO Y DEL PODER PÚBLICO: ANÁLISIS DE DECISIÓN JUDICIALDIREITO À SAÚDE NO DISCURSO DO PODER JUDICIÁRIO E DO PODER PÚBLICO: ANÁLISE DE DECISÃO JUDICIALRight to health; Judicial decisions; Health institutions; Children’s health.Direito à saúde; Decisões judiciais; Instituições de saúde; Saúde da criança.Derecho a la salud; Decisiones judiciales; Instituciones de salud; Salud del niño.This study aimed to analyze the contrast between the discourses of the Judiciary and the Public Authority, contendersin judicial decision-making regarding the right to health of the child in a situation of chronic illness with serious malnutrition. It is adescriptive study with a qualitative approach, based on documental analysis of the judicial decision-making of the Court of Justiceof Mato Grosso, requiring the provision of nutritional intake and medications. The analysis showed that the State, in spite of itsresponsibilities to guarantee these, declines to concede them, asserting the need for management in the distribution of medications, lack of knowledge of the risk of death for the baby, and limits on the financial resources for health. The study evidences the contradiction of the discourse of the Brazilian State in the protection of its citizens, in particular the children. This contradiction shows that the State openlyfails to comply with the legislation, considering administrative issues as having priority over the well-being of vulnerable children.Estudio cuya finalidad fue analizar la contraposición entre los discursos del Poder Judiciario y del Poder Ejecutivo, responsables por decisión judicial acerca del derecho a la salud del niño en situación de enfermedad crónica con desnutrición grave. Se trata de estudio descriptivo de abordaje cualitativo, basado en análisis documental de decisión judicial del Tribunal de Justicia de Mato Grosso, demandando fornecimiento de insumo alimentar y medicamentos. El análisis evidenció que el Estado, a pesar de sus responsabilidades en garantizarlos, niega concederlos afirmando la necesidad de gestión en la distribución farmacéutica, el desconocimiento del riesgo de muerte del bebé y límites en los recursos financieros de la salud. El estudio evidencia la contradicción del discurso del Estado brasileño en la protección de sus ciudadanos, específicamente los niños. Esta contradicción muestra que el Estado no cumple la legislación, dando más prioridad a las cuestiones administrativas que al bienestar del niño vulnerable.Estudo objetivou analisar a contraposição entre os discursos do Poder Judiciário e do Poder Executivo, contendores em decisão judicial acerca do direito à saúde de criança em situação de adoecimento crônico com desnutrição grave. Trata-se de estudo descritivo de abordagem qualitativa, baseado em análise documental de decisão judicial do Tribunal de Justiça de Mato Grosso, demandando o fornecimento de insumo alimentar e medicamentos. A análise mostrou que o Estado, apesar de suas responsabilidades em garanti-los, nega concedê-los afirmando a necessidade de gestão na distribuição farmacêutica, o desconhecimento do risco de morte do bebê e limites nos recursos financeiros da saúde. O estudo evidencia a contradição do discurso do Estado brasileiro na proteção de seus cidadãos, especificamente as crianças. Esta contradição mostra que o Estado descumpre abertamente a legislação, considerando as questões administrativas como mais prioritárias que o bem estar de criança vulnerável. Universidade Federal do ParanáMariotto, MaiaraAraújo, Laura Filomena Santos deBellato, RoseneyDolina, Janderléia Valéria2013-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/3491510.5380/ce.v18i4.34915Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 18, n. 4 (2013)Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 18, n. 4 (2013)Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 18, n. 4 (2013)2176-91331414-853610.5380/ce.v18i4reponame:Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/34915/21669info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-12-07T20:43:29Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/34915Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/oaicogitare@ufpr.br2176-91331414-8536opendoar:2021-12-07T20:43:29Cogitare Enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING
DERECHO A LA SALUD EN EL DISCURSO DEL PODER JUDICIARIO Y DEL PODER PÚBLICO: ANÁLISIS DE DECISIÓN JUDICIAL
DIREITO À SAÚDE NO DISCURSO DO PODER JUDICIÁRIO E DO PODER PÚBLICO: ANÁLISE DE DECISÃO JUDICIAL
title THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING
spellingShingle THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING
Mariotto, Maiara
Right to health; Judicial decisions; Health institutions; Children’s health.
Direito à saúde; Decisões judiciais; Instituições de saúde; Saúde da criança.
Derecho a la salud; Decisiones judiciales; Instituciones de salud; Salud del niño.
title_short THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING
title_full THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING
title_fullStr THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING
title_full_unstemmed THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING
title_sort THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING
author Mariotto, Maiara
author_facet Mariotto, Maiara
Araújo, Laura Filomena Santos de
Bellato, Roseney
Dolina, Janderléia Valéria
author_role author
author2 Araújo, Laura Filomena Santos de
Bellato, Roseney
Dolina, Janderléia Valéria
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mariotto, Maiara
Araújo, Laura Filomena Santos de
Bellato, Roseney
Dolina, Janderléia Valéria
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv


dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Right to health; Judicial decisions; Health institutions; Children’s health.
Direito à saúde; Decisões judiciais; Instituições de saúde; Saúde da criança.
Derecho a la salud; Decisiones judiciales; Instituciones de salud; Salud del niño.
topic Right to health; Judicial decisions; Health institutions; Children’s health.
Direito à saúde; Decisões judiciais; Instituições de saúde; Saúde da criança.
Derecho a la salud; Decisiones judiciales; Instituciones de salud; Salud del niño.
description This study aimed to analyze the contrast between the discourses of the Judiciary and the Public Authority, contendersin judicial decision-making regarding the right to health of the child in a situation of chronic illness with serious malnutrition. It is adescriptive study with a qualitative approach, based on documental analysis of the judicial decision-making of the Court of Justiceof Mato Grosso, requiring the provision of nutritional intake and medications. The analysis showed that the State, in spite of itsresponsibilities to guarantee these, declines to concede them, asserting the need for management in the distribution of medications, lack of knowledge of the risk of death for the baby, and limits on the financial resources for health. The study evidences the contradiction of the discourse of the Brazilian State in the protection of its citizens, in particular the children. This contradiction shows that the State openlyfails to comply with the legislation, considering administrative issues as having priority over the well-being of vulnerable children.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv




dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/34915
10.5380/ce.v18i4.34915
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/34915
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/ce.v18i4.34915
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/34915/21669
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 18, n. 4 (2013)
Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 18, n. 4 (2013)
Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 18, n. 4 (2013)
2176-9133
1414-8536
10.5380/ce.v18i4
reponame:Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
collection Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cogitare Enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cogitare@ufpr.br
_version_ 1797068294166937600

Registros relacionados