On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Uderman, Leonardo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
Texto Completo: https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/144
Resumo: Against the interpretation that similarities between the proposals of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas make both authors representatives of a unified position, the present work seeks to demonstrate that, despite the undeniable existence of common points, there are also fundamental distinctions between their worldviews. Such disagreements are related (i) to the critique of instrumental reason in Habermas and his proposal of recovering a communicative reason, which Rawls’s theory of justice does not presuppose; and (ii) to the analytic and unhistorical justification tool proposed by the latter, which does not find place in the propositions of the former, permeated by historicity. Ultimately, despite the marked convergence between both thinkers, their conceptions are frequently in disharmony, making visible the vestiges of the very distinct intellectual traditions in which they were initiated.
id UFPR-17_5fc5630623d97c752f280be0572a4954
oai_identifier_str oai:phenomenology.com.br:article/144
network_acronym_str UFPR-17
network_name_str Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen HabermasAcerca de ciertos desacuerdos fundamentales entre John Rawls y Jürgen HabermasAcerca de alguns dissensos fundamentais entre John Rawls e Jürgen HabermasDemocraciaEsfera PúblicaJustiçaRacionalidadeDemocracyJusticePublic SphereRationalityDemocraciaEsfera PúblicaJusticiaRacionalidadAgainst the interpretation that similarities between the proposals of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas make both authors representatives of a unified position, the present work seeks to demonstrate that, despite the undeniable existence of common points, there are also fundamental distinctions between their worldviews. Such disagreements are related (i) to the critique of instrumental reason in Habermas and his proposal of recovering a communicative reason, which Rawls’s theory of justice does not presuppose; and (ii) to the analytic and unhistorical justification tool proposed by the latter, which does not find place in the propositions of the former, permeated by historicity. Ultimately, despite the marked convergence between both thinkers, their conceptions are frequently in disharmony, making visible the vestiges of the very distinct intellectual traditions in which they were initiated.En oposición a la interpretación según la que las semejanzas entre las propuestas de John Rawls e Jürgen Habermas hacen de estos dos autores representantes de una posición intelectual unificada, el presente trabajo visa argumentar que, a pesar de la innegable existencia de diversos puntos en común, hay, por otra parte, distinciones fundamentales entre sus visiones de mundo. Tales discordancias están relacionadas (i) a la crítica a la racionalidad instrumental en Habermas y su propuesta de recuperación de una racionalidad comunicativa, que la teoría de la justicia de Rawls no presupone; y (ii) a la herramienta analítica y a-histórica de justificación propuesta por este último, que no encuentra hogar en las proposiciones del primero, impregnadas de historicidad. Por último, a despecho de la nítida convergencia entre ambos, sus concepciones están muchas veces en desarmonía, tornando visibles en sus pensamientos los vestigios de las muy distintas tradiciones intelectuales en que fueran iniciados.Em oposição à interpretação segundo a qual as semelhanças entre as propostas de John Rawls e Jürgen Habermas fazem destes autores representantes de uma posição intelectual una, o presente trabalho tem por objetivo argumentar que, apesar da inegável existência de diversos pontos em comum, há, por outro lado, distinções fundamentais entre suas visões de mundo. Tais discordâncias relacionam-se (i) à crítica à racionalidade instrumental em Habermas e sua proposta de recuperação de uma racionalidade comunicativa, que a teoria da justiça de Rawls não pressupõe; e (ii) à ferramenta analítica e a-histórica de justificação proposta por este último, que não encontra espaço nas proposições do primeiro, permeadas pela historicidade. Em última análise, a despeito da nítida convergência entre ambos, suas concepções estão muitas vezes em desarmonia, tornando visíveis em seus pensamentos os resquícios das muito distintas tradições intelectuais em que foram iniciados.Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno)2023-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/144Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 105-113Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2022): Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 105-113Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; v. 3 n. 2 (2022): Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 105-1132675-4673reponame:Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciencesinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/144/107Copyright (c) 2023 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUderman, Leonardo2024-04-16T16:09:51Zoai:phenomenology.com.br:article/144Revistahttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phePUBhttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/index/oaicontato@phenomenology.com.br || aholanda@yahoo.com2675-46732675-4673opendoar:2024-04-16T16:09:51Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas
Acerca de ciertos desacuerdos fundamentales entre John Rawls y Jürgen Habermas
Acerca de alguns dissensos fundamentais entre John Rawls e Jürgen Habermas
title On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas
spellingShingle On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas
Uderman, Leonardo
Democracia
Esfera Pública
Justiça
Racionalidade
Democracy
Justice
Public Sphere
Rationality
Democracia
Esfera Pública
Justicia
Racionalidad
title_short On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas
title_full On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas
title_fullStr On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas
title_full_unstemmed On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas
title_sort On Some Fundamental Dissensions between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas
author Uderman, Leonardo
author_facet Uderman, Leonardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Uderman, Leonardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracia
Esfera Pública
Justiça
Racionalidade
Democracy
Justice
Public Sphere
Rationality
Democracia
Esfera Pública
Justicia
Racionalidad
topic Democracia
Esfera Pública
Justiça
Racionalidade
Democracy
Justice
Public Sphere
Rationality
Democracia
Esfera Pública
Justicia
Racionalidad
description Against the interpretation that similarities between the proposals of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas make both authors representatives of a unified position, the present work seeks to demonstrate that, despite the undeniable existence of common points, there are also fundamental distinctions between their worldviews. Such disagreements are related (i) to the critique of instrumental reason in Habermas and his proposal of recovering a communicative reason, which Rawls’s theory of justice does not presuppose; and (ii) to the analytic and unhistorical justification tool proposed by the latter, which does not find place in the propositions of the former, permeated by historicity. Ultimately, despite the marked convergence between both thinkers, their conceptions are frequently in disharmony, making visible the vestiges of the very distinct intellectual traditions in which they were initiated.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/144
url https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/144
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/144/107
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 105-113
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2022): Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 105-113
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; v. 3 n. 2 (2022): Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 105-113
2675-4673
reponame:Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
collection Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@phenomenology.com.br || aholanda@yahoo.com
_version_ 1796798427876556800

Registros relacionados