Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Novation |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91156 |
Resumo: | The call for the development of more responsible research and innovation has increasingly permeated European Union research and development policies. Specifically, under the auspices of approaches such as “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI) and “Open Science”, these policies conceive of the need to make innovation dynamics radically open and debatable, even with regard to the underlying preferences and expectations shaping them. Responsibility has thus been conceived in eminently anticipatory terms, that is, in terms of collectively taking care in the present of the futures enabled through innovation practices. This normative conception, which emphasises the politicisation of the ways futures are constructed through innovation and goals they are oriented towards, is nonetheless realised within a context where the prevailing way of approaching the future with regard to innovation systems is highly committed to a capitalist imperative of technological progress and economic growth. This article argues that while anticipation – understood as an interventive practice – can deploy valuable responsibilisation heuristics, their degree of disruptiveness, or openness, may depend on how such interventive practice engaging with futures deals with this techno-economic commitment, or imperative. |
id |
UFPR-18_9c54868b0f7f512943951078545609fe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/91156 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-18 |
network_name_str |
Novation |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperativeanticipation; responsible innovation; RRI; open science; anticipatory ambivalence; socio-technical futuresThe call for the development of more responsible research and innovation has increasingly permeated European Union research and development policies. Specifically, under the auspices of approaches such as “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI) and “Open Science”, these policies conceive of the need to make innovation dynamics radically open and debatable, even with regard to the underlying preferences and expectations shaping them. Responsibility has thus been conceived in eminently anticipatory terms, that is, in terms of collectively taking care in the present of the futures enabled through innovation practices. This normative conception, which emphasises the politicisation of the ways futures are constructed through innovation and goals they are oriented towards, is nonetheless realised within a context where the prevailing way of approaching the future with regard to innovation systems is highly committed to a capitalist imperative of technological progress and economic growth. This article argues that while anticipation – understood as an interventive practice – can deploy valuable responsibilisation heuristics, their degree of disruptiveness, or openness, may depend on how such interventive practice engaging with futures deals with this techno-economic commitment, or imperative.Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil)Rodríguez, HannotUrueña, SergioIbarra, Andoni2022-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresPeer Reviewedapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/9115610.5380/nocsi.v0i2.91156NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 2 (2020): Responsible Innovation (RI) in the midst of an innovation crisis; 127-146NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 2 (2020): Responsible Innovation (RI) in the midst of an innovation crisis; 127-1462562-714710.5380/nocsi.v0i2reponame:Novationinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91156/49265Copyright (c) 2023 Hannot Rodríguez, Sergio Urueña, Andoni Ibarrahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-05T15:11:31Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/91156Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/oainovation@ufpr.br2562-71472562-7147opendoar:2024-07-01T12:57:12.130356Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative |
title |
Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative |
spellingShingle |
Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative Rodríguez, Hannot anticipation; responsible innovation; RRI; open science; anticipatory ambivalence; socio-technical futures |
title_short |
Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative |
title_full |
Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative |
title_fullStr |
Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative |
title_sort |
Anticipatory responsible innovation: Futures construction in the face of the techno-economic imperative |
author |
Rodríguez, Hannot |
author_facet |
Rodríguez, Hannot Urueña, Sergio Ibarra, Andoni |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Urueña, Sergio Ibarra, Andoni |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodríguez, Hannot Urueña, Sergio Ibarra, Andoni |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
anticipation; responsible innovation; RRI; open science; anticipatory ambivalence; socio-technical futures |
topic |
anticipation; responsible innovation; RRI; open science; anticipatory ambivalence; socio-technical futures |
description |
The call for the development of more responsible research and innovation has increasingly permeated European Union research and development policies. Specifically, under the auspices of approaches such as “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI) and “Open Science”, these policies conceive of the need to make innovation dynamics radically open and debatable, even with regard to the underlying preferences and expectations shaping them. Responsibility has thus been conceived in eminently anticipatory terms, that is, in terms of collectively taking care in the present of the futures enabled through innovation practices. This normative conception, which emphasises the politicisation of the ways futures are constructed through innovation and goals they are oriented towards, is nonetheless realised within a context where the prevailing way of approaching the future with regard to innovation systems is highly committed to a capitalist imperative of technological progress and economic growth. This article argues that while anticipation – understood as an interventive practice – can deploy valuable responsibilisation heuristics, their degree of disruptiveness, or openness, may depend on how such interventive practice engaging with futures deals with this techno-economic commitment, or imperative. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares Peer Reviewed |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91156 10.5380/nocsi.v0i2.91156 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91156 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5380/nocsi.v0i2.91156 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91156/49265 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Hannot Rodríguez, Sergio Urueña, Andoni Ibarra http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Hannot Rodríguez, Sergio Urueña, Andoni Ibarra http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 2 (2020): Responsible Innovation (RI) in the midst of an innovation crisis; 127-146 NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 2 (2020): Responsible Innovation (RI) in the midst of an innovation crisis; 127-146 2562-7147 10.5380/nocsi.v0i2 reponame:Novation instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Novation |
collection |
Novation |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
novation@ufpr.br |
_version_ |
1808579137581875200 |