ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Berber, M.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Arslan, N.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399
Resumo: Commonly used real time kinematic (RTK) network (RTK Network) techniques, i.e., MAX, I-MAX, FKP and VRS, are tested by taking monthly measurements for a year in Florida. Additionally, RTCM message versions 2 and 3 are used with I-MAX and VRS measurements. The results revealed that mostly, horizontal coordinates vary a few centimeters and generally changes in vertical coordinates are less than two decimeters. In terms of horizontal coordinates, the best results are produced by I-MAX3 method and FKP yielded the worst results. In terms of vertical coordinates, almost all results look alike; however, the best results are produced by VRS3 method. It appears that I-MAX3 performed better than I-MAX2 and VRS3 performed better than VRS2. Yet, MAX did not stand out among other techniques.
id UFPR-2_dc337e6f6c58710f4fe61c048c092aa3
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/44399
network_acronym_str UFPR-2
network_name_str Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
repository_id_str
spelling ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDAGeociências; GeodésiaMaster-Auxiliary Concept, Network RTK, RTK corrections, Virtual Reference StationCommonly used real time kinematic (RTK) network (RTK Network) techniques, i.e., MAX, I-MAX, FKP and VRS, are tested by taking monthly measurements for a year in Florida. Additionally, RTCM message versions 2 and 3 are used with I-MAX and VRS measurements. The results revealed that mostly, horizontal coordinates vary a few centimeters and generally changes in vertical coordinates are less than two decimeters. In terms of horizontal coordinates, the best results are produced by I-MAX3 method and FKP yielded the worst results. In terms of vertical coordinates, almost all results look alike; however, the best results are produced by VRS3 method. It appears that I-MAX3 performed better than I-MAX2 and VRS3 performed better than VRS2. Yet, MAX did not stand out among other techniques.Boletim de Ciências GeodésicasBulletin of Geodetic SciencesBerber, M.Arslan, N.2015-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 21, No 4 (2015)Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 21, No 4 (2015)1982-21701413-4853reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicasinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399/26872info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-12-12T16:33:47Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/44399Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcgPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/oaiqdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br1982-21701413-4853opendoar:2015-12-12T16:33:47Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA
title ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA
spellingShingle ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA
Berber, M.
Geociências; Geodésia
Master-Auxiliary Concept, Network RTK, RTK corrections, Virtual Reference Station
title_short ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA
title_full ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA
title_fullStr ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA
title_full_unstemmed ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA
title_sort ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA
author Berber, M.
author_facet Berber, M.
Arslan, N.
author_role author
author2 Arslan, N.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Berber, M.
Arslan, N.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Geociências; Geodésia
Master-Auxiliary Concept, Network RTK, RTK corrections, Virtual Reference Station
topic Geociências; Geodésia
Master-Auxiliary Concept, Network RTK, RTK corrections, Virtual Reference Station
description Commonly used real time kinematic (RTK) network (RTK Network) techniques, i.e., MAX, I-MAX, FKP and VRS, are tested by taking monthly measurements for a year in Florida. Additionally, RTCM message versions 2 and 3 are used with I-MAX and VRS measurements. The results revealed that mostly, horizontal coordinates vary a few centimeters and generally changes in vertical coordinates are less than two decimeters. In terms of horizontal coordinates, the best results are produced by I-MAX3 method and FKP yielded the worst results. In terms of vertical coordinates, almost all results look alike; however, the best results are produced by VRS3 method. It appears that I-MAX3 performed better than I-MAX2 and VRS3 performed better than VRS2. Yet, MAX did not stand out among other techniques.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399/26872
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 21, No 4 (2015)
Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 21, No 4 (2015)
1982-2170
1413-4853
reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
collection Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br
_version_ 1799771718286311424