ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399 |
Resumo: | Commonly used real time kinematic (RTK) network (RTK Network) techniques, i.e., MAX, I-MAX, FKP and VRS, are tested by taking monthly measurements for a year in Florida. Additionally, RTCM message versions 2 and 3 are used with I-MAX and VRS measurements. The results revealed that mostly, horizontal coordinates vary a few centimeters and generally changes in vertical coordinates are less than two decimeters. In terms of horizontal coordinates, the best results are produced by I-MAX3 method and FKP yielded the worst results. In terms of vertical coordinates, almost all results look alike; however, the best results are produced by VRS3 method. It appears that I-MAX3 performed better than I-MAX2 and VRS3 performed better than VRS2. Yet, MAX did not stand out among other techniques. |
id |
UFPR-2_dc337e6f6c58710f4fe61c048c092aa3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/44399 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-2 |
network_name_str |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDAGeociências; GeodésiaMaster-Auxiliary Concept, Network RTK, RTK corrections, Virtual Reference StationCommonly used real time kinematic (RTK) network (RTK Network) techniques, i.e., MAX, I-MAX, FKP and VRS, are tested by taking monthly measurements for a year in Florida. Additionally, RTCM message versions 2 and 3 are used with I-MAX and VRS measurements. The results revealed that mostly, horizontal coordinates vary a few centimeters and generally changes in vertical coordinates are less than two decimeters. In terms of horizontal coordinates, the best results are produced by I-MAX3 method and FKP yielded the worst results. In terms of vertical coordinates, almost all results look alike; however, the best results are produced by VRS3 method. It appears that I-MAX3 performed better than I-MAX2 and VRS3 performed better than VRS2. Yet, MAX did not stand out among other techniques.Boletim de Ciências GeodésicasBulletin of Geodetic SciencesBerber, M.Arslan, N.2015-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 21, No 4 (2015)Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 21, No 4 (2015)1982-21701413-4853reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicasinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399/26872info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-12-12T16:33:47Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/44399Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcgPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/oaiqdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br1982-21701413-4853opendoar:2015-12-12T16:33:47Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA |
title |
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA |
spellingShingle |
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA Berber, M. Geociências; Geodésia Master-Auxiliary Concept, Network RTK, RTK corrections, Virtual Reference Station |
title_short |
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA |
title_full |
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA |
title_fullStr |
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA |
title_full_unstemmed |
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA |
title_sort |
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RTK NETWORK IN FLORIDA |
author |
Berber, M. |
author_facet |
Berber, M. Arslan, N. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Arslan, N. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Berber, M. Arslan, N. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Geociências; Geodésia Master-Auxiliary Concept, Network RTK, RTK corrections, Virtual Reference Station |
topic |
Geociências; Geodésia Master-Auxiliary Concept, Network RTK, RTK corrections, Virtual Reference Station |
description |
Commonly used real time kinematic (RTK) network (RTK Network) techniques, i.e., MAX, I-MAX, FKP and VRS, are tested by taking monthly measurements for a year in Florida. Additionally, RTCM message versions 2 and 3 are used with I-MAX and VRS measurements. The results revealed that mostly, horizontal coordinates vary a few centimeters and generally changes in vertical coordinates are less than two decimeters. In terms of horizontal coordinates, the best results are produced by I-MAX3 method and FKP yielded the worst results. In terms of vertical coordinates, almost all results look alike; however, the best results are produced by VRS3 method. It appears that I-MAX3 performed better than I-MAX2 and VRS3 performed better than VRS2. Yet, MAX did not stand out among other techniques. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-31 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/44399/26872 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 21, No 4 (2015) Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 21, No 4 (2015) 1982-2170 1413-4853 reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
collection |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br |
_version_ |
1799771718286311424 |