PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEM
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/48691 |
Resumo: | Usability issues of maps presented in-car Route Guidance and Navigation System (RGNS) may result in serious impacts on traffic safety. To obtain effective RGNS, evaluation of ‘user satisfaction’ with the system has played a prominent role, since designers can quantify drivers’ acceptance about presented information. An important variable related to design of RGNS interfaces refers to select appropriate scale for maps, since it interferes on legibility of maps. Map with good legibility may support drivers comprehend information easily and take decisions during driving task quickly. This paper evaluates drivers’ preference for scales used in maps of RGNS. A total of 52 subjects participated of an experiment performed in a parked car. Maps were designed at four different scales 1:1,000, 1:3,000, 1:6,000 and 1:10,000 for a route composed of 13 junctions. Map design was based on cartographic communication principles, such as perceptive grouping and figure-ground segregation. Based on studies cases, we conclude intermediate scales (1:6,000 and 1:3,000) were more acceptable among drivers compared to large scales (1:1,000) and small (1:10,000). RGNS should select scales for maps which supports drivers to quickly identify direction of the maneuver and, simultaneously, get information about surroundings of route. More results are presented and implications discussed |
id |
UFPR-2_fba28f96dd09857679083ece8d1bccf3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/48691 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-2 |
network_name_str |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEMUsability issues of maps presented in-car Route Guidance and Navigation System (RGNS) may result in serious impacts on traffic safety. To obtain effective RGNS, evaluation of ‘user satisfaction’ with the system has played a prominent role, since designers can quantify drivers’ acceptance about presented information. An important variable related to design of RGNS interfaces refers to select appropriate scale for maps, since it interferes on legibility of maps. Map with good legibility may support drivers comprehend information easily and take decisions during driving task quickly. This paper evaluates drivers’ preference for scales used in maps of RGNS. A total of 52 subjects participated of an experiment performed in a parked car. Maps were designed at four different scales 1:1,000, 1:3,000, 1:6,000 and 1:10,000 for a route composed of 13 junctions. Map design was based on cartographic communication principles, such as perceptive grouping and figure-ground segregation. Based on studies cases, we conclude intermediate scales (1:6,000 and 1:3,000) were more acceptable among drivers compared to large scales (1:1,000) and small (1:10,000). RGNS should select scales for maps which supports drivers to quickly identify direction of the maneuver and, simultaneously, get information about surroundings of route. More results are presented and implications discussedBoletim de Ciências GeodésicasBulletin of Geodetic SciencesRamos, Ana Paula MarquesDecanini, Mônica Modesta SantosPugliesi, Edmur AzevedoTachibana, Vilma MayumiDe Oliveira, Renan FurlanMarton Soares, Jader Mozella2016-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/48691Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 22, No 3 (2016)Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 22, No 3 (2016)1982-21701413-4853reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicasinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/48691/29286Copyright (c) 2016 Ana Paula Marques Ramos, Mônica Modesta Santos Decanini, Edmur Azevedo Pugliesi, Vilma Mayumi Tachibana, Renan Furlan De Oliveira, Jader Mozella Marton Soareshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-09-29T20:26:19Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/48691Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcgPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/oaiqdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br1982-21701413-4853opendoar:2016-09-29T20:26:19Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEM |
title |
PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEM |
spellingShingle |
PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEM Ramos, Ana Paula Marques |
title_short |
PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEM |
title_full |
PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEM |
title_fullStr |
PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEM |
title_full_unstemmed |
PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEM |
title_sort |
PREFERENCE FOR MAP SCALE OF IN-CAR ROUTE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION SYSTEM |
author |
Ramos, Ana Paula Marques |
author_facet |
Ramos, Ana Paula Marques Decanini, Mônica Modesta Santos Pugliesi, Edmur Azevedo Tachibana, Vilma Mayumi De Oliveira, Renan Furlan Marton Soares, Jader Mozella |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Decanini, Mônica Modesta Santos Pugliesi, Edmur Azevedo Tachibana, Vilma Mayumi De Oliveira, Renan Furlan Marton Soares, Jader Mozella |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramos, Ana Paula Marques Decanini, Mônica Modesta Santos Pugliesi, Edmur Azevedo Tachibana, Vilma Mayumi De Oliveira, Renan Furlan Marton Soares, Jader Mozella |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
description |
Usability issues of maps presented in-car Route Guidance and Navigation System (RGNS) may result in serious impacts on traffic safety. To obtain effective RGNS, evaluation of ‘user satisfaction’ with the system has played a prominent role, since designers can quantify drivers’ acceptance about presented information. An important variable related to design of RGNS interfaces refers to select appropriate scale for maps, since it interferes on legibility of maps. Map with good legibility may support drivers comprehend information easily and take decisions during driving task quickly. This paper evaluates drivers’ preference for scales used in maps of RGNS. A total of 52 subjects participated of an experiment performed in a parked car. Maps were designed at four different scales 1:1,000, 1:3,000, 1:6,000 and 1:10,000 for a route composed of 13 junctions. Map design was based on cartographic communication principles, such as perceptive grouping and figure-ground segregation. Based on studies cases, we conclude intermediate scales (1:6,000 and 1:3,000) were more acceptable among drivers compared to large scales (1:1,000) and small (1:10,000). RGNS should select scales for maps which supports drivers to quickly identify direction of the maneuver and, simultaneously, get information about surroundings of route. More results are presented and implications discussed |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-29 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/48691 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/48691 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/48691/29286 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 22, No 3 (2016) Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 22, No 3 (2016) 1982-2170 1413-4853 reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
collection |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br |
_version_ |
1799771719334887424 |