A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Magalhães, José Antonio Rego
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Magalhães, Juliana Neuenschwander
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/47476
Resumo: The goal of this paper is to show, mainly through the work of Walter Benjamin and Jacques Derrida, a certain ambiguity in the relation between the concepts of law and violence, and to pose it as a problem, yet the solution to this problem is not to be reached in this paper, needing to be developed elsewhere. First we will present the concept of violence as problematic, distinguishing it from other issues such as power and force. Through Benjamin, we will present the distinction between means and ends as thought by legal positivism and natural law, as well as the distinction established by the author between the violence that institutes law and the one which maintains it. We will exemplify those questions through a brief discussion of the police institution and of the “autos de resistência”. Next, we will show the reasons why Benjamin ends up condemning legal power, seeing in it a vicious circularity, in light of which it shows itself as an immediate manifestation of violence, called by the author “mythic” violence. We will end this paper with a brief suggestion about the possibility of thinking a solution to the established problem.
id UFPR-3_803356592b3b3b4f28bedfdf79d71c5d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/47476
network_acronym_str UFPR-3
network_name_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCEMÁQUINA DE MOER GENTE: O PROBLEMA DA RELAÇÃO AMBÍGUA ENTRE DIREITO E VIOLÊNCIADireito; Filosofia do direito.Jacques Derrida. Walter Benjamin. Violência. Autos de resistência.Law.Jacques Derrida. Walter Benjamin. Violence. Autos de resistência.The goal of this paper is to show, mainly through the work of Walter Benjamin and Jacques Derrida, a certain ambiguity in the relation between the concepts of law and violence, and to pose it as a problem, yet the solution to this problem is not to be reached in this paper, needing to be developed elsewhere. First we will present the concept of violence as problematic, distinguishing it from other issues such as power and force. Through Benjamin, we will present the distinction between means and ends as thought by legal positivism and natural law, as well as the distinction established by the author between the violence that institutes law and the one which maintains it. We will exemplify those questions through a brief discussion of the police institution and of the “autos de resistência”. Next, we will show the reasons why Benjamin ends up condemning legal power, seeing in it a vicious circularity, in light of which it shows itself as an immediate manifestation of violence, called by the author “mythic” violence. We will end this paper with a brief suggestion about the possibility of thinking a solution to the established problem.O objetivo deste artigo é expor, a partir principalmente da obra de Walter Benjamin e de Jacques Derrida, uma certa ambiguidade na relação entre os conceitos de direito e de violência, e colocá-la como problema, ainda que a solução desse problema não esteja no escopo deste artigo, precisando ser tratada alhures. Em primeiro lugar, apresentaremos o conceito de violência como problemático, distinguindo-o de outros como poder e força. Com base em Benjamin, apresentaremos a distinção entre meios e fins conforme pensada pelo positivismo e pelo jusnaturalismo, bem como a distinção estabelecida pelo autor entre a violência instituinte e a violência mantenedora do direito. Exemplificaremos essas questões mediante uma breve discussão da instituição policial e do instituto dos “autos de resistência”. A seguir, exporemos as razões pelas quais Benjamin acaba por condenar o poder jurídico, reconhecendo nele uma circularidade viciosa, a partir da qual esse poder se mostra como uma manifestação imediata da violência, que o autor chama de violência “mítica”. Terminaremos com uma breve sugestão quanto à possibilidade de pensar-se uma solução para o problema apresentado..Magalhães, José Antonio RegoMagalhães, Juliana Neuenschwander2016-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/4747610.5380/rfdufpr.v61i3.47476Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 61, n. 3 (2016); 299 – 3212236-72840104-331510.5380/rfdufpr.v61i3reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/47476/29836Direitos autorais 2016 Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-12-16T20:03:11Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/47476Revistahttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/direitoPUBhttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs/index.php/direito/oai||revistadireito@ufpr.br2236-72840104-3315opendoar:2016-12-16T20:03:11Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCE
MÁQUINA DE MOER GENTE: O PROBLEMA DA RELAÇÃO AMBÍGUA ENTRE DIREITO E VIOLÊNCIA
title A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCE
spellingShingle A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCE
Magalhães, José Antonio Rego
Direito; Filosofia do direito.
Jacques Derrida. Walter Benjamin. Violência. Autos de resistência.
Law.
Jacques Derrida. Walter Benjamin. Violence. Autos de resistência.
title_short A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCE
title_full A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCE
title_fullStr A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCE
title_full_unstemmed A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCE
title_sort A MACHINE FOR GRINDING PEOPLE: THE PROBLEM OF THE AMBIGUOUS RELATION BETWEEN LAW AND VIOLENCE
author Magalhães, José Antonio Rego
author_facet Magalhães, José Antonio Rego
Magalhães, Juliana Neuenschwander
author_role author
author2 Magalhães, Juliana Neuenschwander
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magalhães, José Antonio Rego
Magalhães, Juliana Neuenschwander
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito; Filosofia do direito.
Jacques Derrida. Walter Benjamin. Violência. Autos de resistência.
Law.
Jacques Derrida. Walter Benjamin. Violence. Autos de resistência.
topic Direito; Filosofia do direito.
Jacques Derrida. Walter Benjamin. Violência. Autos de resistência.
Law.
Jacques Derrida. Walter Benjamin. Violence. Autos de resistência.
description The goal of this paper is to show, mainly through the work of Walter Benjamin and Jacques Derrida, a certain ambiguity in the relation between the concepts of law and violence, and to pose it as a problem, yet the solution to this problem is not to be reached in this paper, needing to be developed elsewhere. First we will present the concept of violence as problematic, distinguishing it from other issues such as power and force. Through Benjamin, we will present the distinction between means and ends as thought by legal positivism and natural law, as well as the distinction established by the author between the violence that institutes law and the one which maintains it. We will exemplify those questions through a brief discussion of the police institution and of the “autos de resistência”. Next, we will show the reasons why Benjamin ends up condemning legal power, seeing in it a vicious circularity, in light of which it shows itself as an immediate manifestation of violence, called by the author “mythic” violence. We will end this paper with a brief suggestion about the possibility of thinking a solution to the established problem.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/47476
10.5380/rfdufpr.v61i3.47476
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/47476
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/rfdufpr.v61i3.47476
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/47476/29836
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv .
publisher.none.fl_str_mv .
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 61, n. 3 (2016); 299 – 321
2236-7284
0104-3315
10.5380/rfdufpr.v61i3
reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
collection Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireito@ufpr.br
_version_ 1799766290314821632