Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Biasoli, Luis Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Brayner de Farias, André, Borile Júnior, Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v22i1.2653
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2653
Resumo: Based on the hypothesis that modified human beings will have successful life projects, the biopolitical presuppositions of genetic manipulation in modern society are reflected. Considering the theories presented by Michel Foucault (2005), Jürgen Habermas (2010), Michael J. Sandel (2013), Hans Jonas (2006) and Achille Mbembe (2014), a genetic Africanization of the economically disadvantaged population is identified. In this scenario, concepts of class and race are confused and social prejudice increases. Faced with the new technologies of genetic engineering, gene manipulation presents itself as a new face of biopower, since science now has the power to give life from the selection of characteristics considered superior. It is argued that the criticism surrounding the process of genetic manipulation is necessary as it opens the possibility of debating mutual recognition as a condition of life, above the identification of race or class, geographic location or other characteristics of the individuals that make up society
id UFRB-4_0c5a822c675c520943cc38c4770d0c92
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2653
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
spelling Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulationBioética e eugenia: pressupostos biopolíticos da manipulação genéticaBiopolítica; Bioética; Biopoder; Eugenia; Racismo.Biopolitics; Bioethics; Biopower; Eugenics; Racism.Based on the hypothesis that modified human beings will have successful life projects, the biopolitical presuppositions of genetic manipulation in modern society are reflected. Considering the theories presented by Michel Foucault (2005), Jürgen Habermas (2010), Michael J. Sandel (2013), Hans Jonas (2006) and Achille Mbembe (2014), a genetic Africanization of the economically disadvantaged population is identified. In this scenario, concepts of class and race are confused and social prejudice increases. Faced with the new technologies of genetic engineering, gene manipulation presents itself as a new face of biopower, since science now has the power to give life from the selection of characteristics considered superior. It is argued that the criticism surrounding the process of genetic manipulation is necessary as it opens the possibility of debating mutual recognition as a condition of life, above the identification of race or class, geographic location or other characteristics of the individuals that make up societyA partir da hipótese de que seres humanos modificados terão projetos de vida bem sucedidos, reflete-se quais seriam os pressupostos biopolíticos da manipulação genética na sociedade moderna. Considerando as teorias apresentadas por Michel Foucault (2005), Jürgen Habermas (2010), Michael J. Sandel (2013), Hans Jonas (2006) e Achille Mbembe (2014), identifica-se uma africanização genética da população menos favorecida economicamente. Neste cenário, conceitos de classe e raça se confundem e ampliam o preconceito social. Diante das novas tecnologias de engenharia genética, a manipulação gênica se apresentam como uma nova face do biopoder, uma vez que a ciência, agora, tem o poder de dar vida a partir da seleção de características consideradas superiores. Sustenta-se que a crítica em torno do processo de manipulação genética é necessária, pois abre a possibilidade de se debater acerca do reconhecimento mútuo como condição de vida, acima da identificação de raça ou classe, localização geográfica ou das demais características dos indivíduos que compõem a sociedade.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2022-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/265310.31977/grirfi.v22i1.2653Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2022); 298-3072178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2653/1611Copyright (c) 2022 Luis Fernando Biasoli, André Brayner de Farias, Eduardo Borile Júniorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBiasoli, Luis FernandoBrayner de Farias, AndréBorile Júnior, Eduardo2022-02-27T22:05:01Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2653Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2022-02-27T22:05:01Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
Bioética e eugenia: pressupostos biopolíticos da manipulação genética
title Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
spellingShingle Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
Biasoli, Luis Fernando
Biopolítica; Bioética; Biopoder; Eugenia; Racismo.
Biopolitics; Bioethics; Biopower; Eugenics; Racism.
Biasoli, Luis Fernando
Biopolítica; Bioética; Biopoder; Eugenia; Racismo.
Biopolitics; Bioethics; Biopower; Eugenics; Racism.
title_short Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
title_full Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
title_fullStr Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
title_full_unstemmed Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
title_sort Bioethics and eugenics: biopolitical assumptions of genetic manipulation
author Biasoli, Luis Fernando
author_facet Biasoli, Luis Fernando
Biasoli, Luis Fernando
Brayner de Farias, André
Borile Júnior, Eduardo
Brayner de Farias, André
Borile Júnior, Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Brayner de Farias, André
Borile Júnior, Eduardo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Biasoli, Luis Fernando
Brayner de Farias, André
Borile Júnior, Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biopolítica; Bioética; Biopoder; Eugenia; Racismo.
Biopolitics; Bioethics; Biopower; Eugenics; Racism.
topic Biopolítica; Bioética; Biopoder; Eugenia; Racismo.
Biopolitics; Bioethics; Biopower; Eugenics; Racism.
description Based on the hypothesis that modified human beings will have successful life projects, the biopolitical presuppositions of genetic manipulation in modern society are reflected. Considering the theories presented by Michel Foucault (2005), Jürgen Habermas (2010), Michael J. Sandel (2013), Hans Jonas (2006) and Achille Mbembe (2014), a genetic Africanization of the economically disadvantaged population is identified. In this scenario, concepts of class and race are confused and social prejudice increases. Faced with the new technologies of genetic engineering, gene manipulation presents itself as a new face of biopower, since science now has the power to give life from the selection of characteristics considered superior. It is argued that the criticism surrounding the process of genetic manipulation is necessary as it opens the possibility of debating mutual recognition as a condition of life, above the identification of race or class, geographic location or other characteristics of the individuals that make up society
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2653
10.31977/grirfi.v22i1.2653
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2653
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v22i1.2653
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2653/1611
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Luis Fernando Biasoli, André Brayner de Farias, Eduardo Borile Júnior
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Luis Fernando Biasoli, André Brayner de Farias, Eduardo Borile Júnior
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2022); 298-307
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1822167774489739264
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v22i1.2653

Registros relacionados