Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997 |
Resumo: | The problem of thing-in-itself knowledge in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic has been traditionally faced for scholars of shopenhauerian philosophy, such as Julian Young, Paul Lauxtermann e David Cartwright. The objective of this paper is comment this one problem, but emphasizing two interpretative trends quite discussed mainly in last decade. Both trend deal with the problem of thing-in-itself from an interpretation of analogical transition Schopenhauer proposes of representation world to thing-in-itself realm. Both De Cian and Marco Segala, well as Jorge Prado, on the one hand, and Sandra Shapshay on the other, disputes about what type of knowledge, metaphoric or metonymic, this philosopher search regarding the thing-in-itself. When remaking this disputing is possible to point the distance they are of exegetic tradition that precede them; even more, to evaluate what extend they are precursory in the endeavor for specify a kind of “method”, alternative to transcendental method Kantian, from which Schopenhauer would perform his metaphysic investigation. In order to insert our interpretation between those scholars, we will focus on analysis of excerpts of Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung and Krtik der kantischen Philosophie, in which Schopenhauer detail more emphatically how must be understood his metaphysical approach. |
id |
UFRB-4_29ccd719be5f0c10ea9b01b5cd70397b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1997 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysicMetáfora, metonímia e método na transição analógica da representação à vontade: o conhecimento da coisa em si na metafísica de SchopenhauerSchopenhauer; Thing-in-itself; Analogy; Metaphor; Metonymy; Method.Schopenhauer; Analogia; Coisa em si; Metáfora; Metonímia; Método.The problem of thing-in-itself knowledge in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic has been traditionally faced for scholars of shopenhauerian philosophy, such as Julian Young, Paul Lauxtermann e David Cartwright. The objective of this paper is comment this one problem, but emphasizing two interpretative trends quite discussed mainly in last decade. Both trend deal with the problem of thing-in-itself from an interpretation of analogical transition Schopenhauer proposes of representation world to thing-in-itself realm. Both De Cian and Marco Segala, well as Jorge Prado, on the one hand, and Sandra Shapshay on the other, disputes about what type of knowledge, metaphoric or metonymic, this philosopher search regarding the thing-in-itself. When remaking this disputing is possible to point the distance they are of exegetic tradition that precede them; even more, to evaluate what extend they are precursory in the endeavor for specify a kind of “method”, alternative to transcendental method Kantian, from which Schopenhauer would perform his metaphysic investigation. In order to insert our interpretation between those scholars, we will focus on analysis of excerpts of Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung and Krtik der kantischen Philosophie, in which Schopenhauer detail more emphatically how must be understood his metaphysical approach.Este artigo tem como objetivo geral comentar o estatuto do conhecimento da coisa em si na metafísica de Schopenhauer. De modo mais específico, visa analisar como se inserem neste debate, tradicionalmente enfrentado por estudiosos da filosofia schopenhaueriana como Julian Young, Paul Lauxtermann e David Cartwright, duas correntes interpretativas bastante discutidas neste ciclo, principalmente na última década; ambas lidam com o problema da coisa em si a partir de uma interpretação da transição analógica que Schopenhauer empreende do mundo da representação para o da Vontade. Ao disputarem que tipo de conhecimento, metafórico ou metonímico, esse autor pode almejar da coisa em si, é possível apontar como De Cian e Marco Segala, bem como Jorge Prado, por um lado, e Sandra Shapshay, de outro, se distanciam da tradição exegética que lhes antecede; e, mais ainda, em que medida eles são precursores no esforço de apontar uma espécie de “método” específico, alternativo ao método transcendental kantiano, a partir do qual Schopenhauer realizaria sua empreitada metafísica. A fim de situar nossa própria interpretação entre a desses comentadores, focaremos na análise de passagens de O mundo como vontade e como representação e da Crítica da filosofia kantiana, em que Schopenhauer especifica com mais ênfase como deve ser entendida sua abordagem metafísica.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2020-10-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/199710.31977/grirfi.v20i3.1997Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 3 (2020); 362-3762178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997/1157Copyright (c) 2020 Matheus Silva Freitashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva Freitas, Matheus2020-10-20T17:50:11Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1997Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-10-20T17:50:11Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic Metáfora, metonímia e método na transição analógica da representação à vontade: o conhecimento da coisa em si na metafísica de Schopenhauer |
title |
Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic |
spellingShingle |
Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic Silva Freitas, Matheus Schopenhauer; Thing-in-itself; Analogy; Metaphor; Metonymy; Method. Schopenhauer; Analogia; Coisa em si; Metáfora; Metonímia; Método. |
title_short |
Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic |
title_full |
Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic |
title_fullStr |
Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic |
title_sort |
Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic |
author |
Silva Freitas, Matheus |
author_facet |
Silva Freitas, Matheus |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva Freitas, Matheus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Schopenhauer; Thing-in-itself; Analogy; Metaphor; Metonymy; Method. Schopenhauer; Analogia; Coisa em si; Metáfora; Metonímia; Método. |
topic |
Schopenhauer; Thing-in-itself; Analogy; Metaphor; Metonymy; Method. Schopenhauer; Analogia; Coisa em si; Metáfora; Metonímia; Método. |
description |
The problem of thing-in-itself knowledge in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic has been traditionally faced for scholars of shopenhauerian philosophy, such as Julian Young, Paul Lauxtermann e David Cartwright. The objective of this paper is comment this one problem, but emphasizing two interpretative trends quite discussed mainly in last decade. Both trend deal with the problem of thing-in-itself from an interpretation of analogical transition Schopenhauer proposes of representation world to thing-in-itself realm. Both De Cian and Marco Segala, well as Jorge Prado, on the one hand, and Sandra Shapshay on the other, disputes about what type of knowledge, metaphoric or metonymic, this philosopher search regarding the thing-in-itself. When remaking this disputing is possible to point the distance they are of exegetic tradition that precede them; even more, to evaluate what extend they are precursory in the endeavor for specify a kind of “method”, alternative to transcendental method Kantian, from which Schopenhauer would perform his metaphysic investigation. In order to insert our interpretation between those scholars, we will focus on analysis of excerpts of Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung and Krtik der kantischen Philosophie, in which Schopenhauer detail more emphatically how must be understood his metaphysical approach. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997 10.31977/grirfi.v20i3.1997 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v20i3.1997 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997/1157 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Matheus Silva Freitas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Matheus Silva Freitas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 3 (2020); 362-376 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732700081586176 |