Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva Freitas, Matheus
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997
Resumo: The problem of thing-in-itself knowledge in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic has been traditionally faced for scholars of shopenhauerian philosophy, such as Julian Young, Paul Lauxtermann e David Cartwright. The objective of this paper is comment this one problem, but emphasizing two interpretative trends quite discussed mainly in last decade. Both trend deal with the problem of thing-in-itself from an interpretation of analogical transition Schopenhauer proposes of representation world to thing-in-itself realm. Both De Cian and Marco Segala, well as Jorge Prado, on the one hand, and Sandra Shapshay on the other, disputes about what type of knowledge, metaphoric or metonymic, this philosopher search regarding the thing-in-itself. When remaking this disputing is possible to point the distance they are of exegetic tradition that precede them; even more, to evaluate what extend they are precursory in the endeavor for specify a kind of “method”, alternative to transcendental method Kantian, from which Schopenhauer would perform his metaphysic investigation. In order to insert our interpretation between those scholars, we will focus on analysis of excerpts of Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung and Krtik der kantischen Philosophie, in which Schopenhauer detail more emphatically how must be understood his metaphysical approach.
id UFRB-4_29ccd719be5f0c10ea9b01b5cd70397b
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1997
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysicMetáfora, metonímia e método na transição analógica da representação à vontade: o conhecimento da coisa em si na metafísica de SchopenhauerSchopenhauer; Thing-in-itself; Analogy; Metaphor; Metonymy; Method.Schopenhauer; Analogia; Coisa em si; Metáfora; Metonímia; Método.The problem of thing-in-itself knowledge in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic has been traditionally faced for scholars of shopenhauerian philosophy, such as Julian Young, Paul Lauxtermann e David Cartwright. The objective of this paper is comment this one problem, but emphasizing two interpretative trends quite discussed mainly in last decade. Both trend deal with the problem of thing-in-itself from an interpretation of analogical transition Schopenhauer proposes of representation world to thing-in-itself realm. Both De Cian and Marco Segala, well as Jorge Prado, on the one hand, and Sandra Shapshay on the other, disputes about what type of knowledge, metaphoric or metonymic, this philosopher search regarding the thing-in-itself. When remaking this disputing is possible to point the distance they are of exegetic tradition that precede them; even more, to evaluate what extend they are precursory in the endeavor for specify a kind of “method”, alternative to transcendental method Kantian, from which Schopenhauer would perform his metaphysic investigation. In order to insert our interpretation between those scholars, we will focus on analysis of excerpts of Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung and Krtik der kantischen Philosophie, in which Schopenhauer detail more emphatically how must be understood his metaphysical approach.Este artigo tem como objetivo geral comentar o estatuto do conhecimento da coisa em si na metafísica de Schopenhauer. De modo mais específico, visa analisar como se inserem neste debate, tradicionalmente enfrentado por estudiosos da filosofia schopenhaueriana como Julian Young, Paul Lauxtermann e David Cartwright, duas correntes interpretativas bastante discutidas neste ciclo, principalmente na última década; ambas lidam com o problema da coisa em si a partir de uma interpretação da transição analógica que Schopenhauer empreende do mundo da representação para o da Vontade. Ao disputarem que tipo de conhecimento, metafórico ou metonímico, esse autor pode almejar da coisa em si, é possível apontar como De Cian e Marco Segala, bem como Jorge Prado, por um lado, e Sandra Shapshay, de outro, se distanciam da tradição exegética que lhes antecede; e, mais ainda, em que medida eles são precursores no esforço de apontar uma espécie de “método” específico, alternativo ao método transcendental kantiano, a partir do qual Schopenhauer realizaria sua empreitada metafísica. A fim de situar nossa própria interpretação entre a desses comentadores, focaremos na análise de passagens de O mundo como vontade e como representação e da Crítica da filosofia kantiana, em que Schopenhauer especifica com mais ênfase como deve ser entendida sua abordagem metafísica.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2020-10-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/199710.31977/grirfi.v20i3.1997Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 3 (2020); 362-3762178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997/1157Copyright (c) 2020 Matheus Silva Freitashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva Freitas, Matheus2020-10-20T17:50:11Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1997Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-10-20T17:50:11Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic
Metáfora, metonímia e método na transição analógica da representação à vontade: o conhecimento da coisa em si na metafísica de Schopenhauer
title Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic
spellingShingle Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic
Silva Freitas, Matheus
Schopenhauer; Thing-in-itself; Analogy; Metaphor; Metonymy; Method.
Schopenhauer; Analogia; Coisa em si; Metáfora; Metonímia; Método.
title_short Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic
title_full Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic
title_fullStr Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic
title_full_unstemmed Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic
title_sort Metaphor, metonymy and method in analogical transition of representation to will: the knowledge of thing-in-itself in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic
author Silva Freitas, Matheus
author_facet Silva Freitas, Matheus
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva Freitas, Matheus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Schopenhauer; Thing-in-itself; Analogy; Metaphor; Metonymy; Method.
Schopenhauer; Analogia; Coisa em si; Metáfora; Metonímia; Método.
topic Schopenhauer; Thing-in-itself; Analogy; Metaphor; Metonymy; Method.
Schopenhauer; Analogia; Coisa em si; Metáfora; Metonímia; Método.
description The problem of thing-in-itself knowledge in Schopenhauer’s metaphysic has been traditionally faced for scholars of shopenhauerian philosophy, such as Julian Young, Paul Lauxtermann e David Cartwright. The objective of this paper is comment this one problem, but emphasizing two interpretative trends quite discussed mainly in last decade. Both trend deal with the problem of thing-in-itself from an interpretation of analogical transition Schopenhauer proposes of representation world to thing-in-itself realm. Both De Cian and Marco Segala, well as Jorge Prado, on the one hand, and Sandra Shapshay on the other, disputes about what type of knowledge, metaphoric or metonymic, this philosopher search regarding the thing-in-itself. When remaking this disputing is possible to point the distance they are of exegetic tradition that precede them; even more, to evaluate what extend they are precursory in the endeavor for specify a kind of “method”, alternative to transcendental method Kantian, from which Schopenhauer would perform his metaphysic investigation. In order to insert our interpretation between those scholars, we will focus on analysis of excerpts of Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung and Krtik der kantischen Philosophie, in which Schopenhauer detail more emphatically how must be understood his metaphysical approach.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997
10.31977/grirfi.v20i3.1997
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v20i3.1997
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1997/1157
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Matheus Silva Freitas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Matheus Silva Freitas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 3 (2020); 362-376
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732700081586176