Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635 |
Resumo: | Recently, the constructivist position in metaethics has attracted and inspired a number of comments, both those who share its main thesis and see it with enthusiasm, as those who see it with some skepticism. One of the important constructivist theories in this area is that of Jesse Prinz. The central thesis of the author is that if morality depends on feelings, then it is a building, and if it is a building, then it can vary across time and space. The theory of constructive emotionalism, so called Prinz relies on two key assumptions which are a basis for the other. The first idea is that the feelings are the basis for all value judgments that are made and that these values can be studied historically and anthropologically to explain why some of them persist and because others have disappeared. The second idea is that feelings create the moral, and that moral systems can be created in space and time in different ways. Thus, the problem of work to be explored in this paper is to verify to what extent the theory Prinz agrees with the main theses of other constructivist theories and this is not the case, why she does not. |
id |
UFRB-4_35916ea9860a6521007f0e7ee57603dd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/635 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?É a teoria do sentimentalismo construtivo de Jesse Prinz de fato construtivista?Construtivismo; Sentimentalismo construtivo; Jesse Prinz.Constructivism; Sentimentality constructive; Jesse PrinzRecently, the constructivist position in metaethics has attracted and inspired a number of comments, both those who share its main thesis and see it with enthusiasm, as those who see it with some skepticism. One of the important constructivist theories in this area is that of Jesse Prinz. The central thesis of the author is that if morality depends on feelings, then it is a building, and if it is a building, then it can vary across time and space. The theory of constructive emotionalism, so called Prinz relies on two key assumptions which are a basis for the other. The first idea is that the feelings are the basis for all value judgments that are made and that these values can be studied historically and anthropologically to explain why some of them persist and because others have disappeared. The second idea is that feelings create the moral, and that moral systems can be created in space and time in different ways. Thus, the problem of work to be explored in this paper is to verify to what extent the theory Prinz agrees with the main theses of other constructivist theories and this is not the case, why she does not.Recentemente, a posição construtivista em metaética tem atraído e inspirado uma série de comentários, tanto daqueles que compartilham de suas principais teses e veem-na com entusiasmo, quanto daqueles que a veem com certo ceticismo. Uma das importantes teorias construtivistas nessa área é a de Jesse Prinz. A hipótese central do autor é de que se a moralidade depende dos sentimentos, então ela é uma construção, e se ela é uma construção, então ela pode variar através do tempo e do espaço. A teoria do sentimentalismo construtivo, assim chamada por Prinz, baseia-se em duas premissas centrais, as quais são uma fundamento para a outra. A primeira ideia é de que os sentimentos são a base para todos os juízos de valor que são formulados e que estes mesmos valores podem ser estudados histórica e antropologicamente de modo a explicar porque alguns deles persistem e porque outros têm desaparecido. A segunda ideia é de que os sentimentos criam a moral, e que os sistemas morais podem ser criados espaço-temporalmente de diferentes maneiras. Assim sendo, o problema de trabalho a ser explorado nesse paper é verificar em que medida a teoria de Prinz está de acordo com as principais teses das demais teorias construtivistas e esse não for o caso, por que ela não o faz.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2015-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/63510.31977/grirfi.v11i1.635Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 1 (2015); 185-1962178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635/351Copyright (c) 2015 Lucas Mateus Dalsottoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDalsotto, Lucas Mateus2020-06-30T18:17:37Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/635Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:17:37Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive? É a teoria do sentimentalismo construtivo de Jesse Prinz de fato construtivista? |
title |
Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive? |
spellingShingle |
Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive? Dalsotto, Lucas Mateus Construtivismo; Sentimentalismo construtivo; Jesse Prinz. Constructivism; Sentimentality constructive; Jesse Prinz |
title_short |
Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive? |
title_full |
Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive? |
title_fullStr |
Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive? |
title_sort |
Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive? |
author |
Dalsotto, Lucas Mateus |
author_facet |
Dalsotto, Lucas Mateus |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dalsotto, Lucas Mateus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Construtivismo; Sentimentalismo construtivo; Jesse Prinz. Constructivism; Sentimentality constructive; Jesse Prinz |
topic |
Construtivismo; Sentimentalismo construtivo; Jesse Prinz. Constructivism; Sentimentality constructive; Jesse Prinz |
description |
Recently, the constructivist position in metaethics has attracted and inspired a number of comments, both those who share its main thesis and see it with enthusiasm, as those who see it with some skepticism. One of the important constructivist theories in this area is that of Jesse Prinz. The central thesis of the author is that if morality depends on feelings, then it is a building, and if it is a building, then it can vary across time and space. The theory of constructive emotionalism, so called Prinz relies on two key assumptions which are a basis for the other. The first idea is that the feelings are the basis for all value judgments that are made and that these values can be studied historically and anthropologically to explain why some of them persist and because others have disappeared. The second idea is that feelings create the moral, and that moral systems can be created in space and time in different ways. Thus, the problem of work to be explored in this paper is to verify to what extent the theory Prinz agrees with the main theses of other constructivist theories and this is not the case, why she does not. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635 10.31977/grirfi.v11i1.635 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v11i1.635 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635/351 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Lucas Mateus Dalsotto info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Lucas Mateus Dalsotto |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 1 (2015); 185-196 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732698599948288 |