Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dalsotto, Lucas Mateus
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635
Resumo: Recently, the constructivist position in metaethics has attracted and inspired a number of comments, both those who share its main thesis and see it with enthusiasm, as those who see it with some skepticism. One of the important constructivist theories in this area is that of Jesse Prinz. The central thesis of the author is that if morality depends on feelings, then it is a building, and if it is a building, then it can vary across time and space. The theory of constructive emotionalism, so called Prinz relies on two key assumptions which are a basis for the other. The first idea is that the feelings are the basis for all value judgments that are made ​​and that these values ​​can be studied historically and anthropologically to explain why some of them persist and because others have disappeared. The second idea is that feelings create the moral, and that moral systems can be created in space and time in different ways. Thus, the problem of work to be explored in this paper is to verify to what extent the theory Prinz agrees with the main theses of other constructivist theories and this is not the case, why she does not.
id UFRB-4_35916ea9860a6521007f0e7ee57603dd
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/635
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?É a teoria do sentimentalismo construtivo de Jesse Prinz de fato construtivista?Construtivismo; Sentimentalismo construtivo; Jesse Prinz.Constructivism; Sentimentality constructive; Jesse PrinzRecently, the constructivist position in metaethics has attracted and inspired a number of comments, both those who share its main thesis and see it with enthusiasm, as those who see it with some skepticism. One of the important constructivist theories in this area is that of Jesse Prinz. The central thesis of the author is that if morality depends on feelings, then it is a building, and if it is a building, then it can vary across time and space. The theory of constructive emotionalism, so called Prinz relies on two key assumptions which are a basis for the other. The first idea is that the feelings are the basis for all value judgments that are made ​​and that these values ​​can be studied historically and anthropologically to explain why some of them persist and because others have disappeared. The second idea is that feelings create the moral, and that moral systems can be created in space and time in different ways. Thus, the problem of work to be explored in this paper is to verify to what extent the theory Prinz agrees with the main theses of other constructivist theories and this is not the case, why she does not.Recentemente, a posição construtivista em metaética tem atraído e inspirado uma série de comentários, tanto daqueles que compartilham de suas principais teses e veem-na com entusiasmo, quanto daqueles que a veem com certo ceticismo. Uma das importantes teorias construtivistas nessa área é a de Jesse Prinz. A hipótese central do autor é de que se a moralidade depende dos sentimentos, então ela é uma construção, e se ela é uma construção, então ela pode variar através do tempo e do espaço. A teoria do sentimentalismo construtivo, assim chamada por Prinz, baseia-se em duas premissas centrais, as quais são uma fundamento para a outra. A primeira ideia é de que os sentimentos são a base para todos os juízos de valor que são formulados e que estes mesmos valores podem ser estudados histórica e antropologicamente de modo a explicar porque alguns deles persistem e porque outros têm desaparecido. A segunda ideia é de que os sentimentos criam a moral, e que os sistemas morais podem ser criados espaço-temporalmente de diferentes maneiras. Assim sendo, o problema de trabalho a ser explorado nesse paper é verificar em que medida a teoria de Prinz está de acordo com as principais teses das demais teorias construtivistas e esse não for o caso, por que ela não o faz.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2015-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/63510.31977/grirfi.v11i1.635Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 1 (2015); 185-1962178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635/351Copyright (c) 2015 Lucas Mateus Dalsottoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDalsotto, Lucas Mateus2020-06-30T18:17:37Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/635Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:17:37Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?
É a teoria do sentimentalismo construtivo de Jesse Prinz de fato construtivista?
title Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?
spellingShingle Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?
Dalsotto, Lucas Mateus
Construtivismo; Sentimentalismo construtivo; Jesse Prinz.
Constructivism; Sentimentality constructive; Jesse Prinz
title_short Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?
title_full Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?
title_fullStr Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?
title_full_unstemmed Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?
title_sort Is Jesse Prinz's theory of constructive sentimentalism really constructive?
author Dalsotto, Lucas Mateus
author_facet Dalsotto, Lucas Mateus
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dalsotto, Lucas Mateus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Construtivismo; Sentimentalismo construtivo; Jesse Prinz.
Constructivism; Sentimentality constructive; Jesse Prinz
topic Construtivismo; Sentimentalismo construtivo; Jesse Prinz.
Constructivism; Sentimentality constructive; Jesse Prinz
description Recently, the constructivist position in metaethics has attracted and inspired a number of comments, both those who share its main thesis and see it with enthusiasm, as those who see it with some skepticism. One of the important constructivist theories in this area is that of Jesse Prinz. The central thesis of the author is that if morality depends on feelings, then it is a building, and if it is a building, then it can vary across time and space. The theory of constructive emotionalism, so called Prinz relies on two key assumptions which are a basis for the other. The first idea is that the feelings are the basis for all value judgments that are made ​​and that these values ​​can be studied historically and anthropologically to explain why some of them persist and because others have disappeared. The second idea is that feelings create the moral, and that moral systems can be created in space and time in different ways. Thus, the problem of work to be explored in this paper is to verify to what extent the theory Prinz agrees with the main theses of other constructivist theories and this is not the case, why she does not.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635
10.31977/grirfi.v11i1.635
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v11i1.635
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/635/351
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Lucas Mateus Dalsotto
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Lucas Mateus Dalsotto
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 1 (2015); 185-196
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732698599948288