Russell’s propositional analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1794 |
Resumo: | The present paper explains what Russell’s method of logical analysis is and how it works in the context of logical atomism, pointing out the objectives and precepts that he considers when he analyzes propositions. After exploring the general development of analysis in his work, I examine two examples of propositional analysis: that of relational propositions and that of propositions which contain descriptions. In both cases, I have noted that Russell seeks to break with a logic which was restricted to the subject-predicate form, once he thought it was the origin of a defective grammar and, thus, also of many of the traditional metaphysical problems. In this sense, assuming that there may be a wide variety of forms, he says that the objective of the analysis would be precisely to identify what is the logical form and what are the constituents of a proposition, which would serve to bring in evidence the misunderstandings of language and so to dissolve metaphysical problems. Therefore, in the present paper, I detail under which theoretical precepts Russell accomplishes this goal in the two specified examples. |
id |
UFRB-4_506309e9a9e1ff7e41c36aea63fadeb2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1794 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Russell’s propositional analysisRussell e a análise proposicionalRussell; Atomismo lógico; Análise proposicional.Russell; Logical atomism; Propositional analysis.The present paper explains what Russell’s method of logical analysis is and how it works in the context of logical atomism, pointing out the objectives and precepts that he considers when he analyzes propositions. After exploring the general development of analysis in his work, I examine two examples of propositional analysis: that of relational propositions and that of propositions which contain descriptions. In both cases, I have noted that Russell seeks to break with a logic which was restricted to the subject-predicate form, once he thought it was the origin of a defective grammar and, thus, also of many of the traditional metaphysical problems. In this sense, assuming that there may be a wide variety of forms, he says that the objective of the analysis would be precisely to identify what is the logical form and what are the constituents of a proposition, which would serve to bring in evidence the misunderstandings of language and so to dissolve metaphysical problems. Therefore, in the present paper, I detail under which theoretical precepts Russell accomplishes this goal in the two specified examples.O presente artigo explica o que é e como funciona o método de análise lógica de Russell no contexto do atomismo lógico, apontando os objetivos e preceitos que ele leva em conta quando se propõe a fazer análises proposicionais. Após explorar o desenvolvimento geral da análise em sua obra, examinamos dois exemplos de análise proposicional: o de proposições relacionais e o de proposições que contêm descrições. Nos dois casos, notamos que Russell busca romper com uma lógica restrita à forma sujeito-predicado, que ele pensava ser a origem de uma gramática defectiva e, por isso, também de muitos dos problemas metafísicos tradicionais. Neste sentido, presumindo que pode haver uma ampla variedade de formas, Russell pensa que o objetivo da análise seria justamente identificar qual é a forma lógica e quais são os constituintes de uma proposição, o que serviria para desfazer mal-entendidos da linguagem e dissolver problemas metafísicos. Portanto, no presente artigo, detalhamos sob quais preceitos teóricos Russell realiza esse objetivo nos dois exemplos especificados.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2020-06-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/179410.31977/grirfi.v20i2.1794Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (2020); 258-2802178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1794/1049Copyright (c) 2020 Murilo Garcia de Matos Amaralhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAmaral, Murilo Garcia de Matos2020-08-07T21:46:06Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1794Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-08-07T21:46:06Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Russell’s propositional analysis Russell e a análise proposicional |
title |
Russell’s propositional analysis |
spellingShingle |
Russell’s propositional analysis Amaral, Murilo Garcia de Matos Russell; Atomismo lógico; Análise proposicional. Russell; Logical atomism; Propositional analysis. |
title_short |
Russell’s propositional analysis |
title_full |
Russell’s propositional analysis |
title_fullStr |
Russell’s propositional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Russell’s propositional analysis |
title_sort |
Russell’s propositional analysis |
author |
Amaral, Murilo Garcia de Matos |
author_facet |
Amaral, Murilo Garcia de Matos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Amaral, Murilo Garcia de Matos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Russell; Atomismo lógico; Análise proposicional. Russell; Logical atomism; Propositional analysis. |
topic |
Russell; Atomismo lógico; Análise proposicional. Russell; Logical atomism; Propositional analysis. |
description |
The present paper explains what Russell’s method of logical analysis is and how it works in the context of logical atomism, pointing out the objectives and precepts that he considers when he analyzes propositions. After exploring the general development of analysis in his work, I examine two examples of propositional analysis: that of relational propositions and that of propositions which contain descriptions. In both cases, I have noted that Russell seeks to break with a logic which was restricted to the subject-predicate form, once he thought it was the origin of a defective grammar and, thus, also of many of the traditional metaphysical problems. In this sense, assuming that there may be a wide variety of forms, he says that the objective of the analysis would be precisely to identify what is the logical form and what are the constituents of a proposition, which would serve to bring in evidence the misunderstandings of language and so to dissolve metaphysical problems. Therefore, in the present paper, I detail under which theoretical precepts Russell accomplishes this goal in the two specified examples. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1794 10.31977/grirfi.v20i2.1794 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1794 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v20i2.1794 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1794/1049 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Murilo Garcia de Matos Amaral http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Murilo Garcia de Matos Amaral http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (2020); 258-280 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732700013428736 |