Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2540 |
Resumo: | The article assumes that the philosophers known as “pre-Socratics” should be understood for analyzing their fragments and for a critical analysis of the testimonies about them that have come to us. The Aristotelian reading prevailed, but today we are able to understand the Ionian philosophy in its particularity, each of its philosophers and the ideas common to them. We approach these philosophers together as members of a historical tradition, as this undoubtedly seems unavoidable for their proper understanding, and we pay attention to the fundamental notions of necessity, evolution and freedom, a kind of backbone of Anaximander's thought to that of Lucretius. Especially in contrast to the idea of final cause (basilar for Aristotle, but also for Plato), we consider that the Ionians followed the opposite path to the Aristotelian and that the Epicureans are their main heirs, hence the expression “Ionian-Epicurean philosophy”, for us created to designate what we believe to have been a long and legitimate philosophical tradition. |
id |
UFRB-4_79dfe2be9bd1f380be1f3a1baf7dac33 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2540 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophyNecessidade, evolução e liberdade na filosofia jônico-epicuristaNecessity; Evolution; Freedom; Ionian; Epicurism. Necessidade; Evolução; Liberdade; Jônicos; Epicurismo.The article assumes that the philosophers known as “pre-Socratics” should be understood for analyzing their fragments and for a critical analysis of the testimonies about them that have come to us. The Aristotelian reading prevailed, but today we are able to understand the Ionian philosophy in its particularity, each of its philosophers and the ideas common to them. We approach these philosophers together as members of a historical tradition, as this undoubtedly seems unavoidable for their proper understanding, and we pay attention to the fundamental notions of necessity, evolution and freedom, a kind of backbone of Anaximander's thought to that of Lucretius. Especially in contrast to the idea of final cause (basilar for Aristotle, but also for Plato), we consider that the Ionians followed the opposite path to the Aristotelian and that the Epicureans are their main heirs, hence the expression “Ionian-Epicurean philosophy”, for us created to designate what we believe to have been a long and legitimate philosophical tradition.O artigo parte do princípio de que os filósofos chamados “pré-socráticos” devem ser conhecidos pela análise de seus fragmentos e por uma análise crítica dos testemunhos que sobre eles nos chegaram. A leitura aristotélica prevaleceu, porém hoje temos condições de entender a filosofia jônica em sua particularidade, cada um dos filósofos e o que é comum a eles. Abordamos esses filósofos em seu conjunto como membros de uma tradição histórica, pois isto sem dúvida nos parece incontornável para a sua adequada compreensão, e nos ativemos às noções fundamentais de necessidade, evolução e liberdade, uma espécie de espinha dorsal do pensamento de Anaximandro ao de Lucrécio. Especialmente em contraste com a ideia de finalidade (basilar para Aristóteles, mas também para Platão), consideramos que os jônicos seguiram o caminho oposto ao aristotélico e que os epicuristas são seus principais herdeiros, daí a expressão “filosofia jônico-epicurista”, por nós cunhada para se referir ao que acreditamos ter sido uma longa e legítima tradição filosófica.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2022-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/254010.31977/grirfi.v22i1.2540Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2022); 49-582178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2540/1592Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Estrela Cantohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCanto, Rafael Estrela2022-02-27T22:05:21Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2540Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2022-02-27T22:05:21Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophy Necessidade, evolução e liberdade na filosofia jônico-epicurista |
title |
Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophy |
spellingShingle |
Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophy Canto, Rafael Estrela Necessity; Evolution; Freedom; Ionian; Epicurism. Necessidade; Evolução; Liberdade; Jônicos; Epicurismo. |
title_short |
Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophy |
title_full |
Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophy |
title_fullStr |
Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophy |
title_sort |
Necessity, evolution and freedom in the ionian-epicurist philosophy |
author |
Canto, Rafael Estrela |
author_facet |
Canto, Rafael Estrela |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Canto, Rafael Estrela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Necessity; Evolution; Freedom; Ionian; Epicurism. Necessidade; Evolução; Liberdade; Jônicos; Epicurismo. |
topic |
Necessity; Evolution; Freedom; Ionian; Epicurism. Necessidade; Evolução; Liberdade; Jônicos; Epicurismo. |
description |
The article assumes that the philosophers known as “pre-Socratics” should be understood for analyzing their fragments and for a critical analysis of the testimonies about them that have come to us. The Aristotelian reading prevailed, but today we are able to understand the Ionian philosophy in its particularity, each of its philosophers and the ideas common to them. We approach these philosophers together as members of a historical tradition, as this undoubtedly seems unavoidable for their proper understanding, and we pay attention to the fundamental notions of necessity, evolution and freedom, a kind of backbone of Anaximander's thought to that of Lucretius. Especially in contrast to the idea of final cause (basilar for Aristotle, but also for Plato), we consider that the Ionians followed the opposite path to the Aristotelian and that the Epicureans are their main heirs, hence the expression “Ionian-Epicurean philosophy”, for us created to designate what we believe to have been a long and legitimate philosophical tradition. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2540 10.31977/grirfi.v22i1.2540 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2540 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v22i1.2540 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2540/1592 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Estrela Canto http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Estrela Canto http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2022); 49-58 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732700521988096 |