Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Avalone, Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929
Resumo: The relationship between nature and history is of paramount importance in the development of Heidegger's thought. The philosopher reserved a different way of interrogating nature in relation to the way of interrogating the historical being-there. In fact, the author of Being and Time captured a fundamental aspect with regard to the consequences of the way nature is considered in our time. Considering that Heidegger affirmed that “nature is an entity that meets within the world and that can be discovered, following different paths and degrees”, his indication that the current (hegemonic) conception of nature is characterized by being “undifferentiated” proves to be extremely relevant to the understanding of the topic in focus. In this sense, the present work aims to discuss the Heideggerian critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature from the concept of unterschied and the dialogue with its critics, seeking to explain the philosopher's intention of no longer thinking about the relationship between nature and history separately, but in its unity in the ontological understanding, which would occur each time according to the modalities from which the historical being-there appropriates its having-been, its traditionally inherited possibility-of-existence.
id UFRB-4_7fa171ca1cfbcf83984348a2d1e29b85
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2929
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of natureUnterschied: sobre a crítica de Heidegger à concepção indiferenciada de naturezaHeidegger; Natureza; Unterschied.Heidegger; Nature; Unterschied.The relationship between nature and history is of paramount importance in the development of Heidegger's thought. The philosopher reserved a different way of interrogating nature in relation to the way of interrogating the historical being-there. In fact, the author of Being and Time captured a fundamental aspect with regard to the consequences of the way nature is considered in our time. Considering that Heidegger affirmed that “nature is an entity that meets within the world and that can be discovered, following different paths and degrees”, his indication that the current (hegemonic) conception of nature is characterized by being “undifferentiated” proves to be extremely relevant to the understanding of the topic in focus. In this sense, the present work aims to discuss the Heideggerian critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature from the concept of unterschied and the dialogue with its critics, seeking to explain the philosopher's intention of no longer thinking about the relationship between nature and history separately, but in its unity in the ontological understanding, which would occur each time according to the modalities from which the historical being-there appropriates its having-been, its traditionally inherited possibility-of-existence.A relação entre natureza e história é de suma importância no desenvolvimento do pensamento de Heidegger. O filósofo reservou um modo distinto de interrogação da natureza em relação ao modo de interrogar o ser-aí histórico. De fato, o autor de Ser e tempo captou um aspecto fundamental no que diz respeito às consequências do modo como a natureza é considerada em nossa época. Tendo em vista que Heidegger afirmou ser a “natureza um ente que vem ao encontro dentro do mundo e que pode ser descoberto, seguindo-se caminhos e graus diferentes”, sua indicação de que a concepção atual (hegemônica) de natureza caracteriza-se por ser “indiferenciada” se mostra extremamente relevante para a compreensão do tema em foco. Nesse sentido, o presente artigo tem como propósito discutir a crítica heideggeriana da concepção indiferenciada de natureza a partir do conceito de unterschied e do diálogo com seus críticos, buscando explicitar o intuito do filósofo de não mais pensar a relação entre natureza e história separadamente, mas em sua unidade na compreensão ontológica, que se daria a cada vez segundo as modalidades a partir das quais o ser-aí histórico se apropria do seu tendo-sido, sua possibilidade-de-existência tradicionalmente herdada.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2022-10-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/292910.31977/grirfi.v22i3.2929Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 3 (2022); 33-442178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929/1781Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Avalonehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAvalone, Ricardo2022-10-28T21:38:12Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2929Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2022-10-28T21:38:12Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature
Unterschied: sobre a crítica de Heidegger à concepção indiferenciada de natureza
title Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature
spellingShingle Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature
Avalone, Ricardo
Heidegger; Natureza; Unterschied.
Heidegger; Nature; Unterschied.
title_short Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature
title_full Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature
title_fullStr Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature
title_full_unstemmed Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature
title_sort Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature
author Avalone, Ricardo
author_facet Avalone, Ricardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Avalone, Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Heidegger; Natureza; Unterschied.
Heidegger; Nature; Unterschied.
topic Heidegger; Natureza; Unterschied.
Heidegger; Nature; Unterschied.
description The relationship between nature and history is of paramount importance in the development of Heidegger's thought. The philosopher reserved a different way of interrogating nature in relation to the way of interrogating the historical being-there. In fact, the author of Being and Time captured a fundamental aspect with regard to the consequences of the way nature is considered in our time. Considering that Heidegger affirmed that “nature is an entity that meets within the world and that can be discovered, following different paths and degrees”, his indication that the current (hegemonic) conception of nature is characterized by being “undifferentiated” proves to be extremely relevant to the understanding of the topic in focus. In this sense, the present work aims to discuss the Heideggerian critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature from the concept of unterschied and the dialogue with its critics, seeking to explain the philosopher's intention of no longer thinking about the relationship between nature and history separately, but in its unity in the ontological understanding, which would occur each time according to the modalities from which the historical being-there appropriates its having-been, its traditionally inherited possibility-of-existence.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929
10.31977/grirfi.v22i3.2929
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v22i3.2929
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929/1781
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Avalone
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Avalone
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 3 (2022); 33-44
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732700733800448