Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929 |
Resumo: | The relationship between nature and history is of paramount importance in the development of Heidegger's thought. The philosopher reserved a different way of interrogating nature in relation to the way of interrogating the historical being-there. In fact, the author of Being and Time captured a fundamental aspect with regard to the consequences of the way nature is considered in our time. Considering that Heidegger affirmed that “nature is an entity that meets within the world and that can be discovered, following different paths and degrees”, his indication that the current (hegemonic) conception of nature is characterized by being “undifferentiated” proves to be extremely relevant to the understanding of the topic in focus. In this sense, the present work aims to discuss the Heideggerian critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature from the concept of unterschied and the dialogue with its critics, seeking to explain the philosopher's intention of no longer thinking about the relationship between nature and history separately, but in its unity in the ontological understanding, which would occur each time according to the modalities from which the historical being-there appropriates its having-been, its traditionally inherited possibility-of-existence. |
id |
UFRB-4_7fa171ca1cfbcf83984348a2d1e29b85 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2929 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of natureUnterschied: sobre a crítica de Heidegger à concepção indiferenciada de naturezaHeidegger; Natureza; Unterschied.Heidegger; Nature; Unterschied.The relationship between nature and history is of paramount importance in the development of Heidegger's thought. The philosopher reserved a different way of interrogating nature in relation to the way of interrogating the historical being-there. In fact, the author of Being and Time captured a fundamental aspect with regard to the consequences of the way nature is considered in our time. Considering that Heidegger affirmed that “nature is an entity that meets within the world and that can be discovered, following different paths and degrees”, his indication that the current (hegemonic) conception of nature is characterized by being “undifferentiated” proves to be extremely relevant to the understanding of the topic in focus. In this sense, the present work aims to discuss the Heideggerian critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature from the concept of unterschied and the dialogue with its critics, seeking to explain the philosopher's intention of no longer thinking about the relationship between nature and history separately, but in its unity in the ontological understanding, which would occur each time according to the modalities from which the historical being-there appropriates its having-been, its traditionally inherited possibility-of-existence.A relação entre natureza e história é de suma importância no desenvolvimento do pensamento de Heidegger. O filósofo reservou um modo distinto de interrogação da natureza em relação ao modo de interrogar o ser-aí histórico. De fato, o autor de Ser e tempo captou um aspecto fundamental no que diz respeito às consequências do modo como a natureza é considerada em nossa época. Tendo em vista que Heidegger afirmou ser a “natureza um ente que vem ao encontro dentro do mundo e que pode ser descoberto, seguindo-se caminhos e graus diferentes”, sua indicação de que a concepção atual (hegemônica) de natureza caracteriza-se por ser “indiferenciada” se mostra extremamente relevante para a compreensão do tema em foco. Nesse sentido, o presente artigo tem como propósito discutir a crítica heideggeriana da concepção indiferenciada de natureza a partir do conceito de unterschied e do diálogo com seus críticos, buscando explicitar o intuito do filósofo de não mais pensar a relação entre natureza e história separadamente, mas em sua unidade na compreensão ontológica, que se daria a cada vez segundo as modalidades a partir das quais o ser-aí histórico se apropria do seu tendo-sido, sua possibilidade-de-existência tradicionalmente herdada.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2022-10-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/292910.31977/grirfi.v22i3.2929Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 3 (2022); 33-442178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929/1781Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Avalonehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAvalone, Ricardo2022-10-28T21:38:12Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2929Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2022-10-28T21:38:12Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature Unterschied: sobre a crítica de Heidegger à concepção indiferenciada de natureza |
title |
Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature |
spellingShingle |
Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature Avalone, Ricardo Heidegger; Natureza; Unterschied. Heidegger; Nature; Unterschied. |
title_short |
Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature |
title_full |
Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature |
title_fullStr |
Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature |
title_sort |
Unterschied: on the Heidegger’s critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature |
author |
Avalone, Ricardo |
author_facet |
Avalone, Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Avalone, Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Heidegger; Natureza; Unterschied. Heidegger; Nature; Unterschied. |
topic |
Heidegger; Natureza; Unterschied. Heidegger; Nature; Unterschied. |
description |
The relationship between nature and history is of paramount importance in the development of Heidegger's thought. The philosopher reserved a different way of interrogating nature in relation to the way of interrogating the historical being-there. In fact, the author of Being and Time captured a fundamental aspect with regard to the consequences of the way nature is considered in our time. Considering that Heidegger affirmed that “nature is an entity that meets within the world and that can be discovered, following different paths and degrees”, his indication that the current (hegemonic) conception of nature is characterized by being “undifferentiated” proves to be extremely relevant to the understanding of the topic in focus. In this sense, the present work aims to discuss the Heideggerian critique of the undifferentiated conception of nature from the concept of unterschied and the dialogue with its critics, seeking to explain the philosopher's intention of no longer thinking about the relationship between nature and history separately, but in its unity in the ontological understanding, which would occur each time according to the modalities from which the historical being-there appropriates its having-been, its traditionally inherited possibility-of-existence. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929 10.31977/grirfi.v22i3.2929 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v22i3.2929 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2929/1781 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Avalone http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Avalone http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 3 (2022); 33-44 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732700733800448 |