Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to Husserl
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/716 |
Resumo: | The transcendental idealism announced by Husserl as identical to phenomenology itself was one of the most controversial points of his philosophy. In this respect, one of the first critics of the philosophical position espoused openly by Husserl since Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology was his old student Roman Ingarden. Its dense and resolute criticism in relation to Husserl’s idealistic perspective is supported by deep ontological investigations, contained mainly in his magnum opus, Controversy over the Existence of the World. However, some of the discussions displayed there were already present in his famous writing The Literary Work of Art, from 1929. Indeed, in this text, which seeks to demarcate the ontological status of literary works, Ingarden already undertakes analyses that allow him to question some of the central assumptions of the transcendental idealism advocated by Husserl. The proposal of this work is to present some of the basic notions of Ingarden’s ontology, as well as his views on the mode of being of literary work, and try to understand how these elements coordinate in order to provide to Ingarden some elements that allow him to attempt a realistic response to Husserl’s position. |
id |
UFRB-4_9b1d3c0ea6a29789e92cf38ea92f5231 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/716 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to HusserlOntologia e obra literária: a resposta realista de Ingarden a HusserlIdealismo; Realismo; Ontologia; Obra literária; Ingarden.Idealism; Realism; Ontology; Literary work; IngardenThe transcendental idealism announced by Husserl as identical to phenomenology itself was one of the most controversial points of his philosophy. In this respect, one of the first critics of the philosophical position espoused openly by Husserl since Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology was his old student Roman Ingarden. Its dense and resolute criticism in relation to Husserl’s idealistic perspective is supported by deep ontological investigations, contained mainly in his magnum opus, Controversy over the Existence of the World. However, some of the discussions displayed there were already present in his famous writing The Literary Work of Art, from 1929. Indeed, in this text, which seeks to demarcate the ontological status of literary works, Ingarden already undertakes analyses that allow him to question some of the central assumptions of the transcendental idealism advocated by Husserl. The proposal of this work is to present some of the basic notions of Ingarden’s ontology, as well as his views on the mode of being of literary work, and try to understand how these elements coordinate in order to provide to Ingarden some elements that allow him to attempt a realistic response to Husserl’s position. O idealismo transcendental anunciado por Husserl como idêntico à própria fenomenologia nunca deixou de ser um dos pontos mais polêmicos de sua filosofia. A esse respeito, um dos primeiros críticos da posição filosófica esposada publicamente por Husserl a partir de Ideias para uma fenomenologia pura foi seu outrora aluno Roman Ingarden. Seu denso e resoluto criticismo em relação à perspectiva idealista de Husserl é amparado por minuciosas investigações de ordem ontológica, contidas sobretudo em seu magnum opus, Controvérsia acerca da existência do mundo. Contudo, algumas das discussões aí indicadas já se faziam presentes em seu famoso escrito A obra de arte literária, de 1929. Com efeito, neste texto, que busca demarcar o estatuto ontológico das obras literárias, Ingarden já empreende análises que lhe permitem questionar alguns dos pressupostos centrais ao idealismo transcendental advogado por Husserl. A proposta do presente trabalho é apresentar algumas das noções básicas da ontologia ingardeniana, bem como sua visão acerca do modo de ser da obra literária, e tentar compreender como estes elementos se coordenam a fim de fornecer a Ingarden alguns dos elementos que lhe permitem ensaiar uma resposta realista à perspectiva de Husserl.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2016-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/71610.31977/grirfi.v14i2.716Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2016); 219-2432178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/716/432Copyright (c) 2016 Allan J. Vieirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVieira, Allan J.2020-06-30T18:16:13Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/716Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:16:13Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to Husserl Ontologia e obra literária: a resposta realista de Ingarden a Husserl |
title |
Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to Husserl |
spellingShingle |
Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to Husserl Vieira, Allan J. Idealismo; Realismo; Ontologia; Obra literária; Ingarden. Idealism; Realism; Ontology; Literary work; Ingarden |
title_short |
Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to Husserl |
title_full |
Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to Husserl |
title_fullStr |
Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to Husserl |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to Husserl |
title_sort |
Ontology and the literary work: the realistic Ingarden’s response to Husserl |
author |
Vieira, Allan J. |
author_facet |
Vieira, Allan J. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vieira, Allan J. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Idealismo; Realismo; Ontologia; Obra literária; Ingarden. Idealism; Realism; Ontology; Literary work; Ingarden |
topic |
Idealismo; Realismo; Ontologia; Obra literária; Ingarden. Idealism; Realism; Ontology; Literary work; Ingarden |
description |
The transcendental idealism announced by Husserl as identical to phenomenology itself was one of the most controversial points of his philosophy. In this respect, one of the first critics of the philosophical position espoused openly by Husserl since Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology was his old student Roman Ingarden. Its dense and resolute criticism in relation to Husserl’s idealistic perspective is supported by deep ontological investigations, contained mainly in his magnum opus, Controversy over the Existence of the World. However, some of the discussions displayed there were already present in his famous writing The Literary Work of Art, from 1929. Indeed, in this text, which seeks to demarcate the ontological status of literary works, Ingarden already undertakes analyses that allow him to question some of the central assumptions of the transcendental idealism advocated by Husserl. The proposal of this work is to present some of the basic notions of Ingarden’s ontology, as well as his views on the mode of being of literary work, and try to understand how these elements coordinate in order to provide to Ingarden some elements that allow him to attempt a realistic response to Husserl’s position. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/716 10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.716 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/716 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.716 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/716/432 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Allan J. Vieira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Allan J. Vieira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2016); 219-243 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732699071807488 |