The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miranda, Sérgio Gomes de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722
Resumo: Studies of language in the twentieth century and now in the present century are marked by the hegemony of three research currents: Structuralism; Innatism and Interactionism. In Structuralism, the language user is subjected to a sovereign code, against which he has no choice but to comply with the correct use standards. Deviate from the mean error. In Innatism prevails logicism. In the mind of the user resides everything he needs to be successful in their language. If the user think correctly, will also correct their linguistic expression. If the use is not consistent with the basic logic is a sign that you do not think properly. In Interactionism, the language is the result of interaction between users and ideologically defined contextually. The language uses are shared according to the user's knowledge of the semantic and pragmatic framework that resides in each context. In hegemony against these currents, this text rejects these three currents and builds its criticism from Michel Foucault's ideas. In this sense, is being outlined the conceptual direction given by the French philosopher, a new proposal, called here the linguistics of the statement, in the form of an archeology of language, to account for the speeches that give meaning to events. Still, this text relates this archeology to a new language teaching model in school, giving this school practice a different sense of what is commanded in various schools of the country.
id UFRB-4_b3466ca4d2bbdfdd98784d0dbb0272a6
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/722
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statementA análise arqueológica do discurso em Michel Foucault: por uma linguística do enunciadoLinguagem; Linguística do Enunciado; Arqueologia; Pesquisa; Ensino.Language; Linguistics of the Statement; Archaeology; Research; Teaching.Studies of language in the twentieth century and now in the present century are marked by the hegemony of three research currents: Structuralism; Innatism and Interactionism. In Structuralism, the language user is subjected to a sovereign code, against which he has no choice but to comply with the correct use standards. Deviate from the mean error. In Innatism prevails logicism. In the mind of the user resides everything he needs to be successful in their language. If the user think correctly, will also correct their linguistic expression. If the use is not consistent with the basic logic is a sign that you do not think properly. In Interactionism, the language is the result of interaction between users and ideologically defined contextually. The language uses are shared according to the user's knowledge of the semantic and pragmatic framework that resides in each context. In hegemony against these currents, this text rejects these three currents and builds its criticism from Michel Foucault's ideas. In this sense, is being outlined the conceptual direction given by the French philosopher, a new proposal, called here the linguistics of the statement, in the form of an archeology of language, to account for the speeches that give meaning to events. Still, this text relates this archeology to a new language teaching model in school, giving this school practice a different sense of what is commanded in various schools of the country.Os estudos da linguagem no século XX e agora no atual século são marcados pela hegemonia de três correntes de pesquisa: o Estruturalismo; o Inatismo e o Interacionismo. No Estruturalismo, o usuário da língua é submetido a um código soberano, contra o qual ele não tem escolha a não ser cumprir as normas do uso correto. Desviar do padrão significa erro. No Inatismo, prevalece o logicismo. Na mente do usuário reside tudo de que ele precisa para ser bem sucedido em sua linguagem. Se o usuário pensa corretamente, também correta será sua expressão linguística. Se o uso não condiz com a lógica de base é sinal de que o usuário não pensa corretamente. No Interacionismo, a linguagem é fruto da interação entre usuários ideologicamente e contextualmente delimitados. Os usos da língua são compartilhados de acordo com o conhecimento do usuário do quadro semântico e pragmático que reside em cada contexto. Na contra hegemonia dessas correntes, este texto rechaça essas três correntes e constrói a sua crítica a partir das ideias de Michel Foucault. Nesse sentido, vai sendo delineado o rumo conceitual dado pelo filósofo francês, uma nova proposta, denominada aqui de linguística do enunciado, sob a forma de uma arqueologia da linguagem, para dar conta dos discursos que dão sentido aos acontecimentos. Ainda, este texto relaciona essa arqueologia a um novo modelo de ensino da língua na escola, dando a essa prática escolar um sentido diferente do que tem imperado em diversas escolas desse país.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2016-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/72210.31977/grirfi.v14i2.722Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2016); 122-1382178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722/438Copyright (c) 2016 Sérgio Gomes de Mirandainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiranda, Sérgio Gomes de2020-06-30T18:16:07Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/722Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:16:07Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement
A análise arqueológica do discurso em Michel Foucault: por uma linguística do enunciado
title The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement
spellingShingle The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement
Miranda, Sérgio Gomes de
Linguagem; Linguística do Enunciado; Arqueologia; Pesquisa; Ensino.
Language; Linguistics of the Statement; Archaeology; Research; Teaching.
title_short The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement
title_full The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement
title_fullStr The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement
title_full_unstemmed The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement
title_sort The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement
author Miranda, Sérgio Gomes de
author_facet Miranda, Sérgio Gomes de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miranda, Sérgio Gomes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Linguagem; Linguística do Enunciado; Arqueologia; Pesquisa; Ensino.
Language; Linguistics of the Statement; Archaeology; Research; Teaching.
topic Linguagem; Linguística do Enunciado; Arqueologia; Pesquisa; Ensino.
Language; Linguistics of the Statement; Archaeology; Research; Teaching.
description Studies of language in the twentieth century and now in the present century are marked by the hegemony of three research currents: Structuralism; Innatism and Interactionism. In Structuralism, the language user is subjected to a sovereign code, against which he has no choice but to comply with the correct use standards. Deviate from the mean error. In Innatism prevails logicism. In the mind of the user resides everything he needs to be successful in their language. If the user think correctly, will also correct their linguistic expression. If the use is not consistent with the basic logic is a sign that you do not think properly. In Interactionism, the language is the result of interaction between users and ideologically defined contextually. The language uses are shared according to the user's knowledge of the semantic and pragmatic framework that resides in each context. In hegemony against these currents, this text rejects these three currents and builds its criticism from Michel Foucault's ideas. In this sense, is being outlined the conceptual direction given by the French philosopher, a new proposal, called here the linguistics of the statement, in the form of an archeology of language, to account for the speeches that give meaning to events. Still, this text relates this archeology to a new language teaching model in school, giving this school practice a different sense of what is commanded in various schools of the country.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722
10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.722
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.722
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722/438
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Sérgio Gomes de Miranda
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Sérgio Gomes de Miranda
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2016); 122-138
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732699084390400