The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722 |
Resumo: | Studies of language in the twentieth century and now in the present century are marked by the hegemony of three research currents: Structuralism; Innatism and Interactionism. In Structuralism, the language user is subjected to a sovereign code, against which he has no choice but to comply with the correct use standards. Deviate from the mean error. In Innatism prevails logicism. In the mind of the user resides everything he needs to be successful in their language. If the user think correctly, will also correct their linguistic expression. If the use is not consistent with the basic logic is a sign that you do not think properly. In Interactionism, the language is the result of interaction between users and ideologically defined contextually. The language uses are shared according to the user's knowledge of the semantic and pragmatic framework that resides in each context. In hegemony against these currents, this text rejects these three currents and builds its criticism from Michel Foucault's ideas. In this sense, is being outlined the conceptual direction given by the French philosopher, a new proposal, called here the linguistics of the statement, in the form of an archeology of language, to account for the speeches that give meaning to events. Still, this text relates this archeology to a new language teaching model in school, giving this school practice a different sense of what is commanded in various schools of the country. |
id |
UFRB-4_b3466ca4d2bbdfdd98784d0dbb0272a6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/722 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statementA análise arqueológica do discurso em Michel Foucault: por uma linguística do enunciadoLinguagem; Linguística do Enunciado; Arqueologia; Pesquisa; Ensino.Language; Linguistics of the Statement; Archaeology; Research; Teaching.Studies of language in the twentieth century and now in the present century are marked by the hegemony of three research currents: Structuralism; Innatism and Interactionism. In Structuralism, the language user is subjected to a sovereign code, against which he has no choice but to comply with the correct use standards. Deviate from the mean error. In Innatism prevails logicism. In the mind of the user resides everything he needs to be successful in their language. If the user think correctly, will also correct their linguistic expression. If the use is not consistent with the basic logic is a sign that you do not think properly. In Interactionism, the language is the result of interaction between users and ideologically defined contextually. The language uses are shared according to the user's knowledge of the semantic and pragmatic framework that resides in each context. In hegemony against these currents, this text rejects these three currents and builds its criticism from Michel Foucault's ideas. In this sense, is being outlined the conceptual direction given by the French philosopher, a new proposal, called here the linguistics of the statement, in the form of an archeology of language, to account for the speeches that give meaning to events. Still, this text relates this archeology to a new language teaching model in school, giving this school practice a different sense of what is commanded in various schools of the country.Os estudos da linguagem no século XX e agora no atual século são marcados pela hegemonia de três correntes de pesquisa: o Estruturalismo; o Inatismo e o Interacionismo. No Estruturalismo, o usuário da língua é submetido a um código soberano, contra o qual ele não tem escolha a não ser cumprir as normas do uso correto. Desviar do padrão significa erro. No Inatismo, prevalece o logicismo. Na mente do usuário reside tudo de que ele precisa para ser bem sucedido em sua linguagem. Se o usuário pensa corretamente, também correta será sua expressão linguística. Se o uso não condiz com a lógica de base é sinal de que o usuário não pensa corretamente. No Interacionismo, a linguagem é fruto da interação entre usuários ideologicamente e contextualmente delimitados. Os usos da língua são compartilhados de acordo com o conhecimento do usuário do quadro semântico e pragmático que reside em cada contexto. Na contra hegemonia dessas correntes, este texto rechaça essas três correntes e constrói a sua crítica a partir das ideias de Michel Foucault. Nesse sentido, vai sendo delineado o rumo conceitual dado pelo filósofo francês, uma nova proposta, denominada aqui de linguística do enunciado, sob a forma de uma arqueologia da linguagem, para dar conta dos discursos que dão sentido aos acontecimentos. Ainda, este texto relaciona essa arqueologia a um novo modelo de ensino da língua na escola, dando a essa prática escolar um sentido diferente do que tem imperado em diversas escolas desse país.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2016-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/72210.31977/grirfi.v14i2.722Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2016); 122-1382178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722/438Copyright (c) 2016 Sérgio Gomes de Mirandainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiranda, Sérgio Gomes de2020-06-30T18:16:07Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/722Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:16:07Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement A análise arqueológica do discurso em Michel Foucault: por uma linguística do enunciado |
title |
The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement |
spellingShingle |
The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement Miranda, Sérgio Gomes de Linguagem; Linguística do Enunciado; Arqueologia; Pesquisa; Ensino. Language; Linguistics of the Statement; Archaeology; Research; Teaching. |
title_short |
The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement |
title_full |
The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement |
title_fullStr |
The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement |
title_full_unstemmed |
The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement |
title_sort |
The analysis archaeological of the speech in Michel Foucault: for a linguistics of the statement |
author |
Miranda, Sérgio Gomes de |
author_facet |
Miranda, Sérgio Gomes de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Miranda, Sérgio Gomes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Linguagem; Linguística do Enunciado; Arqueologia; Pesquisa; Ensino. Language; Linguistics of the Statement; Archaeology; Research; Teaching. |
topic |
Linguagem; Linguística do Enunciado; Arqueologia; Pesquisa; Ensino. Language; Linguistics of the Statement; Archaeology; Research; Teaching. |
description |
Studies of language in the twentieth century and now in the present century are marked by the hegemony of three research currents: Structuralism; Innatism and Interactionism. In Structuralism, the language user is subjected to a sovereign code, against which he has no choice but to comply with the correct use standards. Deviate from the mean error. In Innatism prevails logicism. In the mind of the user resides everything he needs to be successful in their language. If the user think correctly, will also correct their linguistic expression. If the use is not consistent with the basic logic is a sign that you do not think properly. In Interactionism, the language is the result of interaction between users and ideologically defined contextually. The language uses are shared according to the user's knowledge of the semantic and pragmatic framework that resides in each context. In hegemony against these currents, this text rejects these three currents and builds its criticism from Michel Foucault's ideas. In this sense, is being outlined the conceptual direction given by the French philosopher, a new proposal, called here the linguistics of the statement, in the form of an archeology of language, to account for the speeches that give meaning to events. Still, this text relates this archeology to a new language teaching model in school, giving this school practice a different sense of what is commanded in various schools of the country. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722 10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.722 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.722 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/722/438 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Sérgio Gomes de Miranda info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Sérgio Gomes de Miranda |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2016); 122-138 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732699084390400 |