What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the tradition

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baltazar, Tiago Hercílio
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/514
Resumo: Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault fought an acute debate about their conceptions of what is History. In the present article we examine the debate between these two authors phocusing on the contributions they have made in their major works of the referred period. In the Critique of Dialectical Reason Sartre explicited a notion of history on the overall perspective of the overcome and transformation of structures by the human praxis, thus determining a fundamental place for the activity of the subject and his consciousness in the history understood as a process of totalization. On the other side, in The Order of Things and in The Archeology of Knowledge, Foucault subscribes his archeology to the broader context of an epistemological mutation of history. Thus, he claims to defend a new methodological practice, unmaking the anthropological subservience that, in his words, permeate an obsolete conception of history. From this point we compreend his objective to deconstruct a determined relationship between dialectics-humanism-history which forges a “great continuous and homogeneous evolution” to where everything converges. Investigating to what extent this archeology aimed at  an opposition to the notion of history which has man as a guarantee, that is, a subject who makes history and ensures its continuity, we shall see that the sartrean project of man desalienation meets its limit in Foucault in the form of a historicizing project which aims to reduce the place of this transcendental subject. Finally, we observe how this debate opens new possibilities for thinking the relationship between history and philosophy.
id UFRB-4_b4eac28221523d167e7992df1c28235c
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/514
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the traditionO que houve com o sujeito histórico na arqueologia de Michel Foucault? um debate com Sartre e a tradiçãoHistória; Sujeito; Arqueologia.History; Subject; Archeology.Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault fought an acute debate about their conceptions of what is History. In the present article we examine the debate between these two authors phocusing on the contributions they have made in their major works of the referred period. In the Critique of Dialectical Reason Sartre explicited a notion of history on the overall perspective of the overcome and transformation of structures by the human praxis, thus determining a fundamental place for the activity of the subject and his consciousness in the history understood as a process of totalization. On the other side, in The Order of Things and in The Archeology of Knowledge, Foucault subscribes his archeology to the broader context of an epistemological mutation of history. Thus, he claims to defend a new methodological practice, unmaking the anthropological subservience that, in his words, permeate an obsolete conception of history. From this point we compreend his objective to deconstruct a determined relationship between dialectics-humanism-history which forges a “great continuous and homogeneous evolution” to where everything converges. Investigating to what extent this archeology aimed at  an opposition to the notion of history which has man as a guarantee, that is, a subject who makes history and ensures its continuity, we shall see that the sartrean project of man desalienation meets its limit in Foucault in the form of a historicizing project which aims to reduce the place of this transcendental subject. Finally, we observe how this debate opens new possibilities for thinking the relationship between history and philosophy.Jean-Paul Sartre e Michel Foucault travaram acirrado debate em torno de suas concepções acerca do que é a História. No presente artigo examinaremos o debate entre esses dois autores privilegiando as contribuições que fizeram a partir de suas obras principais nos anos 60.  Na Crítica da Razão Dialética Sartre explicita uma noção de História que tem como perspectiva geral a superação e a transformação de estruturas pela práxis humana, determinando assim um lugar fundamental para a atividade do sujeito e de sua consciência na história entendida como processo de totalização dialética. Por outro lado, em As Palavras e as Coisas e em A Arqueologia do Saber, Foucault inscreve sua arqueologia no contexto mais geral de uma mutação epistemológica da história. Seu objetivo é defender uma prática metodológica nova, desfazendo as sujeições antropológicas que, nas suas palavras, permeiam uma concepção obsoleta de história. A partir daí compreende-se sua preocupação em desconstruir uma determinada relação entre dialética-humanismo-história como forjadora de uma “grande evolução contínua e homogênea” para onde tudo converge. Investigando em que medida esta arqueologia esteve voltada para uma contraposição com a noção de história que tem o homem como garantia, isto é, um sujeito que faz a história e garante sua continuidade, veremos que o projeto sartreano de desalienação do homem encontra seu limite, em Foucault, na forma de um projeto de historicização que visa reduzir o lugar desse sujeito transcendental. Finalmente, esses deslocamentos tornam patentes novas possibilidades para se pensar a relação entre história e filosofia.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2012-06-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/51410.31977/grirfi.v5i1.514Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 5 n. 1 (2012); 141-1532178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/514/235Copyright (c) 2012 Tiago Hercílio Baltazarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaltazar, Tiago Hercílio2020-06-30T18:20:34Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/514Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:20:34Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the tradition
O que houve com o sujeito histórico na arqueologia de Michel Foucault? um debate com Sartre e a tradição
title What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the tradition
spellingShingle What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the tradition
Baltazar, Tiago Hercílio
História; Sujeito; Arqueologia.
History; Subject; Archeology.
title_short What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the tradition
title_full What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the tradition
title_fullStr What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the tradition
title_full_unstemmed What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the tradition
title_sort What happened to the historical subject in Michel Foucault’s archeology? A debate with Sartre and the tradition
author Baltazar, Tiago Hercílio
author_facet Baltazar, Tiago Hercílio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baltazar, Tiago Hercílio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv História; Sujeito; Arqueologia.
History; Subject; Archeology.
topic História; Sujeito; Arqueologia.
History; Subject; Archeology.
description Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault fought an acute debate about their conceptions of what is History. In the present article we examine the debate between these two authors phocusing on the contributions they have made in their major works of the referred period. In the Critique of Dialectical Reason Sartre explicited a notion of history on the overall perspective of the overcome and transformation of structures by the human praxis, thus determining a fundamental place for the activity of the subject and his consciousness in the history understood as a process of totalization. On the other side, in The Order of Things and in The Archeology of Knowledge, Foucault subscribes his archeology to the broader context of an epistemological mutation of history. Thus, he claims to defend a new methodological practice, unmaking the anthropological subservience that, in his words, permeate an obsolete conception of history. From this point we compreend his objective to deconstruct a determined relationship between dialectics-humanism-history which forges a “great continuous and homogeneous evolution” to where everything converges. Investigating to what extent this archeology aimed at  an opposition to the notion of history which has man as a guarantee, that is, a subject who makes history and ensures its continuity, we shall see that the sartrean project of man desalienation meets its limit in Foucault in the form of a historicizing project which aims to reduce the place of this transcendental subject. Finally, we observe how this debate opens new possibilities for thinking the relationship between history and philosophy.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-06-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/514
10.31977/grirfi.v5i1.514
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/514
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v5i1.514
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/514/235
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Tiago Hercílio Baltazar
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Tiago Hercílio Baltazar
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 5 n. 1 (2012); 141-153
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732698187857920