Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah Arendt

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reis, Claudio Ricardo Martins dos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/793
Resumo: This work aims to reflect on the emergence of modernity, the consolidation of modern scientific thinking and its specifically undesirable political consequences. For that, I rely on the thought of Hannah Arendt. Arendt highlights three events as the main precursors of the modern era: the “discovery” of the continents, the Reformation, and the invention and use of the telescope. I briefly discuss the relation of these events to the alienation from the world, as understood by Arendt, and delve into the novelties of science. Here I mention Galileo and the Copernican revolution, the experimental and quantitative method, the role of instrument manufacturing in the production of knowledge, the evaluation criterion of practical success, and logical-mathematical reasoning as elements that begin to shape scientific activity. From there, I highlight the movement, as described by Arendt, of modern scientific thought to encompass the most diverse fields of daily life, especially in the public sphere. I conclude highlighting the way in which scientism - which has homo faber’s characteristics - undermines the possibility of action when it enters the political sphere. Because “to be free and to act are the same”, it also prevents the manifestation of freedom. Moreover, I approach how scientism goes against human plurality, singularity and spontaneity. Totalitarian governments and consumer societies are extreme and real examples of what homo faber's logic can do when it replaces the field of action. At the end, I highlight a great challenge that we need to face.
id UFRB-4_ce67bbb35f01c2f8fa4b71b61f01892a
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/793
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah ArendtPensamento científico moderno e abalo à esfera pública: uma reflexão com base em Hannah ArendtAção; Alienação do mundo; Cientificismo; Hannah Arendt; Pluralidade.Action; Alienation from the world; Scientism; Hannah Arendt; PluralityThis work aims to reflect on the emergence of modernity, the consolidation of modern scientific thinking and its specifically undesirable political consequences. For that, I rely on the thought of Hannah Arendt. Arendt highlights three events as the main precursors of the modern era: the “discovery” of the continents, the Reformation, and the invention and use of the telescope. I briefly discuss the relation of these events to the alienation from the world, as understood by Arendt, and delve into the novelties of science. Here I mention Galileo and the Copernican revolution, the experimental and quantitative method, the role of instrument manufacturing in the production of knowledge, the evaluation criterion of practical success, and logical-mathematical reasoning as elements that begin to shape scientific activity. From there, I highlight the movement, as described by Arendt, of modern scientific thought to encompass the most diverse fields of daily life, especially in the public sphere. I conclude highlighting the way in which scientism - which has homo faber’s characteristics - undermines the possibility of action when it enters the political sphere. Because “to be free and to act are the same”, it also prevents the manifestation of freedom. Moreover, I approach how scientism goes against human plurality, singularity and spontaneity. Totalitarian governments and consumer societies are extreme and real examples of what homo faber's logic can do when it replaces the field of action. At the end, I highlight a great challenge that we need to face.Este trabalho tem por objetivo refletir sobre a emergência da modernidade, a consolidação do pensamento científico moderno e suas consequências especificamente indesejáveis no domínio da política. Para isso, baseio-me no pensamento de Hannah Arendt. Arendt destaca três eventos como os principais precursores da era moderna: a exploração dos continentes, a Reforma e a invenção e utilização do telescópio. Discuto brevemente a relação desses eventos com a alienação do mundo, tal como entendida por Arendt, e me aprofundo nas novidades relativas à ciência. Menciono Galileu e a revolução copernicana, o método experimental e quantitativo, o papel da fabricação de instrumentos na produção do conhecimento, o critério avaliativo de sucesso prático e o raciocínio lógico-matemático como elementos que passam a moldar a atividade científica. A partir daí, destaco a tendência, descrita por Arendt, do pensamento científico moderno em abarcar os mais diversos campos da vida cotidiana, especialmente seu âmbito público. Concluo destacando o modo como o pensamento cientificista – que possui características próprias do homo faber – mina a possibilidade de ação quando adentra a esfera política. Na medida em que “ser livre e agir é a mesma coisa”, impede também a manifestação da liberdade. Mais do que isso, abordo como o cientificismo vai à contramão da pluralidade, da singularidade e da espontaneidade humanas. Os governos totalitários e as sociedades de consumo são exemplos extremos e reais do que a racionalidade do homo faber pode fazer quando substitui o campo da ação. Ao finalizar, destaco um grande desafio que temos pela frente.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2018-06-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/79310.31977/grirfi.v17i1.793Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 1 (2018); 304-3142178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/793/507Copyright (c) 2018 Claudio Ricardo Martins dos Reisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReis, Claudio Ricardo Martins dos2020-06-30T18:15:07Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/793Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:15:07Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah Arendt
Pensamento científico moderno e abalo à esfera pública: uma reflexão com base em Hannah Arendt
title Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah Arendt
spellingShingle Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah Arendt
Reis, Claudio Ricardo Martins dos
Ação; Alienação do mundo; Cientificismo; Hannah Arendt; Pluralidade.
Action; Alienation from the world; Scientism; Hannah Arendt; Plurality
title_short Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah Arendt
title_full Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah Arendt
title_fullStr Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah Arendt
title_full_unstemmed Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah Arendt
title_sort Modern scientific thinking and the shock of the public sphere: a reflection based on Hannah Arendt
author Reis, Claudio Ricardo Martins dos
author_facet Reis, Claudio Ricardo Martins dos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis, Claudio Ricardo Martins dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ação; Alienação do mundo; Cientificismo; Hannah Arendt; Pluralidade.
Action; Alienation from the world; Scientism; Hannah Arendt; Plurality
topic Ação; Alienação do mundo; Cientificismo; Hannah Arendt; Pluralidade.
Action; Alienation from the world; Scientism; Hannah Arendt; Plurality
description This work aims to reflect on the emergence of modernity, the consolidation of modern scientific thinking and its specifically undesirable political consequences. For that, I rely on the thought of Hannah Arendt. Arendt highlights three events as the main precursors of the modern era: the “discovery” of the continents, the Reformation, and the invention and use of the telescope. I briefly discuss the relation of these events to the alienation from the world, as understood by Arendt, and delve into the novelties of science. Here I mention Galileo and the Copernican revolution, the experimental and quantitative method, the role of instrument manufacturing in the production of knowledge, the evaluation criterion of practical success, and logical-mathematical reasoning as elements that begin to shape scientific activity. From there, I highlight the movement, as described by Arendt, of modern scientific thought to encompass the most diverse fields of daily life, especially in the public sphere. I conclude highlighting the way in which scientism - which has homo faber’s characteristics - undermines the possibility of action when it enters the political sphere. Because “to be free and to act are the same”, it also prevents the manifestation of freedom. Moreover, I approach how scientism goes against human plurality, singularity and spontaneity. Totalitarian governments and consumer societies are extreme and real examples of what homo faber's logic can do when it replaces the field of action. At the end, I highlight a great challenge that we need to face.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/793
10.31977/grirfi.v17i1.793
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/793
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v17i1.793
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/793/507
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Claudio Ricardo Martins dos Reis
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Claudio Ricardo Martins dos Reis
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 1 (2018); 304-314
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732699197636608