NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022 |
Resumo: | This research aims to understand how power relations are addressed in organizations literature, with a systematic literature review of the Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science Database. Although the literature on interorganizational relationships recognizes the critical role of power, a succession of theories with different empirical, theoretical and methodological perspectives demonstrates that there is still a lack of consensus about which actors hold the power in these contexts. The research questions are: How do recent studies in business networks deal with power? What are the implications of the main theoretical paradigms used? Analysis of the selected publications points to the multiplicity of theoretical perspectives on power in the literature and indicates an increased interest in the subject over time. The major theoretical perspectives identified are the Resource Dependency Theory; the Network Exchange Theory; and the Transaction Costs Theory. These theories are discussed under the theoretical framework and a set of conceptual propositions is defined in order to assess the implications of the paradigms associated with each theoretical stream. |
id |
UFRGS-13_7197bec1c61a1e898d459b2e8676e49a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/62022 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-13 |
network_name_str |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTIONINFLUENCIA DEL PODER EN REDES EMPRESARIALES - ANÁLISIS DE LA EVOLUCIÓN DE LA TEORÍAInfluência do Poder nas Redes de Negócio – Análise da evolução da teoriaPoderRedes de NegóciosParadigmasPowerBusiness NetworksParadigms.PoderRedes de NegociosParadigmasThis research aims to understand how power relations are addressed in organizations literature, with a systematic literature review of the Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science Database. Although the literature on interorganizational relationships recognizes the critical role of power, a succession of theories with different empirical, theoretical and methodological perspectives demonstrates that there is still a lack of consensus about which actors hold the power in these contexts. The research questions are: How do recent studies in business networks deal with power? What are the implications of the main theoretical paradigms used? Analysis of the selected publications points to the multiplicity of theoretical perspectives on power in the literature and indicates an increased interest in the subject over time. The major theoretical perspectives identified are the Resource Dependency Theory; the Network Exchange Theory; and the Transaction Costs Theory. These theories are discussed under the theoretical framework and a set of conceptual propositions is defined in order to assess the implications of the paradigms associated with each theoretical stream.Esta investigación busca comprender cómo se abordan las relaciones de poder en la literatura de organizaciones, mediante una revisión sistemática de la literatura utilizando la base de datos Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science. Aunque la literatura sobre relaciones interorganizacionales reconozca el papel crítico del poder, una sucesíon de teorías con variadas perspectivas empíricas, teóricas y metodológicas demuestra que todavía hay una falta de consenso sobre cuales actores detienen el poder en estos contextos. Las preguntas de investigación son: ¿Cómo estudios recientes en redes empresariales tratan del poder? ¿Cuáles son las implicaciones de los principales paradigmas teóricos utilizados? El análisis de las publicaciones seleccionadas indica la multiplicidad de perspectivas teóricas em el enfoque de poder en la literatura, así como un aumento del interés en el tema al paso del tiempo. Las principales perspectivas teóricas identificadas son la Teoría de la Dependencia de Recursos; la Teoría del Intercambio; y la Teoría de los Costes de Transacción. Estas teorías se discuten con base en el marco teórico y un conjunto de proposiciones conceptuales se define a fin de evaluar las consecuencias de los paradigmas asociados a cada corriente teórica. Esta pesquisa busca compreender como as relações de poder são abordadas na literatura de organizações, por meio de uma revisão sistemática da literatura utilizando a base de dados Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science. Embora a literatura de relações interorganizacionais reconheça o papel crítico do poder, uma sucessão de teorias com diferentes perspectivas empíricas, teóricas e metodológicas demonstra que ainda há uma falta de consenso a respeito de quais atores detêm o poder nestes contextos. São questões de pesquisa: Como os recentes estudos em redes de negócio abordam o poder? Quais as implicações dos principais paradigmas teóricos utilizados? A análise das publicações selecionadas aponta para a multiplicidade de perspectivas teóricas na abordagem do poder na literatura e indica um aumento do interesse no tema ao longo do tempo. As principais perspectivas teóricas identificadas são a Teoria da Dependência de Recursos; a Teoria da Troca em Redes; e a Teoria de Custos de Transação. Essas teorias são analisadas sob o quadro teórico e um conjunto de proposições conceituais é definido, de modo a avaliar as implicações dos paradigmas associados a cada corrente teórica.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2016-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSystematic Review of the Literaturerevisión sistemática de la literaturaAvaliado pelos paresRevisão Sistemática da Literaturaapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 22 n. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-251413-23111980-4164reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022/37597Oliveira, LuisSacomano Neto, MárioBoaventura, João Maurício Gamainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-06-07T20:04:42Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/62022Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/read/oaiea_read@ufrgs.br1413-23111413-2311opendoar:2016-06-07T20:04:42REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION INFLUENCIA DEL PODER EN REDES EMPRESARIALES - ANÁLISIS DE LA EVOLUCIÓN DE LA TEORÍA Influência do Poder nas Redes de Negócio – Análise da evolução da teoria |
title |
NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION |
spellingShingle |
NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION Oliveira, Luis Poder Redes de Negócios Paradigmas Power Business Networks Paradigms. Poder Redes de Negocios Paradigmas |
title_short |
NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION |
title_full |
NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION |
title_fullStr |
NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION |
title_full_unstemmed |
NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION |
title_sort |
NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION |
author |
Oliveira, Luis |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Luis Sacomano Neto, Mário Boaventura, João Maurício Gama |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sacomano Neto, Mário Boaventura, João Maurício Gama |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Luis Sacomano Neto, Mário Boaventura, João Maurício Gama |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Poder Redes de Negócios Paradigmas Power Business Networks Paradigms. Poder Redes de Negocios Paradigmas |
topic |
Poder Redes de Negócios Paradigmas Power Business Networks Paradigms. Poder Redes de Negocios Paradigmas |
description |
This research aims to understand how power relations are addressed in organizations literature, with a systematic literature review of the Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science Database. Although the literature on interorganizational relationships recognizes the critical role of power, a succession of theories with different empirical, theoretical and methodological perspectives demonstrates that there is still a lack of consensus about which actors hold the power in these contexts. The research questions are: How do recent studies in business networks deal with power? What are the implications of the main theoretical paradigms used? Analysis of the selected publications points to the multiplicity of theoretical perspectives on power in the literature and indicates an increased interest in the subject over time. The major theoretical perspectives identified are the Resource Dependency Theory; the Network Exchange Theory; and the Transaction Costs Theory. These theories are discussed under the theoretical framework and a set of conceptual propositions is defined in order to assess the implications of the paradigms associated with each theoretical stream. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Systematic Review of the Literature revisión sistemática de la literatura Avaliado pelos pares Revisão Sistemática da Literatura |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022/37597 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25 Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25 Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 22 n. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25 1413-2311 1980-4164 reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ea_read@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799766205494460416 |