NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Luis
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Sacomano Neto, Mário, Boaventura, João Maurício Gama
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022
Resumo: This research aims to understand how power relations are addressed in organizations literature, with a systematic literature review of the Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science Database. Although the literature on interorganizational relationships recognizes the critical role of power, a succession of theories with different empirical, theoretical and methodological perspectives demonstrates that there is still a lack of consensus about which actors hold the power in these contexts. The research questions are: How do recent studies in business networks deal with power? What are the implications of the main theoretical paradigms used? Analysis of the selected publications points to the multiplicity of theoretical perspectives on power in the literature and indicates an increased interest in the subject over time. The major theoretical perspectives identified are the Resource Dependency Theory; the Network Exchange Theory; and the Transaction Costs Theory. These theories are discussed under the theoretical framework and a set of conceptual propositions is defined in order to assess the implications of the paradigms associated with each theoretical stream.
id UFRGS-13_7197bec1c61a1e898d459b2e8676e49a
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/62022
network_acronym_str UFRGS-13
network_name_str REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTIONINFLUENCIA DEL PODER EN REDES EMPRESARIALES - ANÁLISIS DE LA EVOLUCIÓN DE LA TEORÍAInfluência do Poder nas Redes de Negócio – Análise da evolução da teoriaPoderRedes de NegóciosParadigmasPowerBusiness NetworksParadigms.PoderRedes de NegociosParadigmasThis research aims to understand how power relations are addressed in organizations literature, with a systematic literature review of the Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science Database. Although the literature on interorganizational relationships recognizes the critical role of power, a succession of theories with different empirical, theoretical and methodological perspectives demonstrates that there is still a lack of consensus about which actors hold the power in these contexts. The research questions are: How do recent studies in business networks deal with power? What are the implications of the main theoretical paradigms used? Analysis of the selected publications points to the multiplicity of theoretical perspectives on power in the literature and indicates an increased interest in the subject over time. The major theoretical perspectives identified are the Resource Dependency Theory; the Network Exchange Theory; and the Transaction Costs Theory. These theories are discussed under the theoretical framework and a set of conceptual propositions is defined in order to assess the implications of the paradigms associated with each theoretical stream.Esta investigación busca comprender cómo se abordan las relaciones de poder en la literatura de organizaciones, mediante una revisión sistemática de la literatura utilizando la base de datos Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science. Aunque la literatura sobre relaciones interorganizacionales reconozca el papel crítico del poder, una sucesíon de teorías con variadas perspectivas empíricas, teóricas y metodológicas demuestra que todavía hay una falta de consenso sobre cuales actores detienen el poder en estos contextos. Las preguntas de investigación son: ¿Cómo estudios recientes en redes empresariales tratan del poder? ¿Cuáles son las implicaciones de los principales paradigmas teóricos utilizados? El análisis de las publicaciones seleccionadas indica la multiplicidad de perspectivas teóricas em el enfoque de poder en la literatura, así como un aumento del interés en el tema al paso del tiempo. Las principales perspectivas teóricas identificadas son la Teoría de la Dependencia de Recursos; la Teoría del Intercambio; y la Teoría de los Costes de Transacción. Estas teorías se discuten con base en el marco teórico y un conjunto de proposiciones conceptuales se define a fin de evaluar las consecuencias de los paradigmas asociados a cada corriente teórica. Esta pesquisa busca compreender como as relações de poder são abordadas na literatura de organizações, por meio de uma revisão sistemática da literatura utilizando a base de dados Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science. Embora a literatura de relações interorganizacionais reconheça o papel crítico do poder, uma sucessão de teorias com diferentes perspectivas empíricas, teóricas e metodológicas demonstra que ainda há uma falta de consenso a respeito de quais atores detêm o poder nestes contextos. São questões de pesquisa: Como os recentes estudos em redes de negócio abordam o poder? Quais as implicações dos principais paradigmas teóricos utilizados? A análise das publicações selecionadas aponta para a multiplicidade de perspectivas teóricas na abordagem do poder na literatura e indica um aumento do interesse no tema ao longo do tempo. As principais perspectivas teóricas identificadas são a Teoria da Dependência de Recursos; a Teoria da Troca em Redes; e a Teoria de Custos de Transação. Essas teorias são analisadas sob o quadro teórico e um conjunto de proposições conceituais é definido, de modo a avaliar as implicações dos paradigmas associados a cada corrente teórica.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2016-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSystematic Review of the Literaturerevisión sistemática de la literaturaAvaliado pelos paresRevisão Sistemática da Literaturaapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 22 n. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-251413-23111980-4164reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022/37597Oliveira, LuisSacomano Neto, MárioBoaventura, João Maurício Gamainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-06-07T20:04:42Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/62022Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/read/oaiea_read@ufrgs.br1413-23111413-2311opendoar:2016-06-07T20:04:42REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION
INFLUENCIA DEL PODER EN REDES EMPRESARIALES - ANÁLISIS DE LA EVOLUCIÓN DE LA TEORÍA
Influência do Poder nas Redes de Negócio – Análise da evolução da teoria
title NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION
spellingShingle NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION
Oliveira, Luis
Poder
Redes de Negócios
Paradigmas
Power
Business Networks
Paradigms.
Poder
Redes de Negocios
Paradigmas
title_short NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION
title_full NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION
title_fullStr NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION
title_full_unstemmed NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION
title_sort NFLUENCE OF POWER IN BUSINESS NETWORKS – ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY’S EVOLUTION
author Oliveira, Luis
author_facet Oliveira, Luis
Sacomano Neto, Mário
Boaventura, João Maurício Gama
author_role author
author2 Sacomano Neto, Mário
Boaventura, João Maurício Gama
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Luis
Sacomano Neto, Mário
Boaventura, João Maurício Gama
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Poder
Redes de Negócios
Paradigmas
Power
Business Networks
Paradigms.
Poder
Redes de Negocios
Paradigmas
topic Poder
Redes de Negócios
Paradigmas
Power
Business Networks
Paradigms.
Poder
Redes de Negocios
Paradigmas
description This research aims to understand how power relations are addressed in organizations literature, with a systematic literature review of the Thomson Reuters (ISI) Web of Science Database. Although the literature on interorganizational relationships recognizes the critical role of power, a succession of theories with different empirical, theoretical and methodological perspectives demonstrates that there is still a lack of consensus about which actors hold the power in these contexts. The research questions are: How do recent studies in business networks deal with power? What are the implications of the main theoretical paradigms used? Analysis of the selected publications points to the multiplicity of theoretical perspectives on power in the literature and indicates an increased interest in the subject over time. The major theoretical perspectives identified are the Resource Dependency Theory; the Network Exchange Theory; and the Transaction Costs Theory. These theories are discussed under the theoretical framework and a set of conceptual propositions is defined in order to assess the implications of the paradigms associated with each theoretical stream.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Systematic Review of the Literature
revisión sistemática de la literatura
Avaliado pelos pares
Revisão Sistemática da Literatura
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/62022/37597
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25
Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25
Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 22 n. 1 (2016): EDIÇÃO 83 - JAN/ABR 2016; 01-25
1413-2311
1980-4164
reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ea_read@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766205494460416