THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORK

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Spadotto Balarin, Camila
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Zerbini, Thaís, Barros Martins, Lara
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/41925
Resumo: Among the variables that influence the effectiveness of Training, Development and Education actions (TD&E), the contextual ones stand out. Based on this, we studied the relationship between the variables Learning Support – perceived support and psychosocial support for natural or induced learning in the workplace – and Training Impact at Work – influence of what has been learned in TD&E actions on overall performance, attitudes and motivation. To collect data, we used two validated and reliable scales available in the national literature: Learning Support (33 items, frequency range 0-10, α = 0.96) and Training Impact at Work (12 items, agreement scale from 1 to 5, α = 0.90). Data collection was conducted in person and virtually in three private companies, two to four weeks after the end of training; a total of 83 questionnaires concerning seven trainings was achieved. The sample is comprised by 61 men and 22 women, 18-64 years old, and 53% have completed higher education. Exploratory and descriptive analyzes were performed and also correlation analysis, in order to assess the relationship between the two variables. The Learning Support Scale presented averages between 3.37 and 8.12, high standard deviation and high variation in minimum and maximum responses, indicating divergent responses. The Training Impact at Work Scale presented averages between 3.65 and 4.39, and showed a low standard deviation, but the variation of the minimum and maximum responses is high in most cases, indicating that some respondents did not agree with the statements. Participants perceive moderately Learning Support in the company and judge that have occurred Training Impact at Work. Variables showed a significant and moderate correlation (r = 0.53), which corroborates the literature’s findings related to psychosocial support; but still more research is needed about Learning Support in order to check the scale’s evidences of validity and better define and distinguish this concept in relation to other.
id UFRGS-13_a08bafc2baac4903035f22801fe1fc2e
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/41925
network_acronym_str UFRGS-13
network_name_str REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORKLA RELACIÓN ENTRE APOYO AL APRENDIZAJE Y EL IMPACTO DE LA FORMACIÓN EN EL TRABAJOA RELAÇÃO ENTRE SUPORTE À APRENDIZAGEM E IMPACTO DE TREINAMENTO NO TRABALHOTraining EvaluationLearning SupportTraining Impact at WorkEvaluación de la formaciónApoyo al AprendizajeImpacto de la Formación en el TrabajoAvaliação de treinamentoSuporte à AprendizagemImpacto de Treinamento no TrabalhoAmong the variables that influence the effectiveness of Training, Development and Education actions (TD&E), the contextual ones stand out. Based on this, we studied the relationship between the variables Learning Support – perceived support and psychosocial support for natural or induced learning in the workplace – and Training Impact at Work – influence of what has been learned in TD&E actions on overall performance, attitudes and motivation. To collect data, we used two validated and reliable scales available in the national literature: Learning Support (33 items, frequency range 0-10, α = 0.96) and Training Impact at Work (12 items, agreement scale from 1 to 5, α = 0.90). Data collection was conducted in person and virtually in three private companies, two to four weeks after the end of training; a total of 83 questionnaires concerning seven trainings was achieved. The sample is comprised by 61 men and 22 women, 18-64 years old, and 53% have completed higher education. Exploratory and descriptive analyzes were performed and also correlation analysis, in order to assess the relationship between the two variables. The Learning Support Scale presented averages between 3.37 and 8.12, high standard deviation and high variation in minimum and maximum responses, indicating divergent responses. The Training Impact at Work Scale presented averages between 3.65 and 4.39, and showed a low standard deviation, but the variation of the minimum and maximum responses is high in most cases, indicating that some respondents did not agree with the statements. Participants perceive moderately Learning Support in the company and judge that have occurred Training Impact at Work. Variables showed a significant and moderate correlation (r = 0.53), which corroborates the literature’s findings related to psychosocial support; but still more research is needed about Learning Support in order to check the scale’s evidences of validity and better define and distinguish this concept in relation to other.Entre las variables que influyen en la eficacia de las acciones de formación y desarrollo, se destacan principalmente las contextuales. Se estudió la relación entre la variable Apoyo al Aprendizaje – apoyo percibido y apoyo psicosocial al aprendizaje natural o inducido en el trabajo – y el Impacto de la Formación en el Trabajo – la influencia del aprendido en acciones de formación y desarrollo en el rendimiento general, en las actitudes y en la motivación del individuo. Para la recogida de los datos, se utilizaron dos escalas validadas y fiables disponibles en la literatura nacional: Apoyo al Aprendizaje (33 ítems, escala de frecuencia de 0 a 10, α = 0,96) e Impacto de la Formación en el Trabajo (12 ítems, escala de concordancia de 1 a 5, α = 0,90). La recogida de datos se llevó a cabo, presencial y virtualmente, en três organizaciones privadas, de dos a cuatro semanas después del final de la formación; fueron conseguidos un total de 83 cuestionarios sobre siete formaciones ofrecidas. La muestra estaba compuesta por 61 hombres y 22 mujeres, de 18-64 años de edad, de los cuales el 53% completó la enseñanza superior. Los análisis de datos fueron exploratórios, descriptivos y de correlación, para evaluar el grado de relación entre las dos variables. La Escala de Apoyo al Aprendizaje presentó promedios entre 3,37 y 8,12, con una desviación estándar alta y una variación alta en las respuestas máximas y mínimas, lo que indica que los encuestados calificaron los ítems de diferentes maneras. La media de las respuestas de la Escala de Impacto de la Formación en el Trabajo osciló entre 3,65 y 4,39, mostrando una desviación estándar baja, pero la variedad de respuestas mínimas y máximas fue alta en la mayoría de los casos, lo que indica que algunos de los encuestados no estaban de acuerdo con las afirmaciones. Los participantes perciben moderadamente Apoyo al Aprendizaje en la organización y consideran que hubo Impacto de la Formación en el Trabajo. Las variables presentaron correlación significativa y moderada (r = 0,53), lo que corrobora los resultados de la literatura relacionada con el apoyo psicosocial, pero aún se necesita más investigación relacionada con el Apoyo al Aprendizaje, a fin de seguir la comprobación de la fiabilidad de la escala de Apoyo al Aprendizaje, y definir y distinguir mejor este concepto en relación con otros relacionados.Dentre as variáveis que influenciam a efetividade de ações de Treinamento, Desenvolvimento e Educação (TD&E), destacam-se, principalmente, as contextuais. Visto isso, estudou-se a relação entre as variáveis: Suporte à Aprendizagem – percepção de apoio e suporte psicossocial à aprendizagem natural ou induzida no ambiente de trabalho, e Impacto do Treinamento no Trabalho – influência do que foi aprendido em ações de TD&E no desempenho geral, nas atitudes e motivação do indivíduo. Para a coleta de dados, utilizaram-se duas escalas validadas e fidedignas disponíveis na literatura nacional: Suporte à Aprendizagem (33 itens, escala de frequência de 0 a 10, α=0,96) e Impacto de Treinamento no Trabalho (12 itens, escala de concordância de 1 a 5, α=0,90). A coleta de dados foi realizada presencial e virtualmente em três organizações de natureza privada, após duas a quatro semanas do término do treinamento, totalizando 83 questionários respondidos referentes a sete treinamentos ofertados. A amostra é composta por 61 homens e 22 mulheres, de 18 a 64 anos de idade, sendo que 53% possui ensino superior completo. Realizaram-se análises exploratórias e descritivas dos dados, e análises de correlação, a fim de avaliar o grau de relacionamento entre as duas variáveis. A Escala de Suporte à Aprendizagem apresentou médias entre 3,37 e 8,12, alto desvio-padrão e alta variação nas respostas mínimas e máximas, indicando que os respondentes avaliaram os itens de maneira divergente. As médias das respostas da Escala de Impacto de Treinamento no Trabalho variaram entre 3,65 e 4,39, e apresentaram baixo desvio-padrão, porém a variação das respostas mínima e máxima é alta, na maioria dos casos, indicando que alguns respondentes não concordam com as afirmações. Os participantes percebem moderadamente o Suporte à Aprendizagem na organização e julgam ter ocorrido Impacto de Treinamento no Trabalho. As variáveis apresentaram correlação significativa e moderada (r=0,53), o que corrobora os achados da literatura relacionados ao suporte psicossocial, mas ainda são necessárias mais pesquisas relacionadas ao Suporte à Aprendizagem, a fim de continuar a verificação de evidências de validade da escala de Suporte à Aprendizagem e definir e distinguir melhor o conceito em relação a outros conceitos correlatos.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2014-07-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionarticleartículoAvaliado pelos paresartigoapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/41925Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2014): EDIÇÃO 78 - mai/ago 2014; 341-370Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2014): EDIÇÃO 78 - mai/ago 2014; 341-370Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 20 n. 2 (2014): EDIÇÃO 78 - mai/ago 2014; 341-3701413-23111980-4164reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/41925/30507Spadotto Balarin, CamilaZerbini, ThaísBarros Martins, Larainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-07-29T13:27:39Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/41925Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/read/oaiea_read@ufrgs.br1413-23111413-2311opendoar:2014-07-29T13:27:39REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORK
LA RELACIÓN ENTRE APOYO AL APRENDIZAJE Y EL IMPACTO DE LA FORMACIÓN EN EL TRABAJO
A RELAÇÃO ENTRE SUPORTE À APRENDIZAGEM E IMPACTO DE TREINAMENTO NO TRABALHO
title THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORK
spellingShingle THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORK
Spadotto Balarin, Camila
Training Evaluation
Learning Support
Training Impact at Work
Evaluación de la formación
Apoyo al Aprendizaje
Impacto de la Formación en el Trabajo
Avaliação de treinamento
Suporte à Aprendizagem
Impacto de Treinamento no Trabalho
title_short THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORK
title_full THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORK
title_fullStr THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORK
title_full_unstemmed THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORK
title_sort THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING SUPPORT AND TRAINING IMPACT AT WORK
author Spadotto Balarin, Camila
author_facet Spadotto Balarin, Camila
Zerbini, Thaís
Barros Martins, Lara
author_role author
author2 Zerbini, Thaís
Barros Martins, Lara
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Spadotto Balarin, Camila
Zerbini, Thaís
Barros Martins, Lara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Training Evaluation
Learning Support
Training Impact at Work
Evaluación de la formación
Apoyo al Aprendizaje
Impacto de la Formación en el Trabajo
Avaliação de treinamento
Suporte à Aprendizagem
Impacto de Treinamento no Trabalho
topic Training Evaluation
Learning Support
Training Impact at Work
Evaluación de la formación
Apoyo al Aprendizaje
Impacto de la Formación en el Trabajo
Avaliação de treinamento
Suporte à Aprendizagem
Impacto de Treinamento no Trabalho
description Among the variables that influence the effectiveness of Training, Development and Education actions (TD&E), the contextual ones stand out. Based on this, we studied the relationship between the variables Learning Support – perceived support and psychosocial support for natural or induced learning in the workplace – and Training Impact at Work – influence of what has been learned in TD&E actions on overall performance, attitudes and motivation. To collect data, we used two validated and reliable scales available in the national literature: Learning Support (33 items, frequency range 0-10, α = 0.96) and Training Impact at Work (12 items, agreement scale from 1 to 5, α = 0.90). Data collection was conducted in person and virtually in three private companies, two to four weeks after the end of training; a total of 83 questionnaires concerning seven trainings was achieved. The sample is comprised by 61 men and 22 women, 18-64 years old, and 53% have completed higher education. Exploratory and descriptive analyzes were performed and also correlation analysis, in order to assess the relationship between the two variables. The Learning Support Scale presented averages between 3.37 and 8.12, high standard deviation and high variation in minimum and maximum responses, indicating divergent responses. The Training Impact at Work Scale presented averages between 3.65 and 4.39, and showed a low standard deviation, but the variation of the minimum and maximum responses is high in most cases, indicating that some respondents did not agree with the statements. Participants perceive moderately Learning Support in the company and judge that have occurred Training Impact at Work. Variables showed a significant and moderate correlation (r = 0.53), which corroborates the literature’s findings related to psychosocial support; but still more research is needed about Learning Support in order to check the scale’s evidences of validity and better define and distinguish this concept in relation to other.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-07-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
article
artículo
Avaliado pelos pares
artigo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/41925
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/41925
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/41925/30507
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2014): EDIÇÃO 78 - mai/ago 2014; 341-370
Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2014): EDIÇÃO 78 - mai/ago 2014; 341-370
Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 20 n. 2 (2014): EDIÇÃO 78 - mai/ago 2014; 341-370
1413-2311
1980-4164
reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ea_read@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766203766407168