Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGDir./UFRGS (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ppgdir/article/view/119238 |
Resumo: | This is an investigation about the differences and similarities in the theories of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse about informal constitutional changes in the 20th century. In Brazilian literature, there is a critical argument about the use of Hsü Dau-Lin's theory in constitutional jurisprudence. By means of the hypothetico-deductive method (Popper), the present research opposes the criticism of theoretical outdatedness and develops a different hypothesis: although they share common starting points, Hsü Dau-Lin's and Konrad Hesse's theories have different problems and purposes. In order to discuss and seek to refute the hypothesis, an analysis of the theoretical context of the "Smend School" is developed, as well as a detailed examination of the arguments of the two jurists. At the end, the article develops a comparative analysis of the constitutional theories and reflects on possible repercussions for the reasoning of judicial decisions in Brazil. Among the results achieved, besides the bibliographical contribution, the article exposes dogmatic possibilities of alerting to the risks of inadequate juridical reasoning when such distinctions are not understood in the theories used, guiding the practice of Constitutional Jurisdiction. KEYWORDS: Informal constitutional changes. Legal Interpretation. Smend School of thought. |
id |
UFRGS-14_7b4ba3c2af0f90e7c11783722a9601a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/119238 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-14 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGDir./UFRGS (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad HesseMutações Constitucionais na "Escola de Smend": Divergências entre as Perspectivas de Hsü Dau-Lin e Konrad HesseMutação constitucionalInterpretação jurídicaEscola de Smend.This is an investigation about the differences and similarities in the theories of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse about informal constitutional changes in the 20th century. In Brazilian literature, there is a critical argument about the use of Hsü Dau-Lin's theory in constitutional jurisprudence. By means of the hypothetico-deductive method (Popper), the present research opposes the criticism of theoretical outdatedness and develops a different hypothesis: although they share common starting points, Hsü Dau-Lin's and Konrad Hesse's theories have different problems and purposes. In order to discuss and seek to refute the hypothesis, an analysis of the theoretical context of the "Smend School" is developed, as well as a detailed examination of the arguments of the two jurists. At the end, the article develops a comparative analysis of the constitutional theories and reflects on possible repercussions for the reasoning of judicial decisions in Brazil. Among the results achieved, besides the bibliographical contribution, the article exposes dogmatic possibilities of alerting to the risks of inadequate juridical reasoning when such distinctions are not understood in the theories used, guiding the practice of Constitutional Jurisdiction. KEYWORDS: Informal constitutional changes. Legal Interpretation. Smend School of thought.Trata-se de investigação sobre as diferenças e semelhanças nas teorias de Hsü Dau-Lin e Konrad Hesse sobre a mutação constitucional no século XX. Na literatura brasileira, há uma crítica sobre o uso da teoria de Hsü Dau-Lin na jurisprudência constitucional. Por meio do método hipotético-dedutivo (Popper), a presente pesquisa contrapõe-se à crítica da desatualização teórica e desenvolve uma hipótese diferente: embora compartilhem pontos de partida em comum, as teorias de Hsü Dau-Lin e Konrad Hesse possuem problemas e propósitos diferentes. Para discutir e buscar refutar a hipótese, são desenvolvidas análises sobre o contexto teórico da “Escola de Smend”, além de realizar um exame detalhado dos argumentos dos dois juristas. Ao final, o artigo desenvolve uma análise comparativa sobre as teorias da mutação e reflete sobre possíveis repercussões para a fundamentação de decisões judiciais no Brasil. Dentre os resultados alcançados, além da contribuição bibliográfica, o artigo expõe possibilidades dogmáticas de alerta para os riscos de fundamentações jurídicas inadequadas quando não compreendias tais distinções nas teorias utilizadas, orientando a prática da Jurisdição Constitucional. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Mutação constitucional. Interpretação jurídica. Escola de Smend.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2022-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer ReviewAvaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ppgdir/article/view/11923810.22456/2317-8558.119238Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022): Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito/UFRGS; 103-130Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS; v. 17 n. 1 (2022): Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito/UFRGS; 103-1302317-85581678-5029reponame:Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGDir./UFRGS (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ppgdir/article/view/119238/86037Copyright (c) 2022 Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Pedro de Oliveira2022-08-31T21:46:39Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/119238Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/ppgdirPUBhttp://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ppgdir/oai||revistappgdir@ufrgs.br2317-85581678-5029opendoar:2022-08-31T21:46:39Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGDir./UFRGS (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse Mutações Constitucionais na "Escola de Smend": Divergências entre as Perspectivas de Hsü Dau-Lin e Konrad Hesse |
title |
Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse |
spellingShingle |
Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse Alves, Pedro de Oliveira Mutação constitucional Interpretação jurídica Escola de Smend. |
title_short |
Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse |
title_full |
Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse |
title_fullStr |
Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse |
title_sort |
Constitutional Changes in the “Smend School of Thought”: Differences Between the perspectives of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse |
author |
Alves, Pedro de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Alves, Pedro de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Pedro de Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mutação constitucional Interpretação jurídica Escola de Smend. |
topic |
Mutação constitucional Interpretação jurídica Escola de Smend. |
description |
This is an investigation about the differences and similarities in the theories of Hsü Dau-Lin and Konrad Hesse about informal constitutional changes in the 20th century. In Brazilian literature, there is a critical argument about the use of Hsü Dau-Lin's theory in constitutional jurisprudence. By means of the hypothetico-deductive method (Popper), the present research opposes the criticism of theoretical outdatedness and develops a different hypothesis: although they share common starting points, Hsü Dau-Lin's and Konrad Hesse's theories have different problems and purposes. In order to discuss and seek to refute the hypothesis, an analysis of the theoretical context of the "Smend School" is developed, as well as a detailed examination of the arguments of the two jurists. At the end, the article develops a comparative analysis of the constitutional theories and reflects on possible repercussions for the reasoning of judicial decisions in Brazil. Among the results achieved, besides the bibliographical contribution, the article exposes dogmatic possibilities of alerting to the risks of inadequate juridical reasoning when such distinctions are not understood in the theories used, guiding the practice of Constitutional Jurisdiction. KEYWORDS: Informal constitutional changes. Legal Interpretation. Smend School of thought. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer Review Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ppgdir/article/view/119238 10.22456/2317-8558.119238 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ppgdir/article/view/119238 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22456/2317-8558.119238 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ppgdir/article/view/119238/86037 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022): Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito/UFRGS; 103-130 Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS; v. 17 n. 1 (2022): Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito/UFRGS; 103-130 2317-8558 1678-5029 reponame:Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGDir./UFRGS (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGDir./UFRGS (Online) |
collection |
Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGDir./UFRGS (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGDir./UFRGS (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistappgdir@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799767002006421504 |